Astana’s Vincenzo Nibali has been thrown out of the Vuelta a Espana after being caught on film taking a tow from a team car during yesterday’s Stage 2 to Caminito del Rey.
The Italian, winner of the race in 2010 and one of only six men to have won all three of cycling’s Grand Tours, was caught behind a big crash with around 30 kilometres remaining.
As he tried to limit his losses, helicopter footage showed the Italian at the front of a group of around 20 riders looking to chase back on to the peloton with 17 kilometres or so remaining when his Astana team car drew level with him.
Nibali then held on to the car as it accelerated away from the group he was riding with, the images beamed around the world.
While riders will often take advantage of a so-called sticky bottle offered from a team car to help them rejoin the group after a crash, puncture or mechanical incident, commissaires regularly turn a blind eye so long as the assistance is not too blatant.
In Nibali’s case yesterday, however, the aerial footage clearly shows the advantage he gained – and one denied to the other members of the group who were also battling to rejoin the race.
– Vuelta Stage 2: Orica-GreenEdge's Esteban Chaves wins and takes race lead
In a statement, race organisers Unipublic said: “Basing their decision on television images clearly showing an infringement of the rules, the Vuelta race commissaires decided to take him out of the race,” organisers said in a statement.”
The chief commissaire on the race, Bruno Valcic, added: “The film shows clearly that Nibali was clinging to the car for 200 metres.”
Astana sports director Alexander Sheffer has also been expelled from the race, while the team’s second support car will not be allowed to follow the next two stages.
The Kazakh team said it “is sorry for the error, and apologises to the peloton and race organisers for the harm these televised images caused to professional cycling.”

50 thoughts on “Video: Vincenzo Nibali thrown off Vuelta after being towed by team car”
It gets more comical the more
It gets more comical the more I watch it.
Leodis wrote:It gets more
Your not wrong. Lmao. Seriously go to you tube and watch it, the mans got rocks in his head.
What a year for Astana
But
What a year for Astana =))
But a shame to lose Nibali like this, it would have been great viewing seeing how and if he’ll claw that time back. All sorts of rules usually get bent to allow riders to get to the peleton after a crash or mechanical. I imagine its quite difficult to work out what you can and cannot do.
Scoob_84 wrote:
it would have
I think Astanas methods for “clawing time back” are fairly clear – the lack of contrition was pretty disgusting – remind me why they have a UCI licence again.
SoBinary wrote:Scoob_84
Still makes more interesting viewing with these pantomime villaines in the mix
SoBinary wrote:Scoob_84
Because they have enough money to pay off the UCI.
Iamnot Wiggins wrote:SoBinary
Because they have enough money to pay off the UCI.— Scoob_84
Presumably they had enough left over to pay off the Licence Commission who gave them the licence against the wishes of the UCI…
fukawitribe wrote:Iamnot
Because they have enough money to pay off the UCI.— SoBinary
Presumably they had enough left over to pay off the Licence Commission who gave them the licence against the wishes of the UCI…— Scoob_84
I wouldn’t believe all you read about the UCI, they don’t really have the best track record, do they.
I suspect Niballi did this on
I suspect Niballi did this on purpose.
Knowing that his slim chance of leading Astana’s team were now blown and that he would have to play second fiddle to Fabio Aru I reckon he did this so he could have the next 3 weeks off.
Sounds odd. But it sounds very like Astana.
He had to hold onto the car
He had to hold onto the car to steady his arm…its very difficult to use an hypodermic needle otherwise.
mrchrispy wrote:He had to
Surely there is no need for such things. I hear the steak is rather good in Spain this time of year.
Makes a Froome double a bit more likely. I’m sure that will be popular with some on the forum.
bikeboy76 wrote:mrchrispy
You are correct there should be no need, however the actions of the dopers and the inaction of the UCI leave the sport with an unfortunate legacy, that often seems to offer a sanctuary of sorts for the guilty and to sadly cast doubt upon those who have never failed a dope test. And creates very high levels of scepticim.
“I hear the steak is rather good in Spain this time of year.” Very probably, Contador loves the stuff, however didn’t he fail a dope test on the subject?
