Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Local councils accused of undermining Scottish Government cycling targets as cycle lanes scrapped

A number of projects have been halted as a result of local pressure

With news that yet another major cycle project has been halted following a vote by local councillors, Herald Scotland has suggested that councils are “derailing” the Scottish Government's cycle targets.

The Bears Way was set to be a protected cycle-only lane on a commuter route from Milngavie to Glasgow. However, last week SNP, LibDem and independent councillors voted against the Labour-Conservative coalition to prevent the second phase of construction (the vote was 12-11).

Phase 1, from Burnbrae roundabout to Hillfoot along the A81, is already complete, but a petition signed by 2,600 locals is calling for even this to be ripped up.

24-hour automatic counters have been installed to monitor usage and an average of over a thousand cycle trips a week were made between November 2015 and June 2016.

This stretch was also recently recognised for 'Achievements in Cycling' at the Scottish Transport Awards.

Despite this, feelings have run so high that death threats have targeted both local cyclists and council employees involved in the development and the lane’s complete removal seems possible.

In Edinburgh, a working group is being set up to try and resolve issues with the City Centre West to East Link – formerly known as the Roseburn to Leith Walk cycle route. Uncertainty surrounds its exact route following pressure from residents angry at a potential loss of road space.

We also reported yesterday that an Ayrshire bike lane is to be ripped out. Although the kerb protected cycle track has not technically removed any road capacity or parking spaces, an unprecedented level of opposition put pressure on local councillors to vote that it be removed.

Local cyclist and Cycling UK campaigner, Drew Moyes, arguably got to the nub of the problem when he told road.cc: “We don’t know whether or not, by taking it out, they intend to reinstate the previous path, which was usually filled with parked cars, meaning that cyclists were continually leapfrogging parked vehicles and into the traffic lane.”

Just over a week ago, campaigners in Scotland renewed calls for investment in infrastructure after government statistics revealed that cycling levels had dropped. The 'Transport and Travel in Scotland' report found that only 1.2 per cent of all journeys were made by bike in 2015, down from 1.4 per cent the previous year.

The government’s stated aim is for 10 per cent of all trips to be made by bike by 2020.

In a recent Holyrood debate, MSP Mark Ruskell said that even a small shift to cycling could have a positive effect.

“Although data on direct carbon emissions is inconclusive, the impact of even a slight modal shift to walking and cycling for short journeys makes a valuable contribution to our stumbling progress in reducing transport emissions in Scotland.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
irc | 7 years ago
1 like

". You don't convert drivers to cyclists without clear cycling infrastructure."

 

Who says drivers want to convert to cycling? The vast majority don't want to cycle.  As for cycle lanes not causing congestion. Segregated lanes taking away two lanes of a 4 lane road already a capacity do. Unless there is some magic pixie dust effect.

 

I'm all for appropriate cycling provision. Bearsway 2 wasn't it.

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to irc | 7 years ago
4 likes

irc wrote:

". You don't convert drivers to cyclists without clear cycling infrastructure."

 

Who says drivers want to convert to cycling? The vast majority don't want to cycle.  As for cycle lanes not causing congestion. Segregated lanes taking away two lanes of a 4 lane road already a capacity do. Unless there is some magic pixie dust effect.

 

I'm all for appropriate cycling provision. Bearsway 2 wasn't it.

 

You have to make things appealing, lure people in on a range of levels - they don't have to 'want to be converted'.

 

 

Avatar
irc | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm pleased the councilors listened to their electorate.  As a cyclist I don't like Bearsway Part 1. Ok going south but going north means crossing the ongoing, often very busy, traffic flow twice for the sake of a mile or so of lane. Hence why around 10% of cyclists choose not to use it.  Due to the remaining road being much narrower the choice of not using the lane often results in hassle from driver.  With the old on road lanes this wasn't an issue.  The old lanes needed a better surface and parking restrictions in a couple of places, otherwise fine.

