Live blog: Video: Cyclist clipped by wing mirror – no action taken; Whoopi Goldberg says bike lanes are “screwing up” New York, Twitter post threatening to “run over” cyclists backfires, important Lance Armstrong lavatory news + more
SUMMARY
Peter Sagan takes first victory of the season (+ videos)
Peter Sagan took a bike-throwingly narrow victory on stage three of the Tour Down Under in the Adelaide Hills – same as he did last year.
Behind Sagan everything was completely different. Luis León Sánchez was second and Daryl Impey was third. Last year Impey was second and Sanchez was third.
The Kiwi Patrick Bevin retains the overall lead by a second from Sagan.
Stage four of the Tour Down Under features the Corkscrew climb about 6km from the finish
This is normally the point in the race where we get a much clearer idea who’s going to win.
BREAKING: Lance Armstrong shows us his toilet
We know that many of you become violently enraged whenever we cover anything to do with Lance Armstrong, so we’ve made a vow that from now on we’ll only do Lance stories that are of the utmost importance.
Today’s big news is that he showed Architectural Digest round his home in Aspen and made a big point of showing them the toilet.
Apparently he has one of those Squatty Potties because he once saw Bryan Cranston from Breaking Bad recommending them on TV.
Clever
Doesn’t this make more sense? #TTDC19 #TRBAM2019 #TRB19 #mobility pic.twitter.com/5JLesQaozx
— Colin K. Hughes (@colinkhughes) January 16, 2019
Sagan applauds teammates after TDU victory
Jess Varnish fails in attempt to prove she was employee of British Cycling and UK Sport
British Cycling says its culture has improved since Varnish raised concerns and it hopes to ‘welcome her to national cycling centre’.
Well this is going well... #bloodycyclists
Either ride on the cycle tracks or stop being a twat and drive or get the bus, fucking done with cyclists next one I see I’m running over
— Chlo (@ChloeLarcombe98) January 16, 2019
Probably not a great idea to plan an attempted murder on social media, but we reckon this individual may learn her lesson (well we hope so before getting in a car again) judging by the comments…
“You screwed the city up,” says Whoopi Goldberg of New York bike lanes
The actress has been praised in the past for her activism promoting LGBT rights, but perhaps the same can’t be said of her views on the environment after she expressed her dislike for segregated bike lanes in New York City. Appearing on ABC’s ‘The View’, Goldberg said to the New York Mayor Bill de Blasio: “You know what’s really pissing me off? You’ve built 83 miles of protected bike lanes, okay. And I like bikes, I like people who ride, but I don’t think you understand the impact of taking something like 10th Avenue, which is six lanes down to two-and-a-half, particularly when you have a winter storm and you can’t move – none of that is movable.
“You screwed the city up. I come in every day, and I find that because you can’t make a turn anywhere, you can’t go straight anywhere. When there is a storm, people can’t move anywhere, because you got all these medians in the way, and I’m just saying you might want to take a look at some of this. Because now you have Cuomo coming in talking about congestion pricing, and I kind of feel like it’s a set up.”
Goldberg has been reminded by transport activists that the bike lanes, part of New York’s Vision Zero, are reducing road deaths according to stats. Speaking to Metro USA, Joe Cutrufo of Transportation Alternatives said: “Vision zero is saving lives. She contends that the mayor has screwed up the city, we would argue that cutting traffic fatalities by a third in just five years is the opposite of that. Maybe even more important, bike lanes are a critical part of the transportation system in a city where the majority of residents don’t drive.
Of the 3.8 million workers in New York City, only 27 percent commute via car, truck or van, according to the New York City Economic Development Corporation. In Manhattan specifically that number drops to 8 percent. For a long time there has been a perception that drivers rule the roost, that needs to change and frankly that is changing. We have reclaimed many miles of street space in this city and intend to reclaim even more.
“You can’t move as many people in cars as you can in space-efficient modes like buses and bikes and [by] walking. It’s a shame that this narrative continues when the benefits of designing streets for pedestrian and bicyclists and transit riders are so obvious, for economic and environmental and equity benefits.”
Spanish actor releases seriously shocking video of a French motorist ploughing into the back of him while cycling
Dani Rovira, who was taking part in charity challenge, was somehow back on his bike the following day.
Froome out for a casual spin in South Africa
The 140 mile ride with teammate Salvatore Puccio covered over 22,000 feet of climbing… only to be flagged by vigilant/jealous members of the Strava community (team car suspicions perhaps?)
Click here to see the deets.
