Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Updated: “A complete joke” – MP savages Boris Johnson’s cycling plans as he confirms no investment beyond £350 million manifesto pledge

Government this morning announced 250 miles of segregated cycle lanes and “dozens” of Mini- Hollands throughout England

Boris Johnsons pledge, announced today, to fund 250 miles of segregated cycling infrastructure in England outside London has been described by an MP as “a complete joke.” The prime minister was also forced to confirm to MPs that the government’s investment in cycling does not go beyond the £350 million announced in the Conservative manifesto ahead of December’s general election, a figure that was greeted at the time with dismay by active travel campigners.

The debate that followed Johnson’s infrastructure announcement to the House of Commons this lunchtime focused mainly on HS2 and ‘Northern Powerhouse Rail’ as well as plans to invest in bus services across the country.

Towards the end of the debate, however, some MPs took the opportunity to quiz the prime minister on his plans for cycling.

“A complete joke”

Wera Hobhouse, the Liberal Democrat MP for Bath, said: “To announce 250 miles of new cycle routes as a big green infrastructure investment, it’s a complete joke. It will only mean a few extra miles per local authority, and we as cyclists know what those look like.

“So if he agrees we need many more continuous cycle routes, how can he begin to explain how 250 miles across the country will cut it?”

The prime minister responded: “This is just the beginning.”

Vicky Ford, the Conservative MP for Chelmsford, was next to put a question to Johnson. She said: “I’m delighted to hear that when it comes to buses and bikes, we’re all going Dutch.” She asked the prime minister “to confirm that rapidly growing areas like Essex and the East of England get our fair share of the funding?”

“Absolutely,” Johnson replied.

No money beyond £350 million manifesto pledge for cycling confirmed

The final question of the debate came from Ruth Cadbury, MP for Brentford and Isleworth and co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling and Walking Group.

She said: “To double the rate of cycling from 2 per cent to 4 per cent of all trips will, according to government figures, need £5 billion of funding at least. So how much of today’s announcement for buses and cycling and walking will actually be spent on cycling?”

> Government admits it needs to double cycle funding

Johnson said: “In the first stage, £350 million.”

That is the exact figure set aside for cycling and walking in the party’s general election manifesto to be spent on cycling and walking in the five years of this parliament, equivalent to little more than £1 per person per year.

That compares to the previous figure of £7 per person per year, which was still well below the the £17 per year, rising to £34 annually by 2025, called for by campaign groups belonging to the Cycling & Walking Alliance.

> Alarm at prospect of cycle funding cuts under new government – Conservative manifesto pledges less than a quarter of current funding

PM promises “Mini Hollands blooming across the country like so many tulips”

In his infrastructure announcement to the House of Commons this lunchtime, the prime minister had promised that we would see “Mini Hollands blooming across the country like so many tulips,” and spoke of “a new generation of cyclists” who would “pedal safely and happily to school and work in tree-dappled sunlight on their own network of fully segregated cycle paths.”

Responding to him, leader of the opposition Jeremy Corbyn pointed out that while the government was committing to build 250 of segregated cycle paths throughout the country, Labour had pledged a network extending 3,300 miles in its election manifesto.

That document also pledged spending of £50 per person per year for active travel, something beyond the wildest dreams of cycling and walking campaigners – and given the thumping majority returned to the Tories in December, a dream is what that is almost certain to remain.

Cycling UK says £350 million is “a drop in the ocean”

Following the debate, Paul Tuohy, chief executive of Cycling UK, one of the organisations belonging to the Cycling & Walking Alliance, said that the charity “is hugely disappointed to discover that from a £5 billion fund for ‘buses and bikes’ there’s only a mere £350 million for cycling.

“250 miles of segregated cycle lanes across England is a drop in the ocean, especially when Manchester plans more than 1,800 miles of lanes.

“Better cycling infrastructure will meet the Prime Minister’s ambition to transform towns and cities, making them happier, healthier and cleaner places to live and work, but without an immediate commitment of at least £6 billion over the next five years we’ll never achieve that vision.”