 

As for Bearsway 2 - unlike phase 1 it would involve going through a couple of junctions which are already at capacity much of the day - Boclair Road, and West Chaplton Ave.  Halving the road capacity would cause chaos.  Not an issue on Bearsway 1 where the road was already 1 vehicle lane in each direction.

 

Unlike Bearsway 1 which causes slight delay Bearsway 2 would result in major delays to the 18000 motor vehicles a day for the sake of the 150 or so cyclists a day that use it. Overkill.  For an experienced cyclist the section where Bearsway 2 would go is not a problem. Take the LH lane and traffic flows past in the RH lane.

Novice or child cyclists should be coped with by a shared ped/bike lane on one of the footways. They carry very little pedestrian traffic and it would work Ok. Leaving faster commuting cyclists to use the existing 4 lane road.

 

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to irc | 7 years ago
5 likes

irc wrote:

I'm pleased the councilors listened to their electorate.  As a cyclist I don't like Bearsway Part 1. Ok going south but going north means crossing the ongoing, often very busy, traffic flow twice for the sake of a mile or so of lane. Hence why around 10% of cyclists choose not to use it.  Due to the remaining road being much narrower the choice of not using the lane often results in hassle from driver.  With the old on road lanes this wasn't an issue.  The old lanes needed a better surface and parking restrictions in a couple of places, otherwise fine.

 

As for Bearsway 2 - unlike phase 1 it would involve going through a couple of junctions which are already at capacity much of the day - Boclair Road, and West Chaplton Ave.  Halving the road capacity would cause chaos.  Not an issue on Bearsway 1 where the road was already 1 vehicle lane in each direction.

 

Unlike Bearsway 1 which causes slight delay Bearsway 2 would result in major delays to the 18000 motor vehicles a day for the sake of the 150 or so cyclists a day that use it. Overkill.  For an experienced cyclist the section where Bearsway 2 would go is not a problem. Take the LH lane and traffic flows past in the RH lane.

Novice or child cyclists should be coped with by a shared ped/bike lane on one of the footways. They carry very little pedestrian traffic and it would work Ok. Leaving faster commuting cyclists to use the existing 4 lane road.

 

 

The idea here, and everywhere else, is to reduce motor vehicle capacity and increase cycling. You don't do that by running away from the issue. It's myopic and does nothing to get new, wary cyclists on the road. You don't convert drivers to cyclists without clear cycling infrastructure. Only experienced cyclists complain about bad roads - because they know roads are bad - because they cycle. No-one else gives a toss. 

All studies support this. Cycle lanes causing congestion is myth.

 

Those 18,000 vehicles - polluting the place, wrecking the roads, causing congestion - they are the issue. Time to grow a pair and tackle the issue. Convert 1000's of them into cyclists. Then congestion improves. Population is growing. People cannot continue to commute recklessly and unconscientiously .

Avatar
LankyEdinburgh | 7 years ago
1 like

A bit more wide ranging than that petition — please share this page http://www.facebook.com/walkcyclevote/with as many people as you can. As Kim says, local elections are coming up. We need to try and persuade as many people as possible to take cycle infrastructure seriously.

Avatar
bigmoose | 7 years ago
1 like

Signed and shared. 500 signatures in the first 10 hours. Great news! Keep it going. 

I live near this and I concur completely with unconstituted's observations on the people in question. Outwardly playing the respectable middle class card but shouting down debate at a public meeting and even threatening to murder people on bikes or people who work for the council. I find that vile and utterly unacceptable in a supposedly civilised society. 

Well done to those who initiated the petition. A positive and peaceful action. 

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
1 like

Link a bit dodgy. Try this:

 

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/complete-the-bearsway-project

 

Signed of course, shared to friends. My other half also wants to commute to work by bike, but it's too hairy at the moment from where we are. We need proper cycle paths from every direction into the city centre to get less experienced riders on the move. 

Avatar
WiznaeMe | 7 years ago
1 like

I drive along Milngavie Road a number of times a day.  There is actually only one frequent bus, (frequent unbearable holdup apparently), the 60A, and it's every fifteen minutes.  Hardly central London.  Traffic still moves at 30mph as it has always done.  

