Look has launched its new Keo Vision clipless pedals with built-in lights that, it says, are visible from up to 1km away, day or night.
“This innovative pedal range, featuring integrated lighting technology, is designed to maximise visibility, confidence, and lightweight functionality, transforming cycling safety and style,” says Look.
Sounds pretty good, huh? But do they comply with UK legal requirements for riding at night?

The use of bike lights and reflectors is regulated under the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989 and subsequent amendments. Government guidance says:
Any cycle which is used between sunset and sunrise must be fitted with the following:
– white front light
– red rear light
– red rear reflector
– amber/yellow pedal reflectors – front and rear on each pedal
Here’s what the Highway Code says:

Pedal reflectors front and rear, unless your bike is at least 40 years old? In reality, few of us who use clipless systems have reflectors on our pedals.

Maybe you do. They certainly exist. Look offers its Geo Trekking Grip pedals, for example, which have an SPD-compatible mechanism on one side. Shimano offers a similar proposition with its PD-T8000 – a flat platform on one side, an SPD mechanism on the other. There are other examples out there, along with reflector units that can be added to SPD pedals.
> Everything you need to know about bike pedals
What about road-specific bike pedals, though? Your bike might well have come with some cheapo moulded plastic pedals with amber reflectors on both sides, but you never fitted them, did you? You lobbed them away with the spoke protector or threw them into a dusty corner of the garage, never to be seen again.

If you use single-sided road pedals from any of the major brands, they won’t have come with reflectors fitted. Reflectors aren’t mandatory for daylight riding but, as we saw above, the rules say that you must have them when riding at night. Your bike might be lit up like a Christmas tree, you might be wearing a fully reflective jacket and have 3M Scotchlite panels on your shoes, but if you don’t have pedal reflectors front and rear, you’re not complying with the law.
People were bickering chatting about it on the road.cc forum way back in 2012.

Look’s Keo Vision pedals are built specifically “for day and night visibility”.
“The unique system of lights integrated into the pedal, highlighting the rider’s biomotion, increases visibility by 5.5 times compared with a standard light mounted on a seatpost,” says Look.
“With dual moving red lights, riders benefit from enhanced visibility, and drivers perceive speed and distance more accurately. Offering 180° visibility and four versatile light modes—including both continuous and flashing patterns—these lights are engineered to adapt to any riding condition, guaranteeing optimal safety in all environments.”
Do they come with amber/yellow reflectors front and rear? Nope. Is this a problem? I spoke to a recently retired police officer of 30 years, much of that time in the traffic division.
> Read our review of Redshift’s Arclight Bike Pedals, complete with front and rear lights
He didn’t want to be named but confirmed what you’d probably expect: police aren’t going to pull you over for not having reflectors on your pedals when you’re riding at night; they’ve got more important things to worry about. But what if something bad happens?
“These things are all well and good until something goes wrong. The most obvious example is if a cyclist is killed or seriously injured, and it’s dusk or night, the vehicle examiner examines the bike, and there are no reflectors on the pedals.
“Regardless of whether the lights were on and functioning, a percentage of blame could be attached to the cyclist, potentially. And then it would be between insurance companies or lawyers to work out what the percentage blame was.
“It looks good and it sounds like a great idea, but you have to comply with the law. These things are in place for a reason. Those lights are probably better than an amber reflector, but what if the battery goes? The whole point of reflectors is that they’re a backup safety measure.”
Okay, but isn’t the word “potentially” doing some heavy lifting there? Does that ever happen in reality? Is blame or the size of an insurance payout ever affected by something as seemingly trivial as a cyclist not having reflectors on their pedals when riding at night?
We asked personal injury lawyer Mark Hambleton, a partner at RWK Goodman down the road from us in Bath.
Mark said, “In my experience of civil claims for compensation on behalf of injured cyclists, I have never seen a motor insurer run an argument to the effect that pedal reflectors should have been present. Thinking about it, my pedals on my commuter bike don’t have reflectors on them.
“I don’t expect insurers take the point because it would be very unlikely that they could argue that an accident would have been avoided had the pedals been fitted with reflective strips. I just don’t think that would ever be a causative factor or make the difference between an accident happening and being avoided.
“I don’t think riding a bike without reflectors on the pedals is evidence of contributory negligence either. That is the sort of argument generally reserved for riding a bike at night without illuminated lights.
“I have never seen the police concern themselves with the presence of pedal reflectors during criminal investigations. I can see it might play a part if a rider was riding at night with no lights, bike reflectors or high vis clothing.”
Isn’t it a bit strange that we have obligations set out in law and written down clearly in the Highway Code, but if you don’t follow them, no one’s going to get too bent out of shape about it? What’s the use of that?
I spoke to Dan Joyce, who’s editor of Cycle, Cycling UK’s magazine.
“You’re required to have amber pedal reflectors when riding between dusk and dawn in the UK. However, the amber pedal reflector rule is not policed and makes a scofflaw of anyone using most clipless pedals, unless they’ve fitted adaptors with reflectors (which only some pedals will accept).
“The majority of UK cyclists who do have amber pedal reflectors are probably not road legal at night in any case, as their lights won’t meet BS6102/3 or an equivalent EC standard, which is what the regulations require. You can find lights that meet ‘an equivalent EC standard’: Germany’s StVZO, which a minority of bike lights available in the UK do meet. As for finding lights that meet BS6102/3, good luck with that.

