A van driver who laughed as he deliberately drove at a group of cyclists has been jailed for six months.
According to a report from the Daily Post, Joel Reece Morris drove his white Transit van on the wrong side of the road at the 20-rider group “for fun”, swerving back to his side of the road moments before a collision.
Many of the riders fell off their bikes as the group stopped, believing they were going to be hit.
Morris, 25, of Connah’s Quay, Flintshire, North Wales was jailed for six months. He was also banned from driving for six months and will have to take an extended driving test before being allowed to drive again.
The incident happened at 10.45am on Sunday November 17, 2013. The cyclists from Ellesmere Port were riding two abreast along the B5125 at Northop Hall, Flintshire.
Witnesses described Morris laughing as he drove at the group.
Afterwards he stopped and as riders approached him to get his registration number he reversed with his tyres screeching as his passenger gave them a V sign.
Morris had previously claimed he had swerved to avoid something in the road, and had not deliberately driven at the riders, but at Mold Crown Court on Wednesday he accepted the prosecution case in full.
David Mainstone, prosecuting, said that a female cyclist at the head of the group swerved to the left and told how she would have been hit if she had fallen to the right.
Morris had two previous convictions for drink driving and leaving the scene of an accident.
Jayne La Grua, mitigating, said Morris appreciated the seriousness of what he had done. He had sought the help of a driving instructor with his impulsive actions behind the wheel.
He was a cockler and the loss of his driving licence meant the loss of his job. “This was a phenomenally stupid and dangerous thing to do,” she said.
Judge Niclas Parry told Morris: “This was an inexplicable piece of dangerous driving. For some reason, known only to you, you decided to goad and, more seriously, intimidate a group of cyclists doing no more than what has become a very common, enjoyable and worthwhile past time of riding in a group on a Sunday morning.
“For fun, you deliberately drove at them to alarm them and to make them lose control. You drove intentionally at that group.”
Only the alertness of the cyclists prevented any major injuries, said the judge. The evasive action riders were forced to take resulted in some of them colliding with each other, with some falling off and sustaining minor injuries and damage to their bikes.
The judge mentioned recent incidents in which cyclists had been seriously injured or killed and said: “There is a duty on every motorist to respect the safety of cyclists.”
Follow-up: Ride leader Terry Hughes has given a detailed account of what happened.

69 thoughts on “Van driver who laughed as he drove at cyclists jailed for six months”
(No subject)
=D>
Would not be surprised if
Would not be surprised if this guy will be back in the news after his ban, with a tragic outcome. So he will have to pass an extensive driving test again? Does that include a test to see whether he is actually mentally fit to drive a car? Probably not. Should get forced to ride a bike daily on a busy road for the couple of months or weeks that he will actually be in jail. Maybe that would get him the maturity that he has been lacking up to now.
Chapeaux for the Jail term
Chapeaux for the Jail term but a 6 month ban? his drink driving and leaving scenes of accidents were justification of banning him for life, yet alone this inciddent
Finally, a sentence that
Finally, a sentence that isn’t suspended! Realistically, he’ll serve 3 months, and as the ban will run concurrently (believe this is correct?), will only be banned for a further 3 after that. However, not only has he lost his job, he’ll probably lose his home in that 6 months unless he’s still at his parents, and his car insurance will go through the roof. I wouldn’t expect him to be insured to drive any employers’ vehicles again. He’s ruined his future, and for what? What a tool.
Good also that m’lud acknowledged “cyclists doing no more than what has become a very common, enjoyable and worthwhile past time of riding in a group on a Sunday morning”
Finally, a sentence that
Finally, a sentence that isn’t suspended! Realistically, he’ll serve 3 months, and as the ban will run concurrently (believe this is correct?), will only be banned for a further 3 after that. However, not only has he lost his job, he’ll probably lose his home in that 6 months unless he’s still at his parents, and his car insurance will go through the roof. I wouldn’t expect him to be insured to drive any employers’ vehicles again. He’s ruined his future, and for what? What a tool.
Good also that m’lud acknowledged “cyclists doing no more than what has become a very common, enjoyable and worthwhile past time of riding in a group on a Sunday morning”
So he will be banned from
So he will be banned from driving during the six months he is in prison? That’s going to hit hard then….
