Camden Council has received an overwhelmingly positive response to its consultation on the recent Torrington Place/Tavistock Place bike lane trial. 78 per cent of respondents were in favour of making the road one-way for motor vehicles and doubling the space allocated to cyclists.
The 15,000 responses – including 1,387 from residents – constituted the largest ever response to a Camden consultation.
Only 21 per cent were not in favour while 1 per cent had no opinion. Of residents, 61 per cent were in favour, 38 per cent were not in favour and 1 per cent had no opinion.
The council has however made it clear that no decisions will be made until a full analysis of the consultation comments and alternative proposals has been made.
Councillor Phil Jones, Cabinet Member for Regeneration, Transport and Planning, said:
“I would like to thank everyone who took the opportunity to have their say during the consultation. The impressive number of responses received demonstrates the importance that many people, of differing viewpoints, hold with regards to the street layout in this location.
“We are now in the process of fully collating and analysing the responses. Due to the high number it will take officers some time to fully collate and analyse all the views and comments received before we can share the detailed results more widely and use them to inform our final decision.”
Launched in November 2015, the trial saw the corridor of streets that includes Torrington Place, Byng Place, Gordon Square, Tavistock Square and Tavistock Place made primarily eastbound for motor vehicles. A partially segregated cycle lane on the south side of the street was also created in addition to the existing one on the northern side.
Members of the public were asked their opinion on whether to keep the current layout plus improvements such as wider pavements and stepped cycle tracks, or to remove it completely and return the street to two traffic lanes and a single, two-way cycle track.
The Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) has been among those objecting to the plans. The organisation launched a petition asking the council to consider alternative measures.
The LTDA believes there is sufficient space for two-way motor traffic, two-way cycle lanes and improved pedestrian areas.
However, London Cycling Campaign’s infrastructure campaigner, Simon Munk, said:
“The idea that the way it was before is better is ludicrous, the idea that we can fit thousands of cyclists into half the space. They want two-way traffic because it’s slightly easier for them.
“What seems to be happening is the LTDA and cabbies are basically saying improvements to cyclist and pedestrian safety to a hugely popular route are trumped by cabbies having a minor inconvenience.”
But that is exacly why ANPR would be the only solution. both others just choose to dismiss it.
It's unusual in that the original intention was to encourage sympathy with the afflicted (congenital iodine deficiency is the modern term) by...
An inspiration to us all. I hope I'll be riding that well at that age.
Had a Regina Oro block and slotted chain on my Swinnerton 531 back in the day, you can still find them second hand but depending on condition they...
Reminds me of this:
There is obviously a continuum from unpleasantness to abuse to physical violence but the statistics indicate that trans people are significantly...
How about claiming that you're the emperor? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton
Yeah so true, but cyclists...
That's the dictionary definition. You have the wrong word If you don't like him, fine but don't describe him as something he is not.
Or in the Australian vernacular....