Police say driver "may not have realised" that Lincolnshire cyclist was pushed into railings
Video: Cyclist clipped by passing driver’s wing mirror – sluggish police response meant no action was taken
The incident occurred on Holcroft Lane, which runs between Glazebrook and Culcheth in Cheshire.
Barry writes: “After being told by the police this would be treated as a failure to stop, the investigating officer then decided that because I had traced the car’s insurers, it would be left to the insurers to apportion blame.
“It was only after exchanges with the police that they decided to do something about the driving offences and it was clear the most likely outcome was going to a driving awareness course (DAC). The driver was finally contacted and agreed to go on a DAC.
“The investigating officer’s recommendation for a DAC for the driver was ‘declined due to evidence and not in the public interest to prosecute. Also the time elapsed since the initial incident.’ As a result the police are taking no further action against this driver.”
Barry added that the delay was with the police not him. “They had the full footage and a statement from me the same evening as the incident.”
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
20 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Paul J As I understand it, the sale did include the IP for the dhb brand, and I think Frasers/Evans claimed to have been planning to keep the brand going. That said, there's no reason to think that the brand has/will retain the quality or value credentials it was formerly known for - I don't believe any staff were retained, nor any obligation to retain or restore relationships with the suppliers that had previously manufactured dhb-branded kit. Far more likely dhb becomes another "brand" plastered across the cheap tat that is the hallmark of the Frasers empire. I note the dhb website you link to doesn't appear to have been updated since February 2024 (based on Wayback Machine archives).
@Rendel Harris I think it says a lot about the previous two days that not many guys chose to race for the sake of racing. If the win is prestigious (like Paris) and/or the previous stages haven’t been so brutal then more teams and riders will choose to race. It’s a shame because Paris the last couple of years has been great and I can see what they were thinking! Few minor tweaks and I think it works. I’m also from a generation where an organiser could just say “the course is safe, if you want your prize money, race. No tears” and it would have happened unless Hinault didn’t fancy it. Which he would’ve. I could also see a situation where a GC contender wants to work for one of their team-mates who has worked for them for three weeks so a GC cordially agreed truce wouldn’t be possible, but how big would the time gaps be, anyway?
It's long past the time when there should be meaningful enforcement of illegal ebikes and escooters. Utterly ridiculuous to be able to go to a high street shop like Curry's and buy an escooter that's illegal to use in a public place. The "illegal to use in a public place" stuff should just be banned from sale completeley and enforcement action taken. There's issues across the board. Amazon selling tons of stuff that just doesn't comply with safety standards. In the good old days there were a properly resourced trading standards departments within local authorities. I say bring 'em back, funded by prosecutions and fines from those who make a profit from dangerous kit. Do that, and there'll be no need for folks like Network Rail to be faced with an impossible dilemma whether to allow a free for all and risk a fatal fire, or ban legitimate users that may need their ebike for basic transport.
Although van Schip has been a victim of the UCI's pettiness and retrospective application of the rules, I think this is a step towards Making Cycling Aesthetically Pleasing Again. Really, pro-cycling isn't about winning races, it's about looking fantastic. I only hope that the World Champs are won by cyclists who have a commitment to plastering rainbow bands on absolutely every bit of their kit.
It's a shame that the final day neutralisation has distracted from the fact that this was one of the best GTs in quite a while, with all the jerseys in play right up to the penultimate day. It's certainly ridiculous to leave the decision on neutralisation until the evening before the stage but more generally, why not? It's only really a variation on the sprint safety zone, after all, and the final stages have effectively been neutralised (when they are not time trials) for a long time with the GC teams staying in touch until the safety zone and then letting the sprinters go. It was a great finish despite, or maybe because of, the neutralisation and it was rather nice for the winner's team to be able to ride in behind the peloton so that all the fans got a good look at them and could show their appreciation of the winner. If we want the excitement of narrow climbing finishes on the last day (as opposed to the, frankly, tedium of watching the peleton power up and down the Champs eight times) then it makes sense to arrange matters so that those who want the stage win can give us some thrilling racing without being encumbered by all the GC teams being forced to crowd the front. Everyone saying "God almighty, it's disgusting they've just decided not to race" is ignoring the fact that there are many times in a GT when the majority of teams will decide not to race, when they let a breakaway go, when the sprint teams are given free rein et cetera. The only thing I would disagree with was the removal of the final points at the finish, if the green jersey had still been in play that would have been unfair on the second placed rider. However, apart from tweaking that I thought it worked well and quite possibly gave us a more exciting finish than we would've had without the neutralisation.
