Sir Bradley Wiggins has said that he does not want his son Ben – now aged 14 – to become a pro cyclist, despite the teenager recently coming within a whisker of winning the North West Youth and Junior Tour in August.
Mail Online reports that the five-time Olympic gold medallist and 2012 Tour de France winner, who described his son as “very talented,” made the comment as the national tour of his one-man show drew to a close last week in London.
“I'm not going to push him into that now so I can stand there in 10 years' time when he wins Olympic gold and the reflected glory – ‘That's my son’,” Wiggins said.
"I can't do that, it's cruel,'” he added.
Anyone who has followed Wiggins' career will know that he is a complicated character, and that much of that has to do with his father Gary, who enjoyed a lot of success on the six-day circuit, abandoning the two-year-old Bradley and his mother, which led to them moving from Belgium to London.
Had that not happened, would the 'Kid from Kilburn' have gone on to become a multiple wporld and Olympic champion on the track, and enjoyed so much success on the road?
Wiggins also spoke to The Sunday Times about his home, and his collection of cycling memorabilia.
“I’ve probably got one of the biggest, rarest collections of cycling memorabilia in the world,” he said. “It’s race jerseys, mainly, from the biggest names in the sport.
“At one time, jerseys weren’t like they are today, they were wool with advertising stitched on by hand. To me, they are works of art.
“My most treasured is my Sean Yates yellow jersey. I associate it with being 14 and wanting to do what I got to do for a living.
“Sean and I have become close – he’s an inspiration, and when I won the Tour he was my directeur sportif,” he added.
Add new comment
34 comments
Maybe they should have used "Be careful when opening car doors" along with an appropriate image.
cyclistcrash.jpeg
Sensible sign, which enforces riding more central on the carriage way to protect yourself
Seems the sign is directed at users on the path (presumably shared). Looking at the height, it is more of a warning to cyclists. And pedestrians, based on one experience I had.
How did you come to that conclusion? Looks more like a sign, aimed at cyclists using the shared use path, associated with a painted dashed line to supposedly delineate the dooring zone (which it does not because a fully open car door would reach much further into the path). Victim blaming indeed.
Why? Because the driver of a car is responsible for ensuring that it is clear before opening their door. Although sensible for cyclists to leave enough room when passing parked cars, the responsibility for preventing a car dooring incident lays squarely with the operator of the vehicle. So, would not signs facing the parking bays, clearly visible to the drivers reminding them to check their blind spot using a technique such as the Dutch Reach not be more appropriate?
PP
Pages