- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Cross country mountain bikes
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
No real sign of aggression, just a pretty hard stop by the look of things. Disc brakes on the bike, so a good stopping capability, but the wet and spray will have had an effect.
Did the driver get ahead by a reasonable 'stopping distance for a bike' between them before pulling back in ?
Was his braking intentional towards the cyclist ? ie previous aggro
Did the cyclist brake to the best of his abililty ?
Did the bike have adequate brakes - not 1970s chrome rims with hard rubber blocks ?
They would go for 100 yards before drying out enough to begin to stop.
'Raleigh Raincheck' built a leather 'squeegee' strip into the blocks.
http://player.bfi.org.uk/film/watch-raleigh-raincheck-advert-1976/
£1 ! Not likely.
A point of clarification - who's liable for the dent?