Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Transgender debate continues as Dr Rachel McKinnon retains world title

Canadian also set new world record in the heats at world championships in Manchester

Dr Rachel McKinnon has successfully defended her 35-39 age group women’s 200 metre sprint title at the UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in Manchester, reigniting the debate over whether transgender athletes should be allowed to compete in women’s sport.

The 37-year-old Canadian, who lives in the United States, also set a world record in the heats for the event at the National Cycling Centre on Saturday – with The Times reporting “loud cheering” for her opponent, Dawn Orwick.

McKinnon’s successful defence of the title has seen renewed calls for the UCI to excluded transgender athletes from women’s races from the pressure groups Fair Play for Women and Save Women’s Sports, as well as from Jennifer Wagner-Assali, aged 39, who took bronze in the event last year in Los Angeles but did not participate in Manchester.

Speaking of when she was beaten by McKinnon last year (she is pictured alongside her on the podium above), she said: “It was an unfair race and I accepted that when I pinned on the number, and I tried to do my best to overcome the unfairness.

“I do feel that hard-fought freedoms for women’s sport are being eroded. If we continue to let this happen there will be men’s sports and co-ed sports but there won’t be any women’s sports.”

Wagner-Assali denied that prejudice against transgender athletes lay behind the calls on the UCI to exclude them from women’s events.

“We have nothing against the trans women personally or that they want to ride or race their bikes,” she said. “We just don’t think the female category is the right place.”

However, McKinnon today accused British masters cyclist Victoria Hood of expressing “an irrational feel of transgender women,” adding that “an irrational fear of trans women is the dictionary definition of trans phobia” and that “transphobia has no place in sport.”

Hood had claimed in an interview with BBC Sport that some riders decided not to enter the event since "they don't want to compete" against McKinnon.

She said: "The science is there. The science is clear – it tells us that trans women have an advantage," she said.

"The world record has just been beaten today by somebody born male, who now identifies as female, and the gap between them and the next born female competitor was quite a lot.

"The world record was two tenths of a second. I know that doesn't sound like a lot but it is.

"The gap between them and the next female competitor was four tenths, which to put into perspective in a sprint event like this, that would be 15m of the track, when sprint events are usually won by centimetres.

"It is a human right to participate in sport. I don't think it's a human right to identify into whichever category you choose," she added.

According to BBC Sport, Hood missed the championships due to injury, although a response posted on Twitter to her comments suggests that McKinnon was under the impression that the British rider did not take part because she did not want to race against her.

She also pointed out that Hood falls into a different age group she has turned 40, and that she could find no record of the pair ever having raced against each other.

Her statement (see below) also pointed out that under UCI and IOC rules she was entitled to participate in the event, and that she “supports trans people’s rights to compete in their legally recognised gender.

“Fairness in sport means inclusion and respect of every athlete’s rights and indemnity,” she concluded.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

48 comments

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 4 years ago
5 likes

There definitely needs to be a 'ladyboy' class. It's absolutely not fair to have an ( essentially, great big man ) who 'identifies as a woman', or has had the full on nip / tuck / fold op done, racing with proper biological women. There has to come a point, where the regulating bodies for the given sport, say "shove your P.C. / snowflakey bullshit, enough is enough" There's enough opportunity for the 'trans athletes' to have their own categories, if they wish to have a crack, I really don't think they should be allowed to race with the naturally biologically assigned athletes.

Avatar
benm replied to Judge dreadful | 4 years ago
5 likes
Judge dreadful wrote:

There definitely needs to be a 'ladyboy' class. It's absolutely not fair to have an ( essentially, great big man ) who 'identifies as a woman', or has had the full on nip / tuck / fold op done, racing with proper biological women. There has to come a point, where the regulating bodies for the given sport, say "shove your P.C. / snowflakey bullshit, enough is enough" There's enough opportunity for the 'trans athletes' to have their own categories, if they wish to have a crack, I really don't think they should be allowed to race with the naturally biologically assigned athletes.

Using phrases like 'ladyboy' makes it impossible to have any meaningful discussion about this issue. Disagree with the rules/physical inequality of trans athletes competing in women's sports all you like but this phrase is akin to homophobic slurs and I think road.cc mods need to have a think about letting their website be a platform for this type of language.

Avatar
Judge dreadful replied to benm | 4 years ago
1 like

benm wrote:
Judge dreadful wrote:

There definitely needs to be a 'ladyboy' class. It's absolutely not fair to have an ( essentially, great big man ) who 'identifies as a woman', or has had the full on nip / tuck / fold op done, racing with proper biological women. There has to come a point, where the regulating bodies for the given sport, say "shove your P.C. / snowflakey bullshit, enough is enough" There's enough opportunity for the 'trans athletes' to have their own categories, if they wish to have a crack, I really don't think they should be allowed to race with the naturally biologically assigned athletes.

Using phrases like 'ladyboy' makes it impossible to have any meaningful discussion about this issue. Disagree with the rules/physical inequality of trans athletes competing in women's sports all you like but this phrase is akin to homophobic slurs and I think road.cc mods need to have a think about letting their website be a platform for this type of language.

 

get a grip.