@mjvande@pacbell.net Mike Vandeman, is that you?! https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/biking/trial-mike-vandeman/
@No Reply I had the same problem, but it seems to be sorted now.
@No Reply I had the same problem, but it seems to be sorted now.
@JMcWatt This may well be true. Nothing drives me crazy more than cosmetic updates and facelifts that don't really bring any new value about. Maybe they do attract new customers, but also discourage existing ones. I was never a regular customer of CRC, but if I had been, I would surely have been mad seeing confusing changes. If I don't understand the website and have to re-learn the process anyway, why not switch to another shop?
It was such a small things that brought about the ruination of CRC, one decision made by the owners and management. In 2013 the decision was made to redesign the website, this change was the beginning of the end for CRC. They replaced a proven platform that had helped turn a Northern Irish bike shop into the world’s biggest online cycling retailer with a more complex system that never delivered the same growth. Sales momentum stalled, Wiggle overtook them, and within three years CRC was being bought by the rival it had once outperformed. This was very much the strategic mistake that broke the growth engine.
20 thoughts on “Live blog: Video: Cyclist clipped by wing mirror – no action taken; Whoopi Goldberg says bike lanes are “screwing up” New York, Twitter post threatening to “run over” cyclists backfires, important Lance Armstrong lavatory news + more”
It’s funny how some races
It’s funny how some races suit the same couple of riders, particularly in the early season.
Good to see Armstrong has
Good to see Armstrong has found a big job to keep him occupied in retirement
Good to see Armstrong has
double post
That must be why she did The
That must be why she did The Color Purple instead of something greener.
Quote:
Translated as “Some of my best friends are <something>, but <generally I hate that something>”
“I like bikes, I like people
“I like bikes, I like people who ride”
But apparently not enough to keep more of them alive by restricting the dangerous, city choking, pollution spewing motorised traffic to designated road space, which presumably is her preferred method of getting around New York.
Yeah Whoopi, we need to get
Yeah Whoopi, we need to get every one off bikes and into cars to ease the congestion.
Glad you’re okay after that
Glad you’re okay after that pass Barry, terrible driving, expected response by the police, I have zero faith in them after a number of close passes and being knocked off all being caught on camera, they really don’t give a toss.
bike_food wrote:
The article doesn’t say where this happened, does anyone know? Just so that I can avoid an area with worse police than where I live. They failed in their duty to protect the public and that driver is still in charge of his death-dealing weapon.
Likewise, glad Barry survived, with just a few mm difference that could have been hospital or a cemetery.
And Whoopi, it was the drivers who screwed up the city, like they have everywhere, and it’s the cyclists that are curing it.
burtthebike wrote:
It was near Warrington. I’ve just updated the article.
Why anyone would pay any
Why anyone would pay any attention to that raving fucking idiot Whoopi Goldberg, I dont know?
She said of the 13 year old girl who was drugged then raped vaginally and anally by Roman Polanski that it wasnt “rape rape”.
zanf wrote:
Well, she is a member of the Harlem Globetrotters: https://mentalfloss.com/article/74714/meet-10-honorary-harlem-globetrotters
(Guess who my favourite player was?)
Henry Kissinger?
Henry Kissinger?
That driver should not be
That driver should not be allowed on the road again until they have passed a stringent test and have been forced on a bike to experience a series of close passes.
hirsute wrote:
Not something I usually do but have raised it with my local Force, needs a sense of entitlement check.
Could it be one of the popes?
Could it be one of the popes?
ktache wrote:
Close, but I was thinking of an actual player – Squirrel Murrell: http://harlemglobetrotters.wikia.com/wiki/Squirrel_Murrell
Barry’s case… surely that
Barry’s case… surely that can’t be the end of it. Why is there a question of apportioning blame by the insurer. Whats that got to do with the offence?
Is there no higher power that can pick this up and press for answers… Jeremy Vine, Chris Boardman, maybe this esteemed site?
Can I take it that Goldberg’s
Can I take it that Goldberg’s complaints about ‘not being able to make a turn’ are from the perspective of sitting on her fat arse in a car while she attempts to go from one side of the tiny island of Manhatten to another?
She might find that the benefits of daily cycling (maybe combined with some modest intermittent fasting) could be the way to shed those excess kilos and may even cheer her up a bit.
> Probably not a great idea
> Probably not a great idea to plan an attempted murder on social media
Isn’t that a bit like planning to fail? You can plan to murder someone, but if you plan to fail to murder someone, then that isn’t really murder even if you do end up killing the person (as you didn’t intend to).