Schwalbe Marathon – personal review

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #21049
    pakennedy

    A while back I asked for recommendations for replacement tyres. I went with the suggestions and a Schwalbe Marathon 700 x 38c arrived free delivery courtesy of Wiggle.

    First observation. Wiggle sent it as is. I was expecting it to be folded somehow, but no. I got an enormouse package.

    Second observation it is bigger than the Raleigh tyres I had on the bike. This was noticeable twice. The first time was putting a little air in the tube to slot it into the tyre prior to installing it. The tube wasn’t as big as the tyre so didn’t tuck in all the way round.

    Fitting it on the wheel was fun too. As it is puncture resistant it is also quite stiff and didn’t want to engage on the rim but that was the case with the previous tyre too. One slight difference is that once it started to go into place, I was able to get the last couple of inches on by hand instead of needing levers like the Raleigh tyre did.

    Then I put the wheel back on the bike. Did I mention the tyre is bigger? The wheel wouldn’t go all the way on. It jammed pretty much all the way around the mudguard. 2 locking bolts off the front and everything else adjusted to the maximum was needed to get clearance. It was also clipping the brakes so they got adjusted too.

    Use: The tyre has a bit more volume and seems softer so a little more pumping was required to get it to 50psi. The rubber is certainly softer and grippier. I have more confidence cornering and it is less likely to lock if I brake hard.

    Oddly, in spite of the softer rubber and a touch more tread pattern it seems to have less grip in mud (I do a lot of miles on canal paths) and I get more wheel spins in low gears in the wet bits.

    As advertised I haven’t had a puncture in 400+ miles. My unprotected mountain bike can’t go 5 miles on the canal path without getting a hawthorn in it. Its record is 25 punctures in 10 miles (just after British Waterways had been along with the hedge cutting barge). 2 replacement tubes and any number of patches used up that day.

    I’m not a quick cyclist and my main bike is a Raleigh Urban 2; just a town bike really that’s quite well built and comfortable. It eats up the miles with little effort. I was quite surprised the other day when i went out on a geocaching expedition with lots of stops, going across muddy fields, lifting the bike over stiles and ended up doing 34 miles when I thought I’d done maybe 15. I see these beautiful road bikes on here and find myself wondering how I would ruin them with a rack and panniers large enough for a week’s shopping.

    I am pretty proud that I ride enough that I’ve ditched the car entirely andthe only wheels in my house come in pairs powered by legs.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #783411
    notfastenough

    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    if

    [quote=morethansonglyrics]
    if I wanted to hear a review of a budget tyre, I could have found one on any old bike shop website.
    [quote]

    If you didn’t want to hear a review of a budget tyre, why did you click the thread titled “Schwalbe Marathon – personal review”? Rather obvious, no? Or you just trolling?

    #783409
    notfastenough

    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    if

    [quote=morethansonglyrics]
    if I wanted to hear a review of a budget tyre, I could have found one on any old bike shop website.
    quote]

    If you didn’t want to hear a review of a budget tyre, why did you click the thread titled “Schwalbe Marathon – personal review”? Rather obvious, no? Or you just trolling?

    #783407
    mooleur

    step-hent wrote:Wondering

    step-hent wrote:
    Wondering what on earth happened to road.cc after reading the comments section here. It used to be a friendly community, none of the stupid sniping on lots of cycling forums, no point scoring in the comments, just a constructive bunch who were interested in the topic. Now, more often than not, the comments sections seem doomed to descend into the usual forum tripe which no-one would ever consider acceptable in a face-to-face conversation. Can we go back to the enjoyable road.cc please?

    Hear hear! It’s getting a bit much.

    Anyhoo, @pakennedy – thanks for the review! Always enjoy a good ‘real world’ review – not enough folks take the time to write ’em these days! 🙂

    #783405
    Chuck

    Why so harsh? You seem to be
    Why so harsh? You seem to be going out of your way to have a go here.

    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    pakennedy wrote:
    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    tl;dr: yawn

    I’m sorry I don’t ride a carbon speed machine and can’t get close to Strava segments. (Although I’m a few seconds off on one). I cycle in a world where a budget tyre is a significant purchase. I can barely afford food so.. f*** off

    “the only wheels in my house come in pairs powered by legs”
    you are a hoot mate. next you’ll be telling us cycling is your religion – get over yourself. if I wanted to hear a review of a budget tyre, I could have found one on any old bike shop website.

