Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Budget: Cash for driverless and electric cars - but no mention of cycling

“Our future vehicles will be driverless, but they’ll be electric first,," says Philip Hammond ...

Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond today repeated the government’s aim to make the UK a world leader in driverless cars – but said electric ones were the most important priority, with more than half a billion pounds allocated to them, including a £400 million charging infrastructure fund.

In his Budget speech at the House of Commons this afternoon, Hammond said of driverless vehicles: “I know Jeremy Clarkson doesn’t like them.

“But there are many other good reasons to pursue this technology, so today we step up our support for it.

“Our future vehicles will be driverless, but they’ll be electric first, and that’s a change that needs to come as soon as possible.

“So we’ll establish a new £400 million charging infrastructure fund, invest an extra £100 million in Plug-In-Car Grant, and £40 million in charging R&D.”

Returning to the subject of Clarkson, he added: “Sorry Jeremy, not the first time you've been snubbed by Hammond and May."

The government has promised to develop "the most advanced regulatory framework for driverless cars in the world."

Initially, it is believed that an amendment to the Road Traffic Act may permit manufacturers to test fully autonomous vehicles on the country’s roads, with approval given on a case-by-case basis.

Lord Adonis, the Labour peer and former Transport Secretary who is now chairman of the National Infrastructure Commission, said investment was needed to make roads suitable for the cars of the future.

He said: “Once the preserve of sci-fi, the driverless car is now tantalisingly close and as companies spend billions developing these new vehicles, we need to turn our attention to the roads they appear on."

On Sunday, Hammond said that driverless cars would be on Britain’s roads by 2021, but confessed he had not ridden in one – something he planned to rectify on a visit to the West Midlands earlier this week.

However, according to the Daily Telegraph, the idea was vetoed by Number 10 due to the potential for the photo-opportunity to give rise to headlines about the government itself being ‘driverless’.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/20/philip-hammonds-plan-trip-dri...

In response to the Budget speech, leader of the opposition Jeremy Corbyn said the government was “investing in driverless cars after months of road-testing back seat driving in government.”

Unsurprisingly, there was no specific mention in the Budget of cycling.

Earlier this week, the Department for Transport announced a new £1.7 billion Transforming Cities Fund to create better links between city centres and suburban areas, though again, with no reference to the role cycling might play within that.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
earth replied to Deeferdonk | 7 years ago
0 likes

Deeferdonk wrote:
carytb wrote:

Deeferdonk wrote:

To be fair, there is 0% VAT on bike fuel (i.e cake)  1

Unfrtunately I think there is as cake is a luxury item. Biscuits however are deemed to be essential and therefore do not attract VAT. It's probable the small cake shop that may not be registered. I recall there was a big legal question some years ago "Is a Jaffa cake a cake or a biscuit m'lud?"

 

If only there was some simple way on the internet to check your facts before incorrectly telling people they are wrong. "No VAT is charged on plain biscuits or cakes. But when a biscuit is covered in chocolate it becomes a luxury and standard rate VAT at 20% is added to the price. Mcvities, the market leaders for Jaffa Cakes added chocolate to the cake and tangy orange base, so classifying them as cakes, not biscuits"

 

Everyone knows they are classified as a cake and not a biscuit because they turn hard when off instead of soggy.

Avatar
jasecd | 7 years ago
8 likes

I imagine the chancellor thinks that bikes are only for children and poor people. \

But well done for the Hammond & May joke. I guess it's fitting as Clarkson is an elitist anachronism who was far more popular a few years ago, much like the Tory party.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to jasecd | 7 years ago
8 likes

Lord Adonis wrote:

" investment was needed to make roads suitable for the cars of the future."

I'd just settle for them being suitable for the transport we currently use.

I'm not really sure why the cars of the future won't be made suitable for our roads rather than vice versa?

Avatar
oldstrath replied to ChrisB200SX | 7 years ago
4 likes

ChrisB200SX wrote:

Lord Adonis wrote:

" investment was needed to make roads suitable for the cars of the future."

I'd just settle for them being suitable for the transport we currently use.

I'm not really sure why the cars of the future won't be made suitable for our roads rather than vice versa?

Because improving the car's safety performance to an acceptable level, even if possible, will cost private companies money that could be profit. Getting the taxpayer to reduce the complexity of the roads transfers the cost nicely, and increases their profit. Exact same reason why cyclists will be driven off the roads.

Remember the Tory party exists to serve the rich and the corporations.

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to ChrisB200SX | 7 years ago
3 likes

ChrisB200SX wrote:

Lord Adonis wrote:

" investment was needed to make roads suitable for the cars of the future."

I'd just settle for them being suitable for the transport we currently use.

I'm not really sure why the cars of the future won't be made suitable for our roads rather than vice versa?

as any fule kno, the cars of the future will levitate electromagnetically above the road surface, so a couple of Scalectrix-like strips will need to run the length of each carriageway. 

 

Pages

Latest Comments