“Makes a Froome double a bit more likely” Froomey has never failed a test presented suspicious sats and has been extrenly open in providing information ( Even though the army of armchair experts out there do not appear to have a clue how to interpret them) with more to come apparently, I therefore suggest that one is only likley to be popular with those with delusions of expertise.
He seemed to be going well
He seemed to be going well and was going to get back in. For all we know the car could have pulled along side, Nibali holds on to talk then the DS decides to speed up. Pretty daft from Nibali but taking a tow at that speed is pretty scary, the bike becomes very sensitive and hard to control. The DS is more responsible.
Punishment should have been last place for the day and a fine and kick off the driver only. That would have been enough.
My first thought after only
My first thought after only reading the news was “Meh, it can’t be THAT bad. Everyone does that”.
My first though after watching the video afterwards was: “WTF, that was worse than I could even imagine!”
It’s ridiculous that Astana are even trying to defend Nibali, he totally deserved being thrown out of the race. You have to give credit to him, though: it takes skill and a great deal of bravery to ride like that 😀
Well I thought he’d get
Well I thought he’d get pinged for it. Big fine plus some time added. But I think DQ is harsh. And it mars the race.
Is this classed as motor
Is this classed as motor doping?
This happens regulalrly on
This happens regulalrly on Road.cc: VIDEO: and no video.
Cooks wrote:This happens
https://twitter.com/Eurosport_FR/status/635520041585373184/video/1
Cooks wrote:This happens
Sorry Cooks – there is a setting that needs to be changed for YouTube video to display on the site that didn’t get clicked this time … it should be showing now.
It is a shame…I like to
It is a shame…I like to watch Nibali ride…aggressive, opportunist and just very good.
Astana though, they are like a naughty child who, no matter what he does ends up getting in trouble. I guess they would love a month or two where there was nothing worth reporting about them except maybe a couple of wins…but when you employ dopers…
I agree with some of the
I agree with some of the views above (about him doing it on purpose) he is a great bike rider but seems to have the temperament of a petulant child, I don’t think playing second fiddle to Aru is something that sits comfortably with him so maybe the possibility of getting kicked off the race arose yesterday and he took advantage of it.
It was quite funny watching
It was quite funny watching his little tantrum when his support team eventually got to him with a spare bike after the big crash too. He probably guilted them into giving him a tow as he lost so much time just standing in the middle of the road waiting for a bike.
It was the act of a desperate
It was the act of a desperate man, but I think it shows what lengths he is willing to go to.
It does seem crazy that he thought he could get away with this. Can you imagine if other contenders had team cars ride them up the road to compete at the front end. Where would it stop?! He talks about a 10 minute penalty, but if you accept that why would you bother.
He should have just taken the bad luck and gotten on with things. It does put Ritchie Porte’s Giro into perspective.
Colin Peyresourde wrote:It
Indeed a 10 minute penalty means nothing if you plan to be towed by a car!
A bit of leniency could be
A bit of leniency could be given in this case. I like to see the race between the GC riders unfold in racing situations, not due to bad luck being caught behind crashes and getting punctures. Its a shame as the vuelta now loses one of its aggressive riders before its really started.
Scoob_84 wrote:A bit of
Getting in the slip stream of various team cars – Fine.
The occasional sticky bottle when left stranded – Cool.
But Marty McFly-ing it away from a group who were also struggling to latch back on the the peleton? He went too far and strayed in to taking the piss territory.
He’s got nobody to blame but himself, this was a move that was too stupid to go unpunished.
I expected it to be blatant
I expected it to be blatant after I had it described to me, but that was something else…
To be fair there was far too
To be fair there was far too much sticky bottle a go going at the Giro, I guess they have to draw a line somewhere (just a shame it’s at the back) would have been better if this punishment were dolled out for a breakaway rider at the front getting a bit of a push uphill for something.
To be fair there was far too
To be fair there was far too much sticky bottle a go going at the Giro, I guess they have to draw a line somewhere (just a shame it’s at the back) would have been better if this punishment were dolled out for a breakaway rider at the front getting a bit of a push uphill for something.
Surely if he wanted off the
Surely if he wanted off the race he would have just stayed on the deck after the crash?
Clearly the support vehicle
Clearly the support vehicle was having some engine trouble and Nibali was pulling it out of the other riders path.