    “can’t get close to Strava segments. (Although I’m a few seconds off on one)” you are comical.

    #783403
    Jack Osbourne snr

    step-hent wrote:Wondering

    step-hent wrote:
    Wondering what on earth happened to road.cc after reading the comments section here. It used to be a friendly community, none of the stupid sniping on lots of cycling forums, no point scoring in the comments, just a constructive bunch who were interested in the topic. Now, more often than not, the comments sections seem doomed to descend into the usual forum tripe which no-one would ever consider acceptable in a face-to-face conversation. Can we go back to the enjoyable road.cc please?

    Indeed.

    People not interested in a topic or thread need only stop reading it or indeed not read it at all.

    Positive criticism should never be discouraged, but comments such as “yawn” are unnecessary.

    Mind you, so is suggesting that someone is at twat… Whoops..oh well, too late now.

    #783401
    Jack Osbourne snr

    morethansonglyrics wrote:This

    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    This website truly is the Daily Mail of cycling. Such mock outrage.

    I had a scan through some of your other posts and found them to be a mixture of dull, unnecessary, and occasionally completely inappropriate. Of the forty-odd I reckon less than a dozen were worth reading.

    For the benefit of our Daily Mail reading membership I’m going to summarise this into a short review of your contribution to and behaviour on this website, thus:

    .

    [size=6](In order to avoid mock outrage, the word “Twat” has been removed from the above review)[/size]

    #783399
    step-hent

    Wondering what on earth
    Wondering what on earth happened to road.cc after reading the comments section here. It used to be a friendly community, none of the stupid sniping on lots of cycling forums, no point scoring in the comments, just a constructive bunch who were interested in the topic. Now, more often than not, the comments sections seem doomed to descend into the usual forum tripe which no-one would ever consider acceptable in a face-to-face conversation. Can we go back to the enjoyable road.cc please?

    #783397
    PJ McNally

    Nick T wrote:To be fair to

    Nick T wrote:
    To be fair to Wiggle, any company posting wire bead tyres will send them in the round – I’d be upset if my brand new tyres were twisted into smaller loops or even folded so they could save a few bob on postage.

    Kevlar beads are foldable and are packaged by the manufacturer like this, look in any lbs and you’ll see the racks of wire beads hanging the like an Essex girls stirrup earrings.

    Not true – I have ordered wire bead tires online, only to receive a smaller package, with them folded up (figure of eight, squashed flat, then zip tie holding things together). Don’t think it was wiggle, but other online bike shops definitely do this.

    Once i had the bead then snap, and stab its way out of the tire, only a month or two after fitting. Not impressed! I wish they would not try to fold non folding tires.

    #783395
    pakennedy

    LBS doesn’t do scwalbe and
    LBS doesn’t do scwalbe and the cheapest offreing was £40. Not sure what make it was.

    #783393
    harman_mogul

    Dull, too!
    Dull, too!

    #783391
    giff77

    Good on ya PA. Great down to
    Good on ya PA. Great down to earth review.

    #783389
    morethansonglyrics

    This website truly is the
    This website truly is the Daily Mail of cycling. Such mock outrage.

    #783387
    morethansonglyrics

    Deriding the OP? I must be
    Deriding the OP? I must be mistaken, but I believe it was he who told me to “f off”.

    #783385
    Simon E

    If this review is so
    If this review is so unappealling to you then why bother commenting twice just to deride the OP?

    Instead of cheap shots at someone who has made an effort why not post something constructive? Or start your own thread.

    #783383
    morethansonglyrics

    pakennedy

    pakennedy wrote:
    morethansonglyrics wrote:
    tl;dr: yawn

    I’m sorry I don’t ride a carbon speed machine and can’t get close to Strava segments. (Although I’m a few seconds off on one). I cycle in a world where a budget tyre is a significant purchase. I can barely afford food so.. f*** off

    “the only wheels in my house come in pairs powered by legs”
    you are a hoot mate. next you’ll be telling us cycling is your religion – get over yourself. if I wanted to hear a review of a budget tyre, I could have found one on any old bike shop website.

    “can’t get close to Strava segments. (Although I’m a few seconds off on one)” you are comical.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.