JeevesBath wrote:So he will
Did I not read somewhere (quite possibly on here) that that used to be how it worked (idiotic though it is) but common-sense finally kicked in and now it starts after release? Maybe I imagined that?
JeevesBath wrote:So he will
Hopefully not but, either way, just six months off the road for this incident as well as other serious offences? Pathetic, and falls far short of being effective.
As for his laughhable claim of “seeking help” I’d suggest that he needs a psychiatrist, not a driving instructor (some of whom don’t even know how to drive properly around cyclists themselves).
double post. oops.
double post. oops.
JeevesBath wrote:So he will
No. It will be six months after he leaves prison. Not sure why he should get a licence back at all. But 6 months after he will have to take an extended driving test. If he passes he gets back an endorsed licence. I don’t think he will enjoy the discussion with the insurance company either.
Not long enough in my opinion but don’t underestimate the impact of even 6 months in prison and the massive extra costs of driving again. Oh and plod will have an ANPR interest marker for previous DQ against any vehicle he owns or insures. So he had better drive nicely and make sure he doesn’t fall foul of them for any minor things. He can look forward to regular document checks, vehicle inspections and will get to be an expert on breathalysers. Oh and with this as previous any more reports from cyclists about his behaviour and he’ll get the book thrown at him and really hard (and I hope it hurts).
oozaveared wrote:JeevesBath
It’s entirely possible the local cops will take a strong interest in this bloke. If they need to keep up their arrest records, he’ll be an easy mark if his record is anything to go by. I do wonder whether he’ll learn lessons from this, since trends with regard to offenders and modes of behaviour suggests he won’t.
Publishing his name isn’t a great idea. The local cops will have him in their sights. Keeping him off the road will be of benefit for car drivers, motorcyclists and pedestrians, not just cyclists.
Sounds like a decent Judge
Sounds like a decent Judge for a change, well done m’lud.
As for the driver, what an absolute endbell, going to prison with all the associated problems for his future and for what ? Seriously hope he continues to suffer for a long time, someone could have been killed
A k**b head driver actually
A k**b head driver actually going to see the inside of a prison cell for a change. More of this is needed to act as a deterrent.
You’re assuming he be a good boy in future and try to get insurance, analysis would suggest he’s probably the sort of brainless moron that wouldn’t bother with it.
Let’s hope he isn’t raped
Let’s hope he isn’t raped morning noon and night every single day he’s inside, hey?
allez neg wrote:Let’s hope he
This is a country that hates cyclists, so he’ll be given hi-5s and his choice of pretty boys.
Good! More of this please.
Good! More of this please.
“He was a cockler and the
“He was a cockler and the loss of his driving licence meant the loss of his job”
so now he’s just a cock then …
6 months driving ban for dangerous driving – really he should be banned for 6 years – this wasn’t inattention, this was a deliberate act of intimidation which could’ve led to the death of the cyclists.
I’d bet it wasn’t the first time he’s done it either.
sorry, I am confused, driving
sorry, I am confused, driving at a group and swerving at the last minute, gets you a 6month sentence, but driving over the top of a cyclist gets you a suspended 6 month sentence.
….
er
….
Sorry, is this saying that if you intend to punish cyclists, you should kill them????????????????????
does his driving ban start on
does his driving ban start on the day of release? If not then it’s a joke…
to be fair, its more than
to be fair, its more than drivers have got that have killed cyclist
its not right, but better than some cases recently
clearly thought Top Gear is a
clearly thought Top Gear is a documentary series on advanced driving techniques.
6 month ban…. While he’s in
6 month ban…. While he’s in prison and can’t drive anyway. Well done.
Something similar happened to
Something similar happened to me on last Sunday’s 56miler. I was less than a mile from home, descending a road in which I can reach speed of 30+, has multiple parked cars but is wide enough for two way traffic. On this day, I was going slower as I’d had an issue with my rear brake earlier in the ride and as a precaution decided that slower was better just in case I had to brake suddenly. (I am, after all, a defensive rider/driver.) And what happens, a young woman who was ascending the hill in her car, looks straight at me and I’m looking at her, and she suddenly crosses the white line without any indication of her action, in order to park on the opposite side of the road! She clearly can see and judge my speed and you can bet, if I had been a car, she wouldn’t have made that maneuver. Of course, I think she’s coming straight at me, I have to slam me anchors down (thank goodness my on the go brake adjustment I performed earlier worked) my rear wheel slides out and up (I’m so glad I wasn’t going normal 30mph here). I’m screaming all kinds of choice curse words that I can think of and I seriously contemplate fully unclipping and walking a ways up the hill to her car so I can ask her, “What the “f*ck?” But, I’m very rightly angry and experiencing some severe back spasms so decide to go home. When I arrived, my poor patient husband got an earful of what happened. I seriously considered changing my shoes and jumping in my car to go see if the motorist was still parked up, but I’m the one who probably would get in trouble with the police as I have no evidence.