My wife intended to get on a bike for the first time in ten years once this cycle way reached a local park and she could then be segregated from traffic as far as the city centre.  My wife will now remain in her car.  

I have copied a page from the Facebook page asking for those who support cycling lanes to do so.  Please sign the petition to support other cyclists from the G62 postcode.  (If my cut and paste works!)

Friends Of Bears Way.

A local resident has set up a petition to the council to complete the Bears Way cycle lane as soon as legally possible. If you live in the area, please sign. If you don't live in the area, but you think this is important, please sign. This is much bigger than one lane. This is the future of cycle infrastructure nationwide. Please share far and wide using whatever means you can. https://you.38degrees.org.uk/…/complete-the-bearsway-projec…

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 7 years ago
1 like

 “We don’t know whether or not, by taking it out, they intend to reinstate the previous path, which was usually filled with parked cars, meaning that cyclists were continually leapfrogging parked vehicles and into the traffic lane.”

 Why not reinstate the previous cycle lanes BUT with the rubber kerbstones left over from the ripped up lane? Row machine protester gets his status quo back (almost). Cyclist get a lane that is protected by kerbs so doesn't become a car park...

Hang on, this bloody minded metal-boxers, we're talking about - some (4x4s, transits)would probably still park in the lane and now you have to leapfrog the parked vehicles and the kerb. surprise     

Avatar
kitkat | 7 years ago
4 likes

In time New South Wales residents will look at Scotland and think; "poor cyclists. I'd never move there"

Avatar
Sherpamagoo | 7 years ago
7 likes

So we live in a country where the national government overrules the county council and local opinion to allow fracking in Lancashire but when it comes to cycling infrastructure local councillors have the final say.

This country is becoming more mental by the day

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 7 years ago
0 likes

Maybe they need to consider an alternative approach, where cycleroutes are unravelled from roads. Or just make all aurban roads 20mph and paint sharrows everywhere.

Avatar
ktache | 7 years ago
3 likes

I think that if you are aiming for 10% then you should be spending 10% of infrastructure budget on it.  Anything else is just platitude.  If you build it they will come.  Difficult with these NIMBYs mind.

And giving into the idiot rower sets a very dangerous precident.

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
3 likes

From what I could tell on social media at the time of the local Milngavie council meetings, it was a riot. NIMBYs screaming people down. Raw, irrational aggression. They wouldn't listen to anything. Councillors sent in lackeys - too scared to face the mob, which made it even worse of course as they couldn't get at their intended targets. 

 

Honestly, people think I'm exaggerating or taking the piss when I talk about Scotland and how regressive the older generation are, you got no clue. They're mental throwbacks, and they've taught their sprogs the same.

 

The younger NEDs aren't so much an issue though, yes on the street, but they don't stop shit happening, they don't go to council meetings and object to stuff, mostly. It's the mid 40s + and it gets progressively worse the older they are. It's not just the lesser educated, who get  blamed for everything, unfairly in my view - the tweedy lot are just as regressive. They wear thick brown pants because they shit themselves everytime some has a progressive idea. It is known.

 

Utter throwbacks. Funnily enough, it's a tiny persistent minority of the same generations who're trying to make this sort of progress happen. Feel bad for them - they must feel totally out of touch with their own generation. Way ahead of their time. Have to thank them for trucking on, because I'd have either nuked whole sections of the country or moved by now.

Avatar
Kim | 7 years ago
0 likes

The irrational reaction to these safe cycle lanes is worrying. The NIMBY's are making a lot of claims about them which are without any evidence to support them. Sadly with local elections coming up in May next year there are a number local Councillors who are willing to listen to reason or evidence. The strangest thing is the reaction of SNP Councillors who are deliberately undermining their your parties policy. This is negative for the whole of Scotland and the SNP should be ashamed of this behaviour, it is the sort of thing which the Lib Dem's have been pushed my the votes for, all parties should wary of.

Latest Comments