UK 'interested' in minimum passing distance law, says government

Could cyclists have the same protection in law here as in Australia?

A legal safe passing law in the UK might come under consideration in the future, according to the minister for roads and cycling, whp said the Government was "interested" in a law.

Robert Goodwill made the surprising claim in an answer to a Parliamentary Question from Alberto Costa, Tory MP for South Leicestershire.

The question tabled was “To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Government's response on the e-petition entitled, ‘To introduce a permanent, minimum passing distance when overtaking cyclists’, what assessment his Department is planning of cycle passing spaces in South Australia and by when he plans to complete that assessment.”

To this, Mr Goodwill responded: “The introduction of a legally enforceable minimum passing distance between cyclists and other vehicles in South Australia is relatively recent. As a result, there is limited information available regarding the impacts both positive and negative following this change in the law. As with other changes of this type introduced overseas, we remain interested in the change and are keeping it under review.

The Highway Code already has a requirement for motorists to give cyclists plenty of room when overtaking.”

This ‘plenty of room’ definition was the subject of the e-petition, started by a Tony Martin, who stated: "The lack of a clear specification may result in a personal decision what a "plenty of room" means in terms of distance. Therefore, introducing a minimum legal passing distance when overtaking cyclists will considerably reduce the number of cyclist casualties, aiding in a safe cycling practice. Suggestion of 3.28 ft (1 m) when overtaking cyclists on roads with speed limits up to and including 30mph. On roads with higher speed limits, the minimum passing distance should be 4.9 ft (1.5 m).”

According to BikeBiz, in response to Martin's petition the Government said it "currently does not have plans to legislate on a set minimum space e.g. 1 metre on roads with a speed limit of up to 30mph when overtaking a cyclist."

The answer added: "This type of legislation would be extremely difficult to enforce and the Government does not believe that it would add to the existing rules and guidance, including those set out in the Highway Code, which advises drivers to give cyclists “at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car”.

However, "we are keeping this position under review," said the Government and is "interested in learning from the experience of places where legislation of this type has been introduced. One example is South Australia, where since 25th October 2015, drivers are required to give a minimum of one metre when passing a cyclist where the speed limit is 60km/h (37.3mph) or less or 1.5 metres where the speed limit is over 60km/h (40mph). The penalty for drivers caught disobeying this rule is a $287 (£148) fine, plus a $60 (£31) victim of crime levy and 2 demerit (penalty) points."

The Government said it "will take time to understand the benefits and impacts of this legislation on cyclists and other road users.”

A number of countries have laws relating to a legal minimum passing distance. As of February last year, drivers in Tasmania have been obliged to allow one metre between their vehicle and a cyclist on roads up to and including 60km/h, and 1.5 metres on roads above 60 km/h with a public information film getting the message across in memorable and entertaining fashion.

Here in the UK, BikeBiz editor Carlton Reid produced a video in which Chris Boardman explained how to safely overtake a cyclist. The video, which also featured cycling club Exeter Wheelers and master driving instructor Blaine Walsh, demonstrated how much room a cyclist or group of riders need, and why they might need it.


After an unpromising start, having to be bribed by her parents to learn to ride without stabilisers, Sarah became rather keener on cycling in her university years, and was eventually persuaded to upgrade to proper road cycling by the prospect of a shiny red Italian bike, which she promptly destroyed by trapping a pair of knickers in the rear derailleur. Sarah writes about about cycling every weekend on

Latest Comments

  • pockstone 0 sec ago

    Stand down Gareth Hunt..your years of sterling service in the rhyming slang department were much appreciated. We now have a far more apt replacement.

  • Dhill 3 min 5 sec ago

    Don’t know on that point. Holland traditionally use cycling more for transport, so may be they are more accepted by others whom are out and about....

  • fukawitribe 4 min 22 sec ago

    Really ? Not on here that's for sure at any significant velocity, even given the almost completely meaningless 'effective in a collision with a...

  • fukawitribe 26 min 23 sec ago

    So your comment was about cranks primarily then, which has an element of truth in it, not the "thin walled alloy frames and wheels" you mention...

  • Sriracha 28 min 38 sec ago

    I'd be keen to know especially, how quickly do they return to clear when you cycle into the shadows?

  • Compact Corned Beef 35 min 46 sec ago

    Heavens. Pretty sure I'm now obliged by some sort of local bylaw to say you could buy a car for that. *...

  • TheBillder 47 min 49 sec ago

    Have the freewheel pawls broken? This has happened to me on two separate wheels: one Fulcrum Racing Sport db (came with bike) and one Alex Rims /...

  • TheBillder 55 min 5 sec ago

    I'm no expert and can't help on the value or mending the frame, but I think the decal on the seat tube is 1989 onwards and if the brakes are...

  • cqexbesd 1 hour 7 min ago

    I don't think its It may however be Youtube and the settings used by the uploader - the original footage might be clearer. One thing I...

  • hirsute 1 hour 21 min ago

    Had a new one today. 30mph down hill in a 30. Got overtaken on a narrowish road with oncoming traffic ! Wasn't in primary as I didn't think it...