No more to follow… unless there’s something in the small print


No more to follow… unless there’s something in the small print
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
@Rendel Harris I see the average cycling fan protested by snapping up the available tickets immediately.
@RayG Even if the ticket revenues for this event were all going straight into rider safety, which I'll wager they're not, there would still be perfectly relevant questions to be asked as to why the ordinary cycling fan was being stung for the cost rather than it coming out of ASO's €30M profit from the Tour alone and the €130M it makes annually from its race portfolio.
@Daclu Trelub I'm also wondering if they're putting matting down over the setts leading up to the esplanade - imagine the number of potential pre-race retirements if they try to ride slowly over them uphill if it's bucketing down that night! 🫣
@HoarseMann I considered that probability - Just expecting the prime 'mid-priced' seats to have already gone. Not to mention there'll likely be an even bigger strain on the terrible ticketing platform...
@wtjs I went to Clitheroe to watch them freezing their tits off in the rain after weeks of glorious weather. The crash on the lower slopes of Pendle was actually one of the police motorcycle marshals who slid out on the cattle grid on the bend at the foot of the straight climb to the Well Springs.
@saffronsimian dumbest comment of the century.
“They added that the teams will ride from Holyrood Palace up the Royal Mile before reaching Edinburgh Castle, and that the road will be “completely unticketed”.” Only because they can’t close the road and rob peds. Greedy, greedy bastards with their snouts in the trough.
Motornormativity is fuelled by ignorant journalists writing lies for click bait revenue. There is zero redress for this, they just publish any garbage. This is par for the course for antisocial media and the rot it spreads. Complicit are the police, CPS and judges who all drive and read the same garbage. They are not independent thinkers, and have almost zero moral compass where people who use a bicycle are injured by dangerous arrogant drivers. A broad powerful media campaign from the government could address this, but they don't have the courage to do what is morally correct.
@RayG You seem to be suggesting hipocrisy or double standards from the author. But I see no opinion in this article whatsoever, only facts and objective comparison to earlier events. Also, an opening ceremony is much different from an actual road stage.
@Cayo if it was a 'pre-sale' then there would have been a limited number of tickets available. Try again on the 30th when they go on general sale.
8 thoughts on “The 2017 Budget – What’s in it for cycling? Your at-a-glance-guide”
road.cc wrote:
So sweet FA to do with active travel in the budget, then?
Yeah thats about right.
Yeah thats about right.
I waited ages for the article
I waited ages for the article to load before the realisation kicked in…
Very funny road.cc
KevM wrote:
Truth in advertising.
KevM wrote:
Yep – same here..!
hat
hat
Actually, it’s less than
Actually, it’s less than nothing:
“Transport and infrastructure
Acknowledging that congestion was an issue in large parts of the country, Mr Hammond said that some £690million would be made available to tackle traffic problems in urban areas and get local networks moving more freely.”
Going by experience over the past thirty years, that means widening roads, encouraging more driving and actively making things worse for pedestrians and cyclists.
burtthebike wrote:
and no scheme has ever done that and made things worse unless you look at bypasses which local people hate due to the damage it does to the countryside.