“Having said all that, the up-down motion of pedal reflectors is useful for immediately identifying a cyclist as a cyclist. Reflective ankle bands do a similar job, even though (like most lighting and reflectivity used by most UK cyclists) they don’t meet the lighting regulations. Look’s pedal lights will also have an up-down motion that will suggest ‘cyclist’.
“The Look pedals can be set to flash. Red flashing rear lights are associated with cyclists because cyclists are the only non-emergency road users who can legally use flashing lights – either in conjunction with an approved rear light or, if the flashing lights can only flash (no steady mode) and do so at 1-4 times per second, as your only rear light(s).”
Isn’t this all a bit of a mess? Even if you’re trying to do the right thing – making yourself as visible as possible on the road to minimise the chances of anything nasty happening, benefiting both yourself and other road users – you might well find yourself outside of cycle lighting regulations. Is that an issue? Probably not, but where’s the line? Most of us aren’t experts in law and/or insurance, and aren’t qualified to make that judgment; we shouldn’t need to.
The Look Keo Vision pedals are designed to enhance rider visibility beyond what simple reflectors provide, thanks to their integrated LED lighting system. From a safety standpoint, the product exceeds the intent of the regulation, even if it doesn’t match its literal wording.
The law and the products cyclists actually use to stay visible aren’t quite in sync—and until they are, we’re left navigating a gap between safety and legality. In short, it’s time for the law to catch up.

























