Our live blog can sometimes be slow to load so please give it some time and if you’re still having no you, perhaps try refreshing your browser.
- News

Live blog: N Yorks campaigner calls for infrastructure not prestige events, Addison Lee plans to put driverless cabs in London by 2021, sneak peek at the new Pinarello gravel bike + more

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
24 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
The problem with Mr Loophole & his ilk, is their ability to ignore the facts whilst still knowing which buttons to press. The cyclist, in the volvo case, probably went poorly prepared to defend his corner (he probably assumed, like most here, that the case would be 'thrown out' by the magistrate), and was overwhelmed by a prosecution using numerous & emotive arguments to bamboozle the opposition.
I am with George on this one. There is no excuse for or legitimate reason behind the levels of hate aimed at Cyclists. Fuelled by the many morons on Social Media. However if we don't treat other road users with respect and ride within the rules of the Highway Code then can we expect others to respect us? Its a 2 way street and everytime a cyclist does something stupid it puts another stick on the fire. Its not right just a reality. It is no excuse for the appallingly low standards of driving and that is not my point. As the old phrase goes people in Glass houses.....
Meanwhile...https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/aug/13/victims-commissioner-road-crime-england-wales
Perhaps you consider posting them occasionally?
I was not excusing the "hate" out there, it is fed by social media and the morons that use it. I was simply saying that if we want the hate to die and reduce then we must individually treat other road users with the respect we want back. I live up a single track road. On more than one occasion I've had cyclists sail past passing places coming towards so we've both had to stop whilst the brain donor on the bike squeezes past on the verge...if they'd have slowed by the passing place I could pull in and they could have accelerated past. Its that sort of twattery that really ticks off the non-cyclists. Its not riding within the Highway Code etc. I fully expect some Road Warrior to answer this with some moronic comment which just proves my point. I despair of a small percentage of our number but we can mitigate at least some of the hate by riding properly and courtesly.
Fabian Cancellara and BMC celebrate tenth anniversary of Swiss star’s Olympic time trial gold medal - Which he won riding a Trek! hmm. So what that he's Swiss, BMC didn't provide the machine. If Trek had done this I could kind of understand it.
@HarrogateSpa the question is: does it encourage Nigel Garage et al. to keep coming back to this site?
No mention of Le Col's financial troubles... Buying a pair of bib shorts might be low risk compared to e.g. a bike, but I would definitely suggest using a credit card if you do buy anything, and be aware that they may not be around to honour returns or warranty claims if you do have problems. (I believe the latest is they have been bought out of administration and are currently trading as usual. They have bought themselves some time, but I suspect they need a significant change to their business model if they want to turn things around, and if that is not forthcoming, that time won't last long.)
I'm not keen on Mr Loophole content, or the other rage bait stuff that road.cc relentlessly serves up. It probably is hard to find enough substantial cycling-related stories to fill a daily blog, but still.
Is the ultimate conclusion/TLDR (too long don't read) of this article simply: If the cyclist had a nice safe segregated cycle lane, I would not have been held up for 15 minutes but was still ultimately going at more than 0mph the whole journey. ? (And yet I won't ever complain about being stuck stationary in queues of motor traffic, even when some of the cars in front of me are much slower than mine and the drivers should get out of the way.)
24 thoughts on “Live blog: N Yorks campaigner calls for infrastructure not prestige events, Addison Lee plans to put driverless cabs in London by 2021, sneak peek at the new Pinarello gravel bike + more”
I do hope both Alex Dowsett
I do hope both Alex Dowsett and Chris Boardman have a punch up to decide this, it’s the only real way to find out who’s most right*
*that and graphs obvs. Everyone knows a graph always wins a debate.
I think we’re beyond graphs.
I think we’re beyond graphs. After St Sir Chris Lord Boardman’s latest vanquishing of the most recent addition to the Order of the Helmets, nothing less than a tapestry will do.
Just how small is the number Alex can count to, or are we really expected to believe that he hears multiple hundreds of stories per day. Also, loads of my friends tell me of the good times they have when pissed, countless stories. Should we make alcohol consumption mandatory?
I say this as someone who had a positive experience of a collision and a helmet, I still don’t think it needs to be compulsory…
Chris Boardman and Superman
Chris Boardman and Superman once had such a heated arguments about helmets that they bet that the loser would wear their underpants on the outside.
Cycling into Manchester (from
Cycling into Manchester (from the North West – Liverpool Street) is a joke at the moment. Roadworks on other nearby roads is forcing too much traffic into too small a volume of roads and the traffic lights at some junctions are just pointless as people just drive through them. Some cyclists too, sure, but absolutely shitloads of cars.
