Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Coroner: Lorry driver "would not have expected" to encounter cyclist he killed

David O'Connell lost life in collision on A40 in Gloucestershire last January...

A coroner has said that a lorry driver “would not have expected” to encounter a cyclist he ran over and killed on the A40 in Gloucestershire in January this year.

David O’Connell, aged 42 and from Gloucester, died as a result of multiple injuries sustained when he was hit by an articulated lorry driven by Parcel Force driver Martin Ashford, reports the Gloucestershire Echo.

The newspaper says that the driver told Gloucester Coroner’s Court he was joining the dual carriageway A40 from a slip road off the M5 when he spotted a reflector on Mr O’Connell’s bike.

He said he could not avoid hitting the cyclist because of vehicles in the outside lane as he joined the road at a speed of 45 miles an hour.

Collision investigator Sergeant David Parry, who attended the scene, told the court that the weather was poor on the night in question.

He said: "Multiple pieces of the bike were spread across both lanes and although visibility was good, driving rain was blowing from left to right.

"Mr Ashford would have been looking forward and in his mirrors to gauge when it was safe to join the flow of traffic.

"But in the late evening, he would not have been expecting to see a cyclist travelling on that piece of dual carriageway.

"Mr O'Connor had earlier been seen to have red lights at the back of his bike and he was wearing a high visibility jacket.

"He was there to be seen but the collision occurred when Mr Ashford looked but failed to see him.

“This could have been due to a combination of the rain and the glare from oncoming vehicles in the Cheltenham-bound carriageway."

Under the Highway Code, the only roads from which cyclists are banned are motorways. Motorists are also required to adapt their driving according to the conditions.

The inquest heard that Mr O’Connell, who worked as a parking attendant in Cheltenham, had been diagnosed with mild epilepsy and had been warned on medical grounds not to ride his bike on busy roads.

However, his condition does not appear to have been a contributing factor in the incident.

Coroner Katy Skerrett, recording the cause of death as a road traffic accident, said: “Mr Ashford would not have expected a cyclist to be on that road at that time of night and did not see him until it was too late to take avoiding action."

Duncan Dollimore, road safety and legal campaigns officer at national cyclists’ charity CTC, told road.cc: “If the lorry driver was unable to see Mr O’Connell until it was too late to avoid him, that rather suggests he was driving too fast for the conditions.

“Rather than deflecting blame to the cyclist the question to ask is why the driver did not slow down if driving rain hindered his vision.

“Unfortunately the focus seems to have been the actions of the cyclist rather than why the driver was unable to see a cyclist with a rear light and a high visibility jacket.

“The message to cyclists seems to be that a driver’s duty of care to vulnerable road users does not apply on busy A-roads where they are, apparently, not expected to be!”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

41 comments

Avatar
patg | 9 years ago
3 likes

Can anyone explain why the lorry driver wouldn't expect another road user to be on the road?  Is that a legitimate explanation?  Speed should never exceed that of your ability to see what's ahead.  I suggest contacting the coroner about her decision at her email address:  Coroners.office [at] gloucestershire.gov.uk 
You can find her contact information here:  http://www.coronersociety.org.uk/local_coroners__offices/8872
She's inferring the cyclist is at fault and that the driver should not be held accountable for either inattention or driving too fast - one of which killed this man.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

there is/was a TRO on that road and of the roads i know that is one of two i would never ride, it is a two lane motorway in all but name and there is an alternative that is only a little longer but takes the same route. The motorway intersection is designed incredibly badly designed if you have anything other than cars and trucks, sight lines. Incidentally the other road is the A417 from the air ballon to where it meets this road. 

Avatar
giskard replied to mrmo | 9 years ago
1 like

mrmo wrote:

there is/was a TRO on that road and of the roads i know that is one of two i would never ride, it is a two lane motorway in all but name and there is an alternative that is only a little longer but takes the same route. The motorway intersection is designed incredibly badly designed if you have anything other than cars and trucks, sight lines. Incidentally the other road is the A417 from the air ballon to where it meets this road. 

Temporary Restraining Order?

??

Avatar
mrmo replied to giskard | 9 years ago
0 likes

giskard wrote:

mrmo wrote:

there is/was a TRO on that road and of the roads i know that is one of two i would never ride, it is a two lane motorway in all but name and there is an alternative that is only a little longer but takes the same route. The motorway intersection is designed incredibly badly designed if you have anything other than cars and trucks, sight lines. Incidentally the other road is the A417 from the air ballon to where it meets this road. 

Temporary Restraining Order?

??

Traffic regulation Order, that specifcally banned cycles. It may have expired, but it is something that keeps cropping up. 

 

Avatar
JonD replied to mrmo | 9 years ago
3 likes
mrmo wrote:

giskard wrote:

mrmo wrote:

there is/was a TRO on that road and of the roads i know that is one of two i would never ride, it is a two lane motorway in all but name and there is an alternative that is only a little longer but takes the same route. The motorway intersection is designed incredibly badly designed if you have anything other than cars and trucks, sight lines. Incidentally the other road is the A417 from the air ballon to where it meets this road. 

Temporary Restraining Order?

??

Traffic regulation Order, that specifcally banned cycles. It may have expired, but it is something that keeps cropping up. 

 

On the A3 here in surrey much of it is 3 lane and similarly a motorway in all but name. There are, however, signs directing cyclists how to cross slip roads (in particular the m25 junction) - I wouldn't want to ride on it but tonight I saw a guy on my side cycling northbound outside the white edge marking. But the fact remains it is *not* a motorway.

'Not expected to be there' is a fucking cop-out. As mentioned, could equally have been a broken down vehicle - or motorcyclist with fueling/engine troubles.

Avatar
rnick | 9 years ago
6 likes

A shameful verdict.  Lights, bright clothing and apparently good visibility.....but it's acceptable in the eyes of the law to run someone over as "they were not expected".   I do wonder if similar verdicts are to be made if you were to hit a pedestrian, we can be fairly certain it does not apply if you were to pass a traffic enforcement van at speed.  The coroner and CPS should be embarassed. 

Perhaps the coroner can now issue guidance on those roads and those times of the day when a cyclist might expect to be encountered??

Avatar
Airzound | 9 years ago
7 likes

This is a joke right?

This a f*****g disgrace.

Avatar
STiG911 | 9 years ago
9 likes

So if he'd hit a car and caused more carnage that've been a disaster but it's fine because he only hit a cyclist that he COULDNT EXPECT TO BE THERE?!?!

Fuck.

Off. 

Avatar
workhard | 9 years ago
12 likes

"he would not have been expecting to see a cyclist travelling on that piece of dual carriageway"

That's alright then. Ony a dead cyclist. Move along. Nothing to see.

Avatar
oldstrath | 9 years ago
9 likes

I don't  suppose there's  any possibility  that whoever is responsible for arseholes such as this buffoon of a coroner will discipline her. Or maybe just get her tested for senility?

Avatar
robert posts child | 9 years ago
8 likes

Sigh. Anything or anyone can be on the road....we dont expect pedestrians on motorways but they are there from time to time, even tho they ought not to be. Cyclists are legally allowed on roads and somehow its a surpise?

Pages

Latest Comments