Here is our original story on the government's plans for cycling published ealrier today before the prime minister rose to speak in the House of Commons.

The government says it will build 250 miles of segregated cycle lanes in towns and cities across England, as well as creating “dozens” of Mini Holland neighbourhoods. News of the investment was welcomed by Great Manchester’s Cycling and Walking Commissioner Chris Boardman, who has challenged Prime Minister Boris Johnson to show apply the same commitment to cycling in England as he did to the capital when Mayor of London.

The plans, which apply to England outside London, form part of a five-year, £5 billion package mainly focused on improving bus services across the country and making it easier for people to choose to travel by public transport or on bike.

After outlining planned improvements to bus services, full details of which will be announced in the National Bus Strategy later this year as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review, the government detailed its proposals for cycling.

It pledged that “over 250 miles of new, high-quality separated cycle routes and safe junctions in towns and cities would be built in English towns and cities, and that “dozens of new ‘Mini-Holland’ schemes will be taken forward to transform town centres across the country to make them safer to get around.

“These pilots of low-traffic neighbourhoods will see government working closely with local councils to reduce lorry traffic, making side streets safer to walk, cycle and play in while maintaining the vehicle access people need to get around.”

The government added that “all new routes will be built to tough new design standards, ensuring more people can cycle safely and making getting around by bike a more convenient option.”

The prime minister, who is due to set out details of the proposals to the House of Commons at lunchtime today, said: “Local transport connections have a truly transformative role to play in levelling up infrastructure across the country.

“Our daily journeys for work or leisure are about so much more than just getting from A to B – they are the key to accessing skilled jobs and opportunities, boosting businesses and unlocking economic growth for towns, cities and regions across this country.

“That’s why improving connectivity by overhauling bus services and making cycling easier than ever is such an important step forward, to make sure every community has the foundations it needs to thrive.”

Transport secretary Grant Shapps added: “Our long-term commitment to cycling could not be clearer, with money for new routes, more cyclist support and new ‘Mini-Holland’ schemes, set to make our streets the safest they have been for cyclists.”

The government’s plans have been announced on a day when the All Party Parliamentary Cycling and Walking Group (APPCWG) has published its own Manifesto for Cycling and Walking, calling for “increased investment and a progressive, coherent policy framework … to increase the levels of both cycling and walking.”

The group's co-chair, the Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, said: “Active travel is one of the simplest lifestyle choices that individuals can make to address climate change and air quality, support healthy lifestyles, improve mental and physical health, and increase life expectancy. Cycling and walking save money for the NHS and deliver health benefits.”

The APPCWG this morning hosted a showcase on cycling and walking at the Palace of Westminster with Boardman, who has been leading the development of Greater Manchester’s planned 1,800-mile Bee Network of safe routes for cyclists and walkers, among those in attendance.

Writing in The Times today, he called on the prime minister to ensure that the government guarantees the necessary funding to make that vision a reality.

Boardman recalled how, as Mayor of London, Johnson – helped by Andrew Gilligan, whom he appointed the city’s first Cycling Commissioner and who is now Transport Advisor at Number Ten – invested in cycling to encourage people in the capital to switch to bikes for daily journeys by providing safe infrastructure.

“It was a momentous moment,” Boardman said. “A political leader committing long-term funding to give normal people, in normal clothes, doing normal things, a genuinely viable alternative to driving. And by doing so, create an example for the rest of the country.”

Boardman said that when he was invited to become Greater Manchester’s first ever Cycling and Walking Commissioner in 2017, “I had no hesitation in saying yes.

“The ambition and the commitment was there to do something truly important and give ordinary people the option to leave the car at home.”

Calling for the government to commit to the funding that will enable Greater Mancheter’s vision for cycling and walking to be fully realised, he said: “Whilst today’s announcement is a sure sign that the prime minister shares our ambition to improve sustainable travel options and implement tough new design standards, we need to be fully empowered to deliver the plan we’ve spent two years crafting, to avoid wasting public money.

“If the prime minister is serious about repaying the faith of those in the North who lent him their vote, then he needs to give us the long term commitment required to enable us to do what he did in London. In doing so, he will help us create a blueprint for the rest of the country to follow.”