31 thoughts on “When cycling safety tech collides with the law: Look’s new luminous pedals highlight that the Highway Code is still in dire need of an overhaul”
Dan Joyce wrote:
As far as I can see, each can legally use flashing lights
GMBasix wrote:
As far as I can see, each can legally use flashing lights— Dan Joyce
Also, flashing amber lights on slow-moving vehicles.
Also also, indicators.
So, er, yes – that’s pretty much everybody…
But only cycles have flashing
But only cycles have flashing RED ones?
I love my bike wrote:
No, horse riders can and do use flashing rear-facing red lights just as cyclists do. Also, since last year, breakdown vehicles are allowed to use flashing red lights in certain circumstances as well.
I love my bike wrote:
As pointed out by others, including the post I quoted, no.
Also, not the original claim, so not really relevant. ?♂️
Quote:
While shimano’s clipless pedals don’t usually come with reflectors, there is almost always compatible reflectors sold separately that conform to the BS 6102-2.
For example I used to rock the sm-pd62’s with my single sided pd-es600 spd’s during winter rides. And there’s the sm-pd65 or sm-pd63 for spd-sl pedals, the sm-pd60 for regular double sided spd (although converts it to single sided).
It’s pretty easy to double check, just do a google search for the exploded diagram of your pedal model and shimano lists the id of the reflectors in there.
Still haven’t bothered coming
Still haven’t bothered coming up with a solution for my recumbent (add reflectors even knowing they’re invisible except to drones and moles? Stick a pair of pedals with reflectors on the tail bag?)
I’m trusting to “extra visible anyway” plus “rarely do night rides on it” plus “common sense by authorities” (hmm…). Otherwise the only way they’d be visible from the rear is if you were riding something like Graeme Obree’s “beastie”…
For my Ultimate Commuter I
For my Ultimate Commuter I wanted pedal reflectors, which because I wanted fairly aggressive flats meant mostly wellgo, mg1s, on a second set, I have their V12s on the getting to work bike. All fitted with proper bolt on cateye reflectors. Not the easiest thing to find either, but when looking at SJS’s range of reflectors I saw that Shimano supply a lot of reflectors for their pedals, including for their downhill Saints. Which are also rare, grrr, so much I had to go to Evans. Superb pedals, grippy and solid, and the SPD axle is far more resistant to filth ingress than the ubiquitous bushing, and so much easier to service. And the £14 a set of Shimano reflectors have an ingenious attachment. Hard wearing so far too. Reflectors on Shimano’s top downhill pedal. Nice.
thrawed wrote:
While shimano’s clipless pedals don’t usually come with reflectors, there is almost always compatible reflectors sold separately that conform to the BS 6102-2.
For example I used to rock the sm-pd62’s with my single sided pd-es600 spd’s during winter rides. And there’s the sm-pd65 or sm-pd63 for spd-sl pedals, the sm-pd60 for regular double sided spd (although converts it to single sided).
It’s pretty easy to double check, just do a google search for the exploded diagram of your pedal model and shimano lists the id of the reflectors in there.
Can’t seem to find any suitable for Shimano PD-ES600 single-sided SPD pedals.
Yes the sm-pd62 for the es600
Yes the sm-pd62 for the es600’s do seem to be sold out in quite a lot of places don’t they. Whether that’s just temporary or shimano for some reason has discontinued them it’s hard to say.
thrawed wrote:
Thanks for the product code – I can search for them now.
Found one link to them (https://www.beyond-bikes.co.uk/product/221492/shimano-sm-pd62-pd-a600-reflector-unit-pair/option/) but they seem a tad overpriced at £33.99.
To be fair, I was more curious and didn’t intend to buy them as I have never been stopped for not having enough reflectives – the law should be updated to allow reflectives on shoes and trousers to replace the pedal requirement.
The orange reflectors could
The orange reflectors could be made of tape. Searching for orange reflective tape produced a number of results for me.
To be legal they need to have
To be legal they need to have a BS kitemark.
You raise a good point,
You raise a good point, IanGlasgow: thank you. I have found guidance from CamCycle here:
https://www.camcycle.org.uk/magazine/newsletter92/article9/#:~:text=Legally%2C%20you%20MUST%20have%20a,unit%20as%20the%20rear%20light
Good stuff – and Cycling UK
Good stuff – and Cycling UK have a guide also. Overview here: https://www.cyclinguk.org/cycle-magazine/lighting-regulations
All the legal detail: https://www.cyclinguk.org/lighting-regulations
“Police would never concern
“Police would never concern themselves…”
Hah, depends on the plod. Up here in the land of kilts and total impunity for criminal motorists I was stopped *twice* by cops for not having pedal reflectors in the first six months I got back into cycling after the pandemic(I ride a dutch/granny bike but have huge floppy clown feet so had the bike shop replace the supplied dinky pedals which did have reflectors with nice chunky mountainbike ones, which didn’t). I was pulled over a *third* time to be lectured about not wearing a helmet – different bored piggie each time incidentally – and he inspected the bike quite thoroughly looking for other things to badger me about but by then I had ordered some relflectors online and epoxied them to the pedals.
If they’re bored, or petty, or just grumpy because Greggs had run out of steak bakes cops will *absolutely* pick up on such minor technicalities as an excuse to pick on cyclists. Even if only 10% of cops are human skidmarks, odds are you’ll have to deal with that brand eventually, and you can never know when a Magistrate or a jury are going to be Jeremy Clarkson fans.
Just stick some reflectors on, it’s an absolutely trivial effort and let’s be honest it isn’t *actually* going to hinder the performance of anyone normal, no matter how much pro aero carbon fibre kit people buy they’re not *actually* professional cyclists to whom every fraction of a gram matters.
You seem to be unlucky – I’ve
You seem to be unlucky – I’ve been cycling about Edinburgh and the surrounding area for over a decade, sometimes on conspicuous bikes (recumbents). Or ghost-riding a second bike to fix it / back from buying it. (Actually not surprised that aroused zero attention, bike theft deffo not a priority for them…)