The road.cc story is a positive result and gives me hope that there is still some justice left in the world. The last remark by the judge, for me, was spot on: “There is a duty on every motorist to respect the safety of cyclists.”
pepita wrote: And what
I’d bet she’s some kind of sociopath, as is the van driver in the article.
You didn’t register as a person with her.
Just my pop psych opinion.
A minor victory for bike
=D> A minor victory for bike riders and common sense
A minor victory for bike
=D> A minor victory for bike riders and common sense
Six month’s *might* have been
Six month’s *might* have been fair. But with previous convictions?
It’s ludicrous to suppose this man could ever be safe. When he kills, the judge who let him drive again should be held liable.
Finally a sentence that is
Finally a sentence that is appropriate. However, that puts a very different light at other sentences that had human death involved and got suspended. Also, after a driving record like that, there should be no way back behind a steering wheel of any sort of motorized transport, period!
Overall, finally, a step into the right direction!
Six months off the road?
Six months off the road? What a joke. Does anyone feel safe with this guy on the road? What do you have to do to get a lifetime driving ban?
All driving bans start on
All driving bans start on release from custody. Dangerous driving is supposed to be a minimum 12 month ban so not sure how he got away with 6. Still a result that he got jail time.
If he’d have said he was blinded by the sun and mown the lot of them down he’d probably be at home now
I wonder how long he will be
I wonder how long he will be out before he gets a conviction for driving without insurance/whilst disqualified… based on his history of ignoring road rules he should never be allowed to drive again. But thankfully a Judge has seen fit to punsh for the crime. Hopefully this is the start of something
Quote:Sorry, is this saying
Well, there’d be no witnesses if he did, so his story of having to swerve to avoid something couldn’t be argued against…so yes, basically!
The eejit should have got 6
The eejit should have got 6 years NOT 6 months. The sentence is a joke. If he’d hit and killed several cyclists would he have have got life as it would have been murder? Dream on, of course he wouldn’t.
If you want to kill some one in this country you’ll only get a slap on the wrists / get off, if you do it in a car, van, lorry, etc.
Another mentalist in charge
Another mentalist in charge of a vehicle.
Let’s hope that he doesn’t
Let’s hope that he doesn’t try and learn how to brush his teeth with a shotgun 😉 Arsehole!
Oh, I don’t know, let’s hope
Oh, I don’t know, let’s hope he does, then he can blow his brain cell out…
It’s a sad comment on the
It’s a sad comment on the judicial system that people who have multiple convictions for serious driving offences are ever allowed to drive again.
Need to drive for your job? Don’t commit serious offences.
It *should* be that simple
Two previous and he’s still
Two previous and he’s still being given the chance to re-do his license…..
#facepalm.
I am of the opinion that this
I am of the opinion that this was a violent hate crime. Being racist or homophobic in public these days can easily land you in the dock so all the bigots who were previously into gay bashing have had to go looking for another minority to persecute. Again the CPS have used the wrong charge. Violent disorder should have been what he was charged with and it should also be what he was convicted of, in future he can tell employers that he was found guilty of a driving offence which sounds a hell of a lot better than telling the truth, which is that he had a good go at putting a large group of people in fear of their life simply because he thinks they are different from him. If these incidents continue we are going to see the first case of a driver getting dragged out of a car and worked over with a d-lock by a bunch of commuters as the current negative press in right wing media is making idiots think that they can terrorize or even kill cyclists with the peer approval of most of society – people will only live in fear for so long before they start fighting back.
How on earth did he manage to
How on earth did he manage to get insurance with two previous convictions for drink driving?
Tom Amos wrote:How on earth
Because it’s a free country and a free market. Car insurance is a product based on risk and not any perceived ethical judgement. The number of accidents caused by people who have previously been guilty of drink driving is not (surprisingly) any different to that of the wider populace.