Toxmarz wrote:Clearly the
Now THAT is funny, thank you!
Reading the comments leads one to the conclusion that some feel Nibali’s exclusion is “unfair” as “they all do it”. Wasn’t that the excuse so many dopers used in the past to justify their cheating?
Cheating is cheating, both Nibali and Astana (The guys in the team car would know what was happening was illegal) broke the 11th commandment “thou shalt not get found out” the fact is the “dopers” excuse is no excuse at all.
Not just the fastest way to
Not just the fastest way to cover 200 metres on a bike, but the fastest way to get the next three weeks off. Don’t expect to see Nibali riding for Astana next season.
There was no subtlety in his
There was no subtlety in his actions and he really was taking the proverbial. The odd sticky bidon is one thing but that was out and out cheating.
The team’s statement put the blame squarely on the televised images rather than accepting blame, I see.
harragan wrote:There was no
That’s why they employ PR people!
harragan wrote:There was no
Hmm. I took it to be more “not only did we cheat, but we did it in a way that makes the sport a laughing-stock, and we’re sorry for both”.
I’ll be more annoyed if he
I’ll be more annoyed if he nicked a KOM on that stretch of road
serious questions – What are
serious questions – What are your thoughts on breakaway riders who get punctures and then get towed back into the breakaway by either the team cars or race commissaire?
Scoob_84 wrote:serious
At least they usually have to turn the pedals
Scoob_84 wrote:serious
generally in those circumstances the cars are going at the same speed and the commissaires are quick to say get out the way …
Remember how I think it was Peraud who hung onto a medical car for a long time after a crash int he TDF. Some are obvious. After seeing the footage of Nibali this morning, that was way beyond the norm.
I share the vast majority of
I share the vast majority of the options here, but I do enjoy the few of you with no sense of degree.
Had he been alone and untelevised the penalty would’ve been far less strict (or even withheld altogether). The way he dropped 20 guys by holding on to a car is just not an acceptable way to race, and the fact that the footage was so clear made it incontrovertible. Every one of those guys was racing to get back to the peloton. Whatever the circumstances, to drop them like that was dangerous, anti-competitive and wholly unfair. Furthermore, it simply allows for no pretense that that televised race footage could possibly be described as “bike racing”. As Astana themselves have laudably admitted, it tarnishes the image of cycling as competitive sport. He was rightly kicked off.
After Sunday Team ‘cross
After Sunday Team ‘cross race, maybe Nibs thought that Unipublic should be injecting (sorry..) a bit of Bordeaux -Paris into the race. Brmm, brmm… =))
Nibali thinks he is above the
Nibali thinks he is above the racing rules he is not known the shark for no reason.
frazered wrote:Nibali thinks
Nope – it’s from his hometown and he because he is “always on the attack…”
ps – When did Nibali become the “bad guy?” He’s generally thought of as “clean” – Sky almost signed him – and on his day is one of the most exciting riders in the peloton.
JohnnyRemo wrote:ps – When
I can’t speak for anyone else but my reason is because he signed for, and stayed at, Astana. I’d love to believe him as clean and I like him as a rider but you when you lie down with dogs, and particularly ones as filthy as Astana’s, you are going to get fleas.
It’s a leap of faith to believe him to be clean, it’s a ropeless bungee jump of faith to believe that he has no knowledge of other people doping when so many of the team he rides for, along with their development/youth team are getting popped all over the place.
Twat
Twat
So glad “our guys” are beyond
So glad “our guys” are beyond that sort of cheating…
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/racing/giro-ditalia/froome-disqualified-from-giro-ditalia-60517
JohnnyRemo wrote:So glad “our
Given that happened 5 years ago and hasn’t happened since, it appears they are.
JohnnyRemo wrote:So glad “our
I’m glad that they at least have some consistency in the application of the rules, but it doesn’t appear that Froome was trying to seek an advantage from his position, as opposed to Nibali’s antics, if you are drawing comparison.
I’m no Sky fan boy.
By being so blatant he/Astana
By being so blatant he/Astana put the commissaires in a position where they had no choice but to apply a pretty substantial penalty. Whether a DQ is too much is another thing, but I don’t think he can complain.
Also the defence that it was only for 100-150m so no real advantage is pretty laughable given the video.