Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
26 comments
"These go to 11 ." - Nigel Tufnel (1984)
The future is now.
A remake of "Breaking Away" would be a travesty. It was perfect - and it wasn't about the bike race...
On the "what biek is that" question:
https://www.matchlesslondon.com/blogs/luxury-urban-mobility/urban-luxury...
No proce that I can find, so makes me think it is a case of "if you have to ask".
click the shop now button, but sit down first - €7000! Wallet says no…
Why all the hate for Peloton? They aren't stopping anyone from riding a bike outside. If it doesn't appeal to you then don't buy one of their bikes, and if you don't think it's a good business then don't buy shares in it.
Probably a reaction to a company that tried to trademark the word "Peloton" (which has been in general use in cycling for decades) and threaten legal action against (I think it was) GPLama for daring to use the word in one of his videos referring to an actual peloton rather than the fitness company.
Always seemed a little ironic coming from a company whose logo appears to be a straight rip off of the Pinterest logo.
Peloton. £40 quid a month to be patronised by some overmuscled git less than 1/2 my age through a TV screen. What has the world come to that this would ever be considered a viable business model?
Fantastic news about the Cycle for Health scheme, proving yet again the health benefits of cycling. I'm sure it will be all over the media any minute. Of course it will, and they'll probably tie it in to the election promises of the various parties to fulfil the BMA's demand for £20/head/year for active travel, which has so clogged up every front page and every news prog. Anything else with this level of benefit would be front and centre in all the media.
Or not; it's cycling, so determindly hated by the media in the UK.
I have a "best" bike (rarely ridden) and a "do everything" bike that gets adapted according to the seasons. Currently on chunky mud tyres (WTB Sendero) plus mudguards. Come dryer weather it will go back on 700c fast gravel tyres. Probably. To be honest it's so good on the Senderos it might stay on them year round
Ah, the previous administration gambit. School has had something like 5 head teachers since it was formed. Symptomatic of the free school "movement"
I'm not saying people shouldn't take up the cause, but if Google Streetview is to be believed, the Hackney school bike parking was removed sometime between May and August 2017 and cars seem to have parked there since. Why the fuss only now? Perhaps because the parking spaces only seem to have been painted in sometime after April this year?
Chapeau to Russ Mantle!
Almost a million miles.
https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/people/hampshire-cyclist-82-set-to-bec...
Mostly all on his cherished Holdsworth.
"25-30 miles every other day, now that his fitness has dropped off a little"
The car parking thing is so absurd. All that space used just for three pampered teachers.
To get to and from those spaces legally they'd all have to drive in and out strictly in order, in a convoy.
And again, I wonder about the views from 2008 on streetview, that show the normal paving extending almost to the building wall (originally there were bollards there). Has the school nicked part of what used to be the pavement? And if that land legally belongs to the school, that's potential space for a classroom wasted on three people's car storage.
Academies are part of our general drift towards Putinism. Wanna-be oligarchs building private empires at the state's expense.
It is a converted office block added to / turned into the school. So unless they knocked it down and rebuilt it...... Plus it would be the worlds thinnest classroom to fit the slots (x3 (?) for floors).
However as the school has now come out and stated Teachers aren't allowed to park there, then who is doing the parking? Have they "hired out" the spaces to stangers?
Yeah, I gathered that from streetview - it appears to have changed use several times. But focussing on the practical rather recent history of the specific space is not my point.
Space used for storing private motor vehicles is space that could have been used for something more productive. That's true across the whole city and that it's been a problem for a long time doesn't make it any less wasteful. In this case it appears that in recent history that space was previously used to provide more room for pedestrians, and even that would be a better use of the space than parking 3 people's cars.
The response does indeed make one wonder who's cars they are. Could it be senior administrative employees of the academy trust rather than those who actually do the teaching? That would make it worse, I reckon.
It's OK, they have a Road Safety Week starting on November 18th, everything is fine.
Well, except for the OFSTED report
https://files.api.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/50107152
which (having read a few) is one of the worst I've ever seen. The only positive they found was that "emergency intervention by external consultants" has made the school physically safe.
Physically safe except where children and parents have to share the pavement with cars trying to park.
It's all comes down to a bit of give and take really. Can't the children and parents just learn to share the pavement?
An excellent suggestion. All that is needed is a little signage...
7C22736B-BB1E-4A7E-AEB8-F95A8BE0D6B4.jpeg
It's not just the loss of the bike parking that will be a problem. Presumably there is also some sort of crane involved to allow the cars to be lifted over the pavement into and out of the spaces.
I personally think there must be a very lucrative business in hiring out all these invisible cranes to help Hard Pressed Motorists who need to take up public space to store their cars.
Ah, so the school in question is an academy? And therefore outside of local authority control? I'm guessing their considered response will be "Meh!".
But if they're breaking one of their planning conditions for the site, then the council will be able to force them to comply or possibly have the site demolished.
Yes, but they can only get them under planning rules. If it was still a local authority school, the local authority would have
ignored the problembeen able to make the required changes.They've stolen almost the entire school system without a whimper of opposition.
It's no surprise that they've moved onto snaffling the pavements.