Tom Amos wrote:How on earth
[[[[[ It reads like maybe one conviction for drunk-driving, and one for leaving the scene of an accident. But either way, why, after his latest lunacy, is he only banned for a mere six months?
P.R.
Pedant’s corner – the judge
Pedant’s corner – the judge must has said (and intended) pastime, not past time – two entirely different things and we don’t really want cycling to be a past time activity!
Good report though 🙂
Mike McBeth wrote:Pedant’s
Pedant typo, oh the irony
Doubt PC Plod will find the
Doubt PC Plod will find the time to do what Cyclists would love to see !
Anyone who visits http://bikinginla.com/ will be horrified to see 15 Deaths in Sth Cal , USA , already this year !
Time Bozo & UK created a version of :
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Vision-ZERO-Worldwide/540123632761709
Only be daily reminding Poli.s that THEY are responsible , will any effort be put into keeping CYCLISTS safe on the road !
“Morris had two previous
“Morris had two previous convictions for drink driving and leaving the scene of an accident.”
Come on, at what point does someone lose the right do drive for life? Somewhere around here I’d say.
Lessons need to be learned –
http://www.justice4rossandclare.com
Luckily he has an uncommon
Luckily he has an uncommon name and comes from a small town. He’s on my list.
racyrich wrote:Luckily he has
Yep, I’m sure cyclists in the Deeside area will keep an eye out for Joel Reece Morris, 25, of Mold Road, Connah’s Quay.
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/laughing-connahs-quay-van-driver-6729093/north-wales-news/laughing-connahs-quay-van-driver-6729093
Not enough for the Road.CC
Not enough for the Road.CC flog ’em and hang ’em brigade ( whatever could be without the return of the noose) but it sounds as if the judge is actually keen on cycling which is a step forward. 6 months for dangerous driving and a ban is pretty much all that was possible for the offence.
I refer you, as ever, to my footer.
MercuryOne wrote:Not enough
The prison sentence was about right and a welcome change, the ban is odd though. The minimum ban for dangerous driving is 12 month unless there are exceptional circumstances. Someone who has previous driving convictions shouldn’t really be getting a reduction and curious to know what the exceptional circumstances are to warrant it
Six month ban for dangerous
Six month ban for dangerous driving, despite three previous serious offences.
Sigh.
dp24 wrote:Six month ban for
Exactly, the criminal should have had a ten year ban following his second drink driving offence, there are ways of making a living without a driving licence, something the courts don’t seem to acknowledge.
Probably because they involve cycling to work or taking public transport, both of which are probably alien to Jaguar driving judges.
Sounds very similar to what
Sounds very similar to what happened to a local training group here in the 80’s – except the driver didn’t get back onto his own side in time – ploughed into the bunch – killed one clubmate – injured many others.
Driver left the scene of the accident and tried to hide his car, but was caught and prosecuted. Outcome? Driving ban and fine…
We have to start moving away
We have to start moving away from the idea that not having a licence is too awful a sanction for courts to impose, particuarly since growing numbers in society are demonstrating that it is indeed perfectly possible to live a normal life without a car.
Think he should be banned
Think he should be banned from driving for life as his actions were deliberate and therefore can’t be trusted behind the wheel. Glad he is in jail though and lets hope he drops his soap in the shower!
I see this as a good sign. If
I see this as a good sign. If drivers can be given jail time for not actually hitting someone, then we should start seeing a reduction in the number of drivers who put cyclists’ lives at risk. Personally I’ll see at least one driver per hour who I consider to have been lucky to get away without knocking me off the bike.
Until the law is changed and the sentencing guidlines updated, this is probably the best way forward, and it is indeed progress.
I also doubt very much that his license will be delivered to him at the end of his ban.
I also think that jail time, a ban, a huge expense to obtain his license and loss of job is quite a significant punishment. He’ll also be known by local plod (deeside isn’t that big) and won’t be driving illegally for long either.
I also must remember this as I ride through Deeside… :O
“Morris had two previous
“Morris had two previous convictions for drink driving and leaving the scene of an accident.”
I don’t want this bloke driving at all! It has nothing to do with cycling.
He obviously has a mental problem and putting him inside for 6 months will only make it worse. Personally I would have him put down as a waste of space but that probably isn’t possible because all you leftie cyclists would object.
“He was a cockler and the
“He was a cockler and the loss of his driving licence meant the loss of his job.”