Lately not wearing a helmet either (finally went looking for it the other day and it seems i can’t have owned one for years).
Not yet had any interest by Polis.
On the other hand … I’ve heard from a couple of contacts that they were stopped for some alledged cycling offenses, so it’s about.
Plus I was mostly cycling around places where I stayed (Granton / Pilton / Muirhouse) so perhaps the cops had better things to worry about there (I’m probably a little too old / not *quite* scruffy enough to pass as a bike-based dealer… and I don’t have power assist)?
Anywhere I should avoid to keep it that way? (Probably the nicer spots…)
“From a safety standpoint,
“From a safety standpoint, the product exceeds the intent of the regulation, even if it doesn’t match its literal wording.”
That depends on which characteristic of the mandated pedal reflectors you choose to consider. The article glosses over one of the chief benefits of pedal reflectors absent from these lights – long term reliability. The fact is, if you have pedal reflectors, they are going to work, virtually guaranteed. Battery operated tech, not so much.
The law already requires suitable lights after sunset. Complementing electric lighting with passive pedal reflectors reduces the risk that a cyclist ends up with no functioning visibility aids at all.
Also, the manufactured 5.5 factor can be cut in half since (as far as I can tell), these ornaments only “Look” rearwards.
Pedal reflectors provide
Pedal reflectors provide *another* level of visibility that doesn’t run out of power.
At least if your back light runs out of juice, pedal reflectors *may* just save your life.
Furthermore… they make finding the bike easier when you’re laying unconscious in a ditch ‘cos some cocksocket just ran you off the road.
My guess is that if a bike is
My guess is that if a bike is found to not be up to the highway code in this regard then a cyclist can be issued a fine.
But if the cyclist can show that they had plenty of other lights/reflectors on them/their bike to make them visible and challenged it and it went to court, I would hope the judge/magistrate would through out the case for being a waste of time.
Are you talking civil or
Are you talking civil or criminal?
If you’re talking about the police issuing fines (criminal) then yes, technically they could issue a fine (I think it would be a “conditional offer of a fixed penalty”), and if you decided to challenge it, I believe you would lose. It would be going to a magistrate, and they have no choice but to follow the letter of the law. They might be annoyed at the police and give you a negligible fine – or they might decide you are the one wasting their time by challenging a fine that was lawfully issued, and so punish you far more harshly than the initial fixed penalty offered by the police.
In terms of civil liability, then I agree it would be irrelevant – I believe the term used is “contributory negligence”, with emphasis on the “contributory”. If you were well lit, it would seem implausible your lighting being technically not compliant with the regulations would have had any impact on the resulting incident.
mitsky wrote:
Quite rightly, judges/magistrates have no mandate to rule on whether or not a law is good or bad or redundant, only Parliament can do that. If the police were petty enough to fine you and you took it to court admitting that you had broken the law you would be found guilty. “I think the law’s stupid” is not a defence.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Yes – you have to use the correct legal phrasing – “The law is an ass!” – or your defence will be summarily thrown out.
I’ve added some reflective
I’ve added some reflective tape to my cycling shoes because my pedals don’t support reflectors. Not that it will stop bad drivers in any case…
These pedals wouldn’t even be
These pedals wouldn’t even be legal in Look’s home country. The French highway code requires pedals to be fitted with orange reflectors, the same as in the UK: “Les pédales de tout cycle, cyclomoteur ou quadricycle léger à moteur doivent comporter des catadioptres de couleur orangée, sauf dans le cas des cyclomoteurs à deux roues à pédales rétractables.”
It seems to me that an ideal product would be a version with a built-in orange reflectors and an orange LED instead of a red light. That way, the cyclist is not only more visible in normal use but has a fail-safe product if the battery dies.
By the way, Look is quoting 10 hours of battery life with the lights set to their lowest power steady mode, so regular winter commuters are going to have to recharge the lights regularly.
Riding over here, across the
Riding over here, across the pond, we don’t have silly reflector laws (I don’t think). The study sited came out about 5 years ago. I’ve been attaching red flashers on my Sidis since. I get wierd comments but many people tell me they saw from way back, even during daylight
howyaBen wrote:
Apparently federal law mandates that all bicycles must be sold with pedal reflectors, whether they are compulsory on the road or not depends on the state. New Hampshire, I see, specifically addresses the clipless pedals problem by stating that it is not compulsory for them to have reflectors but it is compulsory for anyone riding with clipless pedals at night to have reflective materials on their shoes or ankles.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Which seems a very sensible approach and one that should be adopted over here.
Everywhere has regulations on
Everywhere has regulations on bike reflectors (okay, maybe not some third world countries). There’s a reason even high end bikes come with reflectors (that everyone removes) when they’re sold.
Riding over here, across the
Riding over here, across the pond, we don’t have silly reflector laws (I don’t think). The study sited came out about 5 years ago. I’ve been attaching red flashers on my Sidis since. I get wierd comments but many people tell me they saw from way back, even during daylight
I ride to protect myself from
I ride to protect myself from arrogant and ignorant drivers, police, so-called cycle infrastructure and motor myopia. I’m not interested in what police ‘think’ and enforce. It’s my life and that takes priority over all else.