- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
37 comments
If it was a typical day, around 5 people were killed on the roads that day.
IIRC, obesity-related diseases are behind 30,000 deaths each year, so that's around 82 people on the same day.
So let's rant and rave about cyclists on pavements shall we? Utterly, utterly missing the point about the real problems creating harm to people in the UK by focussing on this one isolated incident...
Be interesting to hear how many people were hit by cars that same day, and how many escaped with just a few bruises. But it's not about that, it's about inflaming hatred and vilifying a minority that has no chance to fight back.
That cyclist needs educating and fining for his selfish stupidity, mind.
I am frequently put in real danger and have my life threatened by cyclists.
Well, they always seem to open with "I'm a cyclist too, but..." to excuse themselves nearly killing someone with a car don't they?
I'm sure the programme makers won't be hoping any such thing. Every such radio or telly programme slot (Loose Women included) rapidly descends into a rabid mob calling for all sorts of sanctions against people on bikes and does nothing to make cycling on roads any safer.
All the usual tired old tropes and knee-jerk prejudices will be aired and anyone with a dissenting viewpoint such as Chris Boardman will have their views lost beneath a chorus of road tax nonsense as well as accusations of red light jumping, pavement cycling and general misbehaviour, regardless of the real danger posed to all vulnerable road users by motor vehicles.
It's ironic that the other main topic on this morning's Radio 4 news and magazine output has been endless debate on childhood obesity and its causes.
Amazing how the Daily Mail waited until after Chris Boardman's strict liability announcement, and then lied about and vilified the cyclist by claiming he "fled" the scene in a "callous" manner and that it was a "hit and run" - when in fact the cyclist stayed... a DM media master class in spin ...
One incident where a child was injured by a cyclist riding where he shouldn't and it attracts national attention. That's because such things are very rare and even when they happen, result in only minor injuries.
Where are the Radio Four discussions on "Can you walk on the pavement in your road without avoiding cars parked where they shouldn't be?" or "Would you let your children walk to school alone?" or "Have you ever felt physically sick walking past a queue of idling buses and taxis?"
What about discussing the real issues, like this?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-30003531
Picked up the Metro today. There were 10 "letters" in a similar article. All from one viewpoint.
Pages