Renault's chief executive, Carlos Ghosn, says the first semi-autonomous vehicles will appear this year with a fully autonomous car expected to be on the market by 2020. However, he also said that cyclists were proving one of the biggest stumbling blocks when it came to refining the new technology.
"One of the biggest problems is people with bicycles, because they don’t respect any rules usually,” said Ghosn.
He told CNBC that cyclists ‘confuse’ driverless cars. “From time-to-time they behave like pedestrians and from time-to-time they behave like cars.”
In August, a cyclist doing a trackstand paralysed a Google self-driving car as it struggled to judge whether the rider was in motion or not. If in doubt, the car remains stationary, leading to a bizarre standoff between the two.
Google patent reveals how driverless cars recognise hand signals
Jason Torrance, policy director at Sustrans, reminded Ghosn that it was Renault’s responsibility to develop a product fit for use.
"Advocates of driverless cars often forget that people live next to roads and use them regularly, so safety must be prioritised, especially when normal unpredictable and legal human behaviour comes into contact with driverless machines."
One of the main issues with driverless technology thus far has been the degree of caution which is necessarily built into the software – the incident involving the cyclist above being a case in point.
Volvo to accept full responsibility for collisions caused by its driverless cars
A recent study by the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute concluded that accident rates are twice as high for driverless cars as for regular cars, but the majority of incidents involve the driverless car being hit from behind in a slow-speed crash by a human driver unaccustomed to a vehicle being driven so cautiously.
There has even been a case of one of Google's cars being pulled over for driving too slowly – moving at 24mph in a busy 35mph zone, traffic was backing up behind.
Dmitri Dolgov, principal engineer of Google’s driverless cars project says the firm is now looking to make its cars more ‘aggressive’ while still operating according to traffic laws. He argues that this is necessary so that they can fit into traffic more naturally.
via Bikebiz
It came in at the same time as using the word "unprecedented", no wonder you didn't see it coming. Oh, and how any time something is being opposed...
I don't think that there is any confusion or lack of clarity between the rules and the guidance but it is a point of difference that interests me...
Yup, that was my conclusion too. And it's a classic example of why the HWC says that drivers should NOT flash their headlights to invite another...
98th in a Grand Tour when you're still crocked ain't bad. Have to wonder what he could achieve if he does get back to full fitness. Big if of course.
Yes, but highly unlikely that this was caused by cyclists or walkers. Cannop ponds are easily accessible by car, and I'm 99% certain that the...
I don't think so. A lot of people don't want to go tubeless and a lot of people won't be able to use their favourite tyres on this TCR. And I doubt...
Ive got a Q/Roo sr5 and absolutley love it. Got it at a great price even got a free crank set upgrade to Dura ace. Ultegra di2 Hed 60 wheelset...
I'd look no further than a Triban RC520 105 disc....
So much wrong with the mask story. Why would the government want to introduce new rules when they can neither explain nor enforce the ones they...
Looks like the 2 opposing camps will have to agree to differ- some of us would rather pull off our own heads than go tubeless, in the same way as...