Chris Boardman was banned
Chris Boardman was banned from participating in time trails after the judge sentenced time to life imprisonment.
So if driverless cars a made
So if driverless cars a made to brake if there is an obstruction ahead then surely the safest place to cycle would be in front of one?
Ratfink wrote:
Only if the tech “sees” the cyclist, and that is the nub of the problem with driverless car in a nutshell.
usedtobefaster wrote:
Would take my chances with the tech versus the average Addison Lee driver!
gonedownhill wrote:
Good point …
usedtobefaster wrote:
And in the case or Mercedes cars, whether it chooses to prioritise people inside the car or outside of it.
When Chris Boardman crosses
When Chris Boardman crosses the road, the cars look both ways.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Chris Boardman doesn’t cross the road. The opposite pavement comes to him.
davel wrote:
I was going to ask “why does Chris Boardman cross the road?”, but no-one questions Chris Boardman’s intentions.
hawkinspeter wrote:
There is no ‘Chris Boardman’s intentions’; there is only ‘Chris Boardman does’ and ‘Chris Boardman does not’.
davel wrote:
I heard that Chris Boardman sleeps with a nightlight on – not because he’s afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of him.
.. hang on a min.. the
.. hang on a min.. the ‘Grevil gravel bike’… all I can think of is G G G Granville the G G G Grevil G G G Gravel bike…
.
.
.
… WTF… is that Alex Dowsett, he’s getting everywhere today!
Dowsett vs Boardman sums up
Dowsett vs Boardman sums up the helmet debate; one uses myths, rumours and apocryphal stories, the other uses facts, research and data. ‘Nuff said.
Except perhaps from “shut up Alex until you have the faintest idea what you’re talking about.”
The scary thing is that many
The scary thing is that many are saying, we don’t want compulsion but compulsion via the back door by encouraging people to wear them, all the whilst utterly ignoring the stats both for professional racing types, amateur racers and the ‘others’, also ignoring that head injuries sans helmets riding a bike is massively less than walking, driving and most other activities.
Or maybe types like Dowsett think the 1.3million annually reported head injuries (A figure accepted by the head injury orgs in the UK) are totally false, the c.160,000 hospital admittances from such are also false OR that they are all cyclists?
Given that the official figures are c.3100 serious cyclists injured (and the majority caused by errent motorists) maybe he thinks somehow this number are all head injuries and that somehow even if they were this is a much bigger issue than 160,000 that are admitted to hospital.
As I’ve said elsewhere when you have a ratio greater than 1000:1 if just comparing the admittances alone to 50% of all (seriously) injured cyclists being to the head, to then only promote helmets for people on bikes is not only ludicrous, it’s ignorant of basic stats, ignorant of studies that show the effects of helmet wearing.
It’s insideous creep, sickening and a slippery slope of only making matters worse as we have seen in the UK, in France, in US, in Canada, in Australia, in NZ, basically any country you want to pick that has seen significant increases in helmet wearing or compulsion. Time and again this has been shown to be true.
So we get compulsary helmet wearing and if you don’t, then what, NSW levels of fines that the police only focus on instead of killer drivers, and from that more injuries and deaths of cyclists who are then forced off the roads, more victim blaming by police, government, judges and cycling organisations?
DOWSETT YOU IGNORANT UNEDUCATED CUNT, YOUR WAY MAKES CYCLING MORE DANGEROUS AND PUTS ME AT MORE RISK, GO FUCK YOURSELF!
If I headbutt something then
If I headbutt something then I’d want to be wearing a helmet – I’d stand with Dowsett.
Thing is, I’d rather not headbutt anything at all – Boardman for PM!
2Loose wrote:
For ‘headbutting’, I hear you.
But most definitions of ‘headbutt’ don’t include drivers rear-ending, t-boning or left-hooking you, and helmets are a weird fixation in relation to such situations.
And I’d also rather not head
And I’d also rather not head but anything regardless of my mode of transport or activity.
Dowsett knew the reaction his tweet would get and was just being an attention whore.
The real debate here is how
The real debate here is how has Still Open All Hours ran for as long as Open All Hours? By eck they didn’t make much telly in them days.
Organon wrote:
That’s a tricky one.
Do we go by the time period or the number of series? The original ran from 1973 to 1985 although 1973 was just the pilot episode, so we might want to consider 1976 to 1985. Still Open All Hours has been running since 2013, so that’s just 5 years. If we go by series, then the original only had 4 series and the new one has just started its 5th series.
I can see the arguments carrying on for a long time.