Helmets could be made mandatory for riders taking part in hill climbs, with the matter set to be voted on at the annual general meeting of the national council of Cycling Time Trials (CTT) on Sunday.
CTT is the national governing body for time trialling in the UK, and its remit also extends to hill climbs, typically held over the autumn.
Events such as the Catford Hill Climb in Kent – the world’s oldest bike race, tracing its history back to 1886 – and the Monsal Hill Climb in Derbyshire attracting strong competition and hundreds of spectators
Regulation 15 of CTT’s Regulations governs protective helmets and starts with the words: “All competitors under the age of 18 years and/or Juniors must wear a properly affixed helmet which must be of hard/soft shell construction.”
A proposed amendment put forward by CTT’s Scotland District Council and which aims to “enhance competitor safety” would remove the words “under the age of 18 years and/or Juniors” as well as the words “(or parent or guardian if the rider is aged under 18 years of age)” from the regulation.
The effect would be to extend it to all riders competing in events sanctioned by the governing body.
However, there have been suggestions on social media that other districts might be mandated by their memberships to introduce a further amendment specifically excluding hill climbs from the scope of the regulation, other than for under-18 or Junior riders.
For the amendment to pass, it would need to have support of at least two thirds of the delegates at the national council’s meeting, which takes place in Daventry, Northamptonshire this weekend.
As well as hill climbs, the proposed amendment means that the regulation would apply to all time trials sanctioned by CTT. While almost all participants in those would wear a helmet anyway – not least to improve aerodynamics – in longer events, riders may remove them late on for reasons of comfort.
Other proposed amendments to the regulations on the agenda for Sunday’s meeting include that competitors should be required to have front and rear lights to make them more visible to other road users, and that a current ban on headphones and earphones other than hearing aids be extended to include bike-mounted speakers.






















21 thoughts on “Helmets to be made compulsory for hill climb competitors?”
(sits back, with a bag of
(sits back, with a bag of popcorn…)
Paging CyclingInBeastMode…
Paging CyclingInBeastMode…
hawkinspeter wrote:
Who cares, it’s a very narrow cross-section of a small out group that mostly stays out of sight.
CyclingInBeastMode wrote:
That’s clearly a cricket helmet, and therefore nothing to do with cycling. Away with you, foul rodent! (W. Shakespeare, Wm III, Scene two, Act three)
burtthebike wrote:
Looks like an American Football helmet to me.
hawkinspeter wrote:
c’mon man, everyone knows that those helmets are banned under current rules, why won’t anyone think of the kits … (note space before ellipses
)
burtthebike wrote:
They would lower the chance of trash tossed from a car/van hitting you in the face without committing to the full face motorsport helmet so probably very useful in today’s rat infested roads.
Does anyone not use a helmet
Does anyone not use a helmet in a standard TT? I can quite understand not wanting to use one for HCs.
lesterama wrote:
Not seen it in our club 10 mile but at the 24 hour lots of people gave up with the aero lid. Probably because of the weight over that amount of time.
lesterama wrote:
I know 2 people who race TTs without a hat. There were 3 before I acquired an aero helmet.
Simon E wrote:
You killed someone for their helmet?
Mandatory helmets and lights
Mandatory helmets and lights comes up every year. Hasn’t been passed yet.
Not entirely relevant, but I
Not entirely relevant, but I kept this image to post it on the next helmet debate.
I don’t know if it’s new to anyone, but I liked it.
Thanks to the Cycling Professor, I found it on his twitter page.
Thanks to Dave Walker (The
Thanks to Dave Walker (The Cycling Cartoonist) for drawing the cartoon!
ktache wrote:
Seems pretty relevant to me, except the LH column could include drivers and quite a few cyclists and anyone who hasn’t looked at the evidence.
I’m just disappointed I won’t
I’m just disappointed I won’t be able to race up the Rake with Chemical Brothers blasting out of a set of B&W 603s strapped to the forks.
Drinfinity wrote:
With each year that passes I ride up various local hills and they’re rarely as bad as I remember them. Except the Rake. That’s worse. Every time.
I’m glad someone can save
I’m glad someone can save these cyclists from themselves. Will somebody please think of the children.
Rick_Rude wrote:
Not since the court order
And thanks to riskymoth for
And thanks to riskymoth for knowing who drew it.
A shit-for-brains proposal
A shit-for-brains proposal that helps no-one and is, thankfully, very unlikely to be passed.