Sir Dave Brailsford insists that there is no ‘culture of fear’ at British Cycling and says he will co-operate with the independent review set up to examine allegations of bullying and discrimination in the wake of technical director Shane Sutton’s resignation last week.
Brailsford was performance director at Great Britain from 2003 to 2014, when he left to focus full-time on his role with Team Sky. Sutton, who had worked alongside Brailsford as Team GB’s cyclists dominated the track events at the Beijing and London Olympics, replaced him at the helm of the national team.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday, Brailsford said: “It’s really good that this inquiry has been brought in, so we can establish the truth.
“I’m not going to go into the details. What I will do is I’ll share everything that I know with that inquiry.”
He said it was necessary “to get to the bottom of” the allegations. “They need to be heard, they need to be documented properly and addressed properly.”
Besides claims of sexism by track sprinter Jess Varnish – the subject of a separate internal investigation –Darren Kenny alleged that Sutton referred to him and other para-cyclists as “gimps and wobblies.” A number of other riders have said they suffered bullying or discrimination.
But he maintained: “The British Cycling model wasn’t based around motivation through fear or performance through fear.
“It was all around an athlete-centred model. We had a forensic psychiatrist, who was absolutely brilliant, that was in that programme.
“We ran a model which was very much about ownership and trying to give the riders as much ownership as possible over their careers.
“You can’t get performance on a continuous basis over a long period of time through fear. I just don’t believe it.”
The psychiatrist Brailsford mentioned was Dr Steve Peters, who also left British Cycling in April 2014, with their departure in hindsight removing a vital counterbalance to Sutton’s often abrasive approach.
Brailsford added: “When you’re in a leadership position like that you have a responsibility to athletes and the care of athletes, more than anything else, and the welfare of those athletes.
“And of course you’re going to push hard in those environments, but I’ll always be open to learn anything I can.”
Due to report back after the Rio Olympic Games this summer, the independent review is being led by British Rowing chair Annamarie Phelps. Its terms of reference were revealed last Friday.
> Phelps to chair British Cycling review as more riders speak for and against Sutton
Add new comment
2 comments
It's also quite possible to support athletes who are part of your programme while actively ignoring things that would benefit those who aren't (see again Cooke, more recently King etc...).
The problem is that is genuinely a trade-off between getting the best out of your (in house) athletes and winning the most medals (by supporting the best whether they're yours the whole time or for a few weeks every 4 years).
It seems likely that BC has been pretty heavy handed in stacking the cards for its own people and this shows up most in the women's road programme since BC doesn't have one (past junior level).
As I found out yesterday by a blog that someone posted on Facebook, British Cycling were investigated in 2012. That was well publicized!
As I have said many times over the last week, read The Breakaway by Nicole Cooke. There is/was more wrong at BC than bullying/sexism etc.