Avatar
alansmurphy replied to Judge dreadful | 4 years ago
7 likes

Judge dreadful wrote:

There definitely needs to be a 'ladyboy' class. It's absolutely not fair to have an ( essentially, great big man ) who 'identifies as a woman', or has had the full on nip / tuck / fold op done, racing with proper biological women. There has to come a point, where the regulating bodies for the given sport, say "shove your P.C. / snowflakey bullshit, enough is enough" There's enough opportunity for the 'trans athletes' to have their own categories, if they wish to have a crack, I really don't think they should be allowed to race with the naturally biologically assigned athletes.

 

HOUSE!

 

You've just won Gammon Trans Bingo, please collect your prive of a white sheet and hood at reception!

 

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to Judge dreadful | 4 years ago
2 likes

Judge dreadful wrote:

[...] There's enough opportunity for the 'trans athletes' to have their own categories, if they wish to have a crack,[...]

that would have been a crackin' good joke in the 1970s. I'm far too old, liberal and politically correct to enjoy it now, but my 13-year-old self would have loved it.

 

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 4 years ago
9 likes

Great step forward for transgender rights. Now to tackle ageism in sport. I have a good feeling that I'm going to ace the over 90's hour record.

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 4 years ago
14 likes

Yes Flat4, So brave. So inclusive. So actually unfair to those born as women.

But it's obviously just the rules at fault. Pesky rules.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Rick_Rude | 4 years ago
1 like
Rick_Rude wrote:

Yes Flat4, So brave. So inclusive. So actually unfair to those born as women.

But it's obviously just the rules at fault. Pesky rules.

Is it not just the rules, then? Seems a perfectly reasonable point that the debate should be about those rules, not about attacking any individual.

Hate the game not the player, no? What am I missing?

Avatar
Rick_Rude replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 4 years ago
1 like

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
Rick_Rude wrote:

Yes Flat4, So brave. So inclusive. So actually unfair to those born as women. But it's obviously just the rules at fault. Pesky rules.

Is it not just the rules, then? Seems a perfectly reasonable point that the debate should be about those rules, not about attacking any individual. Hate the game not the player, no? What am I missing?

You will be missing natural women in sport. If women don't want to stand up for it then so be it.

At this point we may as well just say 'fuck it' and have genderless sport.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Rick_Rude | 4 years ago
1 like
Rick_Rude wrote:

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
Rick_Rude wrote:

Yes Flat4, So brave. So inclusive. So actually unfair to those born as women. But it's obviously just the rules at fault. Pesky rules.

Is it not just the rules, then? Seems a perfectly reasonable point that the debate should be about those rules, not about attacking any individual. Hate the game not the player, no? What am I missing?

You will be missing natural women in sport. If women don't want to stand up for it then so be it.

At this point we may as well just say 'fuck it' and have genderless sport.

Yeah, don't care, not interested in competitive sport, I'd scrap the lot if it were up to me. I'm merely asking whether you arguing for changing the rules or for something else? Because your posts seem inconsistent on that point.

Avatar
flat4 | 4 years ago
3 likes

Wow. Not much tolerance and inclusion on here.

Dr. McKinnon has followed the UCI rules, etc. If you've an issue with the rules take it up with them. Don't take it out on the brave woman who has been through more challenges in her life than most of us ever have to deal with AND still managed to be a Dr and a world champion.

She qualified, she raced, she won.  This is no different to Nils Eekhoff being disqualified - it's the rules.

Fix the rules if you don't agree with them.

Avatar
iandusud replied to flat4 | 4 years ago
4 likes

flat4 wrote:

Wow. Not much tolerance and inclusion on here.

Dr. McKinnon has followed the UCI rules, etc. If you've an issue with the rules take it up with them. Don't take it out on the brave woman who has been through more challenges in her life than most of us ever have to deal with AND still managed to be a Dr and a world champion.

She qualified, she raced, she won.  This is no different to Nils Eekhoff being disqualified - it's the rules.

Fix the rules if you don't agree with them.

Whilst you are right that the problem here is with the rules I don't think it's fair to accuse anyone of a lack of tollerance and inclusion. This is sport and it has to be played on a level field, otherwise it makes a total mockery out of having women and men competing in separate events and we should just ignore gender entirely.

Avatar
Calc | 4 years ago
7 likes

I identify as a cyborg.  Records I set with a motor are valid.

Avatar
hobbeldehoy | 4 years ago
10 likes

The way to deal with this is for female competitors to boycott events where McKinnon is taking part. McKinnon's participation makes a mockery of women's sport.

Avatar
Sriracha | 4 years ago
6 likes

As with any emperor's new clothes, the fact of expressing dissent is itself enough to impugn the dissenter and disqualify their dissent:

However, McKinnon today accused British masters cyclist Victoria Hood of expressing “an irrational feel of transgender women,” adding that “an irrational fear of trans women is the dictionary definition of trans phobia” and that “transphobia has no place in sport.”

Avatar
srchar | 4 years ago
12 likes

I've no problem calling her a woman. But there comes a point where someone's feelings and wishes are not the most important thing. That point is women's sport.
I expect I'll be told by someone that, as a non-trans person (the chemist in me refuses to use the word 'cis'), my opinion counts for nothing. But most people who watch sport aren't trans either. Women's sport will appeal to very few people if it continues down this path.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 4 years ago
7 likes

Is this a bloke comverted to woman?
If so, no records should stand or compete in women's competitions

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 4 years ago
10 likes

Please don't recognise any records set by this sort of athlete. Biological women may as well just throw in the towel if they start doing it. 

Pages

Latest Comments