- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
14 comments
My old karate teacher, a former Israeli soldier and also former captain of the British karate team, said something that has stayed with me over many years. He said the good thing about practicing martial arts is that they make you aware enough to know when a confrontational situation is arising so you can in most instances, avoid it. If people go looking for trouble, they are sure to find it. There are very, very few instances in real life when it proves necessary to defend oneself against an aggressor. Responding to aggressive behaviour with yet more aggressive behaviour is part of the problem, not the solution in all but a teeny, tiny minority of instances in western society.
All you armchair heroes.
Road.cc is a forum devoted to cycling accidents.
The cyclist in this incident is lucky he wasn't killed. look up single punch deaths. Fighting is for idiots.
Walk away.
Seriously it isn't worth it. Even if you are 'good' at violence it is likely to lead to a bad outcome one way or the other.
To be fair, I'd say those unfortunate enough to be terminated from a single punch are seriously unlucky rather than the other way around.
My rule when it comes to altercations is that if the aggressor gets out of the car and does anything other than immediately try and hit you, then the reality is that they are not going to hit you...
If the door starts opening.....
http://i.imgur.com/FOvA5sj.gif
To be fair, I'd say those unfortunate enough to be terminated from a single punch are seriously unlucky rather than the other way around.
My rule when it comes to altercations is that if the aggressor gets out of the car and does anything other than immediately try and hit you, then the reality is that they are not going to hit you...
Just your typical Mercedes driver.
I was punched in the head by a driver in Manchester a few months ago, because he cut me up and I remonstrated with him.
The police found him, because my wife had the reg. They interviewd him and he admitted hitting me.
Then they did nothing because it was a first offence, so the rule is..
if in Manchester you can drive badly, put people in dnager and then punch someone once and get away with it.
The lesson is never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
You try fighting in these f'in shoes its hard enough to stand up!
Hold on guys, a cyclist is assaulted by a driver, but it's necessary to mention the ONE event in which a person on a bike hits a driver, even though it took place 18 months ago?
Yes I thought road.cc was better than this!
Maybe they're attempting to paint a picture of Oxford as a veritable cycling warzone.
I get a bit tired of the driver punches cyclist story though. If a driver stops and is out of their car after a verbal altercation then it's a fair assumption (reasonable person test) that they might be intent on violence. They can do verbal from inside the car so getting out indicates that an argumant or verbal exchange is not what they want. It's different if they are still in the car mind. But out and fronting you means they are fair game if they show any sign at all of aggression. So whacking a road rager that's out of their vehicle looking for aggro is self defence pure and simple.
" I saw the driver get out of their vehicle and walk aggressively and purposefully towards me. It was clear to me that they intended to be violent. I could not see what they had in their hand as they kept that behind them and hidden from me. I feared that I might be assaulted with some kind of weapon and hurt. In self defence I....."
It appears to be some unfathomable urge on road.cc's part to shoehorn 'balance' into a story where it doesn't belong.
If that's the case, can we look forward to the next hit and run report featuring a dead cyclist in a ditch to also mention the last instance of an uncaring cyclist using his bike to wipe out a motorist?