“If our nation’s leader does want to build on the work he started in the capital and leave a truly country-changing legacy, then I for one am in it to the end,” Boardman added. “That’s the kind of legacy I want to be involved in. Over to you, prime minister.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
growingvegtables | 4 years ago
5 likes

The HS2 disaster - £307 million, per f***ing mile of track.  https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/03/at-307m-per-mile-of-trac....

And cycling gets ... 250 miles of shit.

Avatar
Rome73 | 4 years ago
5 likes

250 miles. Amazing. Splendiferous. Brexit bonus. Get cycling done. 

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid | 4 years ago
9 likes

£350000000 is only a week's worth of Brexit bonus that they aren't going to use on the NHS.

 

Avatar
srchar | 4 years ago
8 likes

I'd rather the £5bn was spent on a more rigorous driving test, regular re-testing and proper police patrols of urban traffic. Making our existing routes safer would encourage cycling far more than a few token kilometres of bike path.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to srchar | 4 years ago
13 likes

It wouldn't, though. You might be happy sharing the roads with traffic, but most people aren't, and most parents won't let their kids ride to school in heavy traffic.

It's not just about what suits one person. You have to ask 'what will result in more/mass cycling?' and it's cycle routes away from or protected from traffic.

Avatar
EddyBerckx replied to HarrogateSpa | 4 years ago
1 like

this

Avatar
WeLoveHills replied to srchar | 4 years ago
1 like
srchar wrote:

I'd rather the £5bn was spent on a more rigorous driving test, regular re-testing and proper police patrols of urban traffic. Making our existing routes safer would encourage cycling far more than a few token kilometres of bike path.

No. £350m would produce a few token kilometers. £5bn would produce segregated bike lanes, which we desperately need.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 4 years ago
4 likes

It's better than nothing, but as others have said, 250 miles of segregated lanes in England doesn't go very far.

All the other main parties had more ambitious plans for cycling, with £35-50 per head per year promised. Labour planned to build 5,000km of protected cycleways. We (43% of us) voted for the wrong lot.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 4 years ago
4 likes

Utterly astonishingly, the BBC is focussing entirely on HS2 and buses, no discussion whatsoever of cycling.  Given the government's record on spending on cycling, I very much doubt that more than 50 miles of proper cycle routes will actually happen, and that will be compromised at every junction and road narrowing.

I have my doubts about the new "tough new design standards" which will either be so strict that nothing gets built, or so weak that the routes will be useless.  Note that the mini-Hollands are just pilots, like the cycling cities and various other schemes, none of which are rolled out nationwide and are quietly forgotten.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
6 likes

Call me a cynic, but I'm not surprised by the BBC ignoring active travel.

I'm more worried about the HS2 being implemented in a cost-cutting fashion that involves no cycling provision for where the rail lines disrupt existing roads/paths.

Avatar
peted76 replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
5 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Call me a cynic, but I'm not surprised by the BBC ignoring active travel.

I'm more worried about the HS2 being implemented in a cost-cutting fashion that involves no cycling provision for where the rail lines disrupt existing roads/paths.

Haven't they already scrapped the cycling provison away from HS2? I'm sure I read that it was quietly cut (which is a sodding travesty!)

Avatar
Luca Patrono replied to peted76 | 4 years ago
3 likes
Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to peted76 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Yeah - that's what I was thinking of, but wasn't sure of the details.

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
0 likes

BBC Have Your Say - plenty of the usual crap to stick a pithy response into.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-51453457

 

Avatar
Rich_cb | 4 years ago
6 likes

A total of 250 miles is pretty dismal. If they were concentrated in a handful of cities it might be enough to make a difference but if they're spread across England it won't change anything.

The new design standards are an opportunity to eliminate the building of bad infrastructure if they are strict enough. I'm not confident they will be.