Do we give a shit about his job, hope he finds Bubba in the showers in prison. Low life JOEL REECE THOMAS” get his retribution.
“He was a cockler and the
“He was a cockler and the loss of his driving licence meant the loss of his job.”
Do we give a shit about his job, hope he finds Bubba in the showers in prison. Low life JOEL REECE THOMAS” get his retribution.
If this moron had fired a
If this moron had fired a shotgun at a group of cyclists he’d have been banned for life from owning a firearm. In 6 months or so (despite an “extended driving test”) he’ll be back behind the wheel of a potentially lethal vehicle. I hope the “extended test” includes extensive psychological therapy for psychopathic behaviour.
While it is a step forward
While it is a step forward that a driver gets a prison sentence at all, I do wonder why other websites reporting on this have to drag up the same nonsense.
Taken from Daily Post, North Wales main local paper: (http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/laughing-connahs-quay-van-driver-6729093)
“Prosecutor David Mainstone said the incident happened at 10.45am on Sunday November 17 last year when the cyclists from Ellesmere Port were riding two abreast along the B5125 at Northop Hall, Flintshire.”
WTF does riding have 2 abreast have to do with anything here?
It’s almost as if they want to spark a response…
I’m pretty certain the
I’m pretty certain the *prosecutor* mentioned that the club was riding two abreast because it made Morris’s idiocy even more dangerous. If the ride had been in single file, he would have missed them by more and they might not have had to take evasive action.
The justice system is a
The justice system is a f*cking joke. This guy should have got 10 years for attempted murder and for the rest of his grubby driving record and been banned from driving for life. No one ever gets near even 25% of a full tariff of a notional full tariff of 10 years for dangerous driving so what do you have to do to get a pretty long sentence? Kill a whole peloton?
“He was a cockler and the
“He was a cockler and the loss of his driving licence meant the loss of his job.”
This says more about the simple-minded defence counsel than anything. How often do you see the defence: “He’s really sorry your Honour, but he was too p*ssed to know what he was doing.”
If I were a judge, I’d just double the sentence every time I heard that!
I wonder what this poor soul
I wonder what this poor soul will do to get around when he gets out of the nick?
Who will join me in funding the cost of a bike for him?
When that happens, perhaps one of the Cycling Militia (which I keep proposing should be formed) might perhaps (in all innocence of course) have cause to utter those magic words over his prostrate (and hopefully broken) body “Sorry mate, I didn’t see you.”
As happens on an all too regular basis, at best he’ll get a slap on the wrist and a visit to SpecSavers.
Would suggest there were
Would suggest there were arguments for trying under ‘a threat to kill’ rather than just dangerous driving.
Yes it was dangerous driving, but that driving was done to make his victims seriously fear for their lives. Which from my experience on a jury is the definition of a threat to kill.
This carries (or at least used to) a 2 year sentence.
I think the custodial
I think the custodial sentence is about right (I’m generally not an advocate of long prison sentences) – but our judges and magistrates really do need to be given greater powers to hand out LIFETIME bans, with no possibility of legally driving a motor vehicle ever again. Through his unrepentant recidivism, this moron has proved that he should never, ever, be allowed behind the wheel again.
Fact is, never mind what’s gone on here (and people ‘buzzing’ cyclists for fun is something I imagine most people on here will have experienced, it’s far from rare), given his previous convictions he shouldn’t be on the road anyway.
And this is not a ‘cyclists v drivers’ issue; far from it. But the politicians need to get their arses in gear on this, and soon.
If I were to shoot a legally
If I were to shoot a legally owned gun at people for shits and giggles then I would expect to recieve a lengthy custodial sentence and be banned from ever again having a firearms licence. However if I were to hit somebody with this gun I would be far less likely to kill them than if I were to hit them with a 3.5 ton van at a closing delta of 50mph. That there are still people saying that this sentence is appropriate beggars belief.
The judge’s comments are
The judge’s comments are welcome and the jail sentence appropriate, but “banned from driving for six months”! He seems to have an optimistic view of how long it takes some people to grow up and act responsibly enough to be allowed control of a lethal piece of equipment in public. This is someone who has ‘two previous convictions for drink driving and leaving the scene of an accident’. He will come straight out of jail and back into a car. How about 5 years ban to allow some maturing to go on in that head of his?