Avatar
Awavey replied to Rich_cb | 4 years ago
0 likes

Depends how you approach it doesnt it ? A 2.5 mile central dedicated safe cycling corridor across 100 towns even cities, would be more than enough to get the pedals turning so to speak, & quality is far more important than quantity imo. let's make use of what's being given first and then use it to make the case for more.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Awavey | 4 years ago
1 like

I'm not sure 2.5 miles will make much difference in most cities.

In Cardiff they're planning about 20 miles of segregated cycle routes, that's about the minimum you'll need to see a modal shift IMHO.

Avatar
Awavey replied to Rich_cb | 4 years ago
0 likes

if it was well planned and thought out actually linked places people wanted to go, it could make a massive difference, got to remember most towns and cities have no segregated infra at all to start with, anything better than paint on a pavement or in the gutter will be an improvement.

Avatar
Jetmans Dad replied to Awavey | 4 years ago
2 likes

Awavey wrote:

Depends how you approach it doesnt it ? A 2.5 mile central dedicated safe cycling corridor across 100 towns even cities, would be more than enough to get the pedals turning  ...

In some cities that might be enough but I am not convinced. In Hull, Where I live the city centre is very compact and a 2.5 mile single segregated lane across it would allow you to cycle in from either side of the centre (though not too far outside) and then park up somewhere in easy reach of most facilities. 

Other cities have more sprawling centres and cover a much wider geographic area. I am not sure Leeds and York, for example, would see much of a boost in cycling from a single corridor, but once you start to broaden provision in those cities, you dilute the funds available for others, which brings us back to square one. 

The bottom line is ... the country voted in a Conservative government promising to spend £350m on cycling provision over 5 years and it looks like it is going to deliver on that promise.

We can't say we weren't warned. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
0 likes

Well, this is somewhat good news, but definitely too little, too late. I'm somewhat puzzled as to why it's just England and not including Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
8 likes

Because mostly only Englandshire was stupid enough to vote for this useless sack of hot air?

Avatar
Sniffer replied to Secret_squirrel | 4 years ago
3 likes

Well Scotland didn't vote for him anyway.

Transport is a devolved issue and hence the Westminster Government, thankfully, does not have it in its remit outside England.

The same for Housing, Education, Policing, Environment, Health etc etc.  This keeps Boris and his nonsense far away with the primary exception of the the one thing he promised to 'get done'.

Not that Scotland's record is where it should be either, but England's promise of 250 miles in five years is absolutely pathetic.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Sniffer | 4 years ago
10 likes

England didn't vote for him either - 53% of us, anyway. We're stuck with all the crap being inflicted on us by the liar.

Avatar
Sniffer replied to HarrogateSpa | 4 years ago
1 like

You have my sympathy.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
1 like

I think it is because cycling is devolved - it's the Welsh and Scottish administrations that deal with it. In NI it could be the Sec of State for NI while Stormont is suspended.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
7 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Well, this is somewhat good news, but definitely too little, too late. I'm somewhat puzzled as to why it's just England and not including Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Because at the end of those five years the United Kingdom will only be England, with the others all having left...?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
1 like

What about Gibraltar?

Avatar
jollygoodvelo replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
1 like

hawkinspeter wrote:

What about Gibraltar?

Eurovelo 8 already almost goes there...  3 https://en.eurovelo.com/ev8/from-cadiz-to-elche

Avatar
Argos74 replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
5 likes

Northern Ireland will vote for a united Ireland, Scotland for independence and joining the EU, and we'll put a big sign saying "Greenland" on Cardiff Castle and sell Wales to Murrica for twenty quid and a bag of chlorinated chicken.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 4 years ago
10 likes

Lets put it into perspective. 

Bee Network 1800 miles of cycleways for 1 City vs 250 miles for the entire country.

A pathetic drop in the ocean and PR stunt.

Ironically the 2021 cross border customs checks quietly announced today under this smokescreen will probably do more to keep cyclists safe by reducing the amount of lorries on our roads than this twaddle will.

How about an integrated public transport strategy with more cycle compartments/carriers on Buses and Trains?

To put this in context 5Bn is 1 years worth of National roads budget or 1/20th of an HS2.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/298667/united-kingdom-uk-public-sect...

Pages

Latest Comments