We were lucky enough to have a new 2009 Isaac Sonic on our stand at Cycle ’08 and it certainly created quite a stir. We haven’t ridden it yet – they don’t allow that sort of thing at the Cycle show – but here’s the technical lowdown. What Isaac are aiming for is a race bike that you can ride all day, that’s extremely light, efficient, robust, comfortable, oh and it’s got to have killer looks as well. The They’ve certainly succeeded on the lightness bit anyway our bike weighed 14.8lb (6.7kg) on the road.cc scales and no arguing it’s a looker too. As for the ride we’ll let you know asap.
It’s tough too – surviving trial by tourer on the road.cc stand when one over-excited visitor managed to drop a bike on it not once, but twice in quick succession (a memorable show moment for all who were there…). Isaac’s design philosophy places great emphasis on the strength of natural forms, all their bikes have flowing curves rather than lots of straight lines – they are all also true monocoques meaning that the front triangle is one continuous structure without joints or sockets. Isaac maintain that a curved one-piece structure allows stresses to be dissipated more effectively allowing you to build a frame that is both light and strong. All those curves look pretty good too.
So what’s different for 2009? The big difference is something that you can’t see and will hopefully never get to experience, improved impact resistance. We reported on this from Eurobike but all new models have what Isaac are calling Synthetic Sphere resin added to the pre-preg carbon fibre this was developed by Isaac in collaboration with a Japanese university. This resins is used in conjunction with various grades of high and ultra-high modulus carbon filament, supplied by Japanese producers Torayca and Mitsubishi Rayon, are used, with an attractive 3K weave in the visible layer. The lamination is made up of between five and fifteen layers of uni-directional pre-preg carbon. All Isaac frames feature a continuous, woven, visible layer. The Sonic employs a 3K weave. This has an important structural function in that it increases resistance to de-lamination and bursting in the event of an accident. It also protects the underlying structure from knocks and abrasions. More Sonic pics
The latest Sonic also boasts a new monocoque fork, shaped specifically to complement the Sonic frame, which incorporates a dual diameter steerer. The reasoning behind this, say Isaac, is that having a larger diameter to the steerer at its base gives increased stiffness and safety without a weight penalty. It also allows an oversize lower head set bearing to better deal with the impacts and stresses. Dual diameter steerers are becoming more common and are an innovation we’ve noticed cropping up more and more particularly on top-end time trial machines. An FSA Orbit Carbon asymmetrical head set is also included to complete the frameset package. This has high-grade stainless bearings and a carbon fibre top cap. COMPLETE BIKE SUPPLIED TO ROAD.CC Our Sonic was a 54cm sized frameset (48, 51, 55.5, 57 and 60 are also available) built up with Isaac ‘bars, stem and seatpost, Shimano Dura Ace 7800 drivetrain and a set of Lightweight wheels. You can buy any Isaac either as a frameset or a complete bike. UK distributor RBS offer a custom build up option or they can supply it to your local Isaac dealer to do the same. Our bike weighed in at 14.8lb (6.7kg) as shown. Two colourways are available. White with carbon detailing or carbon/black with silver detailing. Sonic complete bike prices range from around £2,500 to £6,000. The Isaac Sonic 2009 is available from November 2008 at Isaac stockists across the UK. Isaac Sonic 2009 frameset UK srp £1,599.00 Bike as featured – approximate UK srp £5,250.00 For more Isaac information visit www.isaac-carbon.co.uk Product info line: 01329 820890
- Tech News
- Features

road.cc Exclusive: First Look Isaac Sonic 2009
Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
The problems mentioned in this article are far more wide-ranging than simply affecting the viability of hiring Saturday lads/lasses. Fixing bikes or selling bikes now requires so much more skill and knowledge than it did 10-20 years ago, but the pay is still rubbish, partly because public perception is that the job is easy and is just a hobby. Therefore people with the ability to be good at the job are not encouraged to stick around and they look elsewhere for a career that can earn a decent wage. I don't enjoy the fact that half the bikes that I work on have almost-unique parts that requires odd techniques, tools, or parts to repair and I first have to research what I need for many of them (despite having 20 years of experience). I'm now getting so much work that I could consider hiring someone else, but it would be impossible to find a skilled person who would work for the wage I can offer and it would take far too much of my time to train someone to a level where they can do more than the simplest 10% of the jobs that come in (whereas 10-20 years ago, after a small amount of training they probably could have done 30+% of the jobs). The complexity and uniqueness of modern bikes is apparently necessary to sell them, but soon there are going to be no mechanics left who will work for the wages that people are prepared to pay. At some point, people are going to have to admit that bike mechanics and salespeople are highly skilled and knowledgeable and should be reimbursed accordingly. Or, everyone can just order bikes online and watch YouTube repair videos and end up with a bike that barely works and isn't safe; but that's fine because they're just simple kids' toys, right?
I think the author is trying too hard to "both sides" this one. The basic error is Gove's - he was wandering across a pedestrian crossing on red for him with his head in a cup of coffee, and started well after it was on red. The Highway Code says "should not cross" in these circumstances. He then tried to excuse this by red herrings. Conservatives, including Gove, are supposed to have taking personal responsibility for their actions as a core value. Perhaps having the crooked coward Boris Johnson and Fruit Loop Liz as elected leaders demonstrates that this is merely historical. Gove is permitting a culture war being fought in the pages of his magazine; that is a war where Conservatives are demonising cycling because they hope it will save the rump Conservative Party. One example was their sudden reversal of support for the Welsh 20mph default limit. Should noodles have reacted less sharply - perhaps. A chat with Michael Gove to stop him wandering around the streets like a lobotomised koala may have been beneficial.
@mdavidford Funny, as soon as I saw your comment on the ticker on another article I knew to whom you must be replying.
@mctrials23 People have been suffering for years because they have been unlucky enough to have been hired by bad people, or had the bad luck to become ill. This is just bringing the system more into balance. I don't have a problem with encouraging people to start businesses but I don't agree with doing it by letting them exploit the poor and the desperate, if they need encouragement then offer state benefits for small businesses and use the claims process to make sure that they are doing everything they should to run the business properly including paying and training their employees. If they just want to get rich quick by exploiting others then they should be in the USA.
One may wonder why you've brought up DEI when it has nothing at all to do with anything in what Lappartient said. Or why you care about the state of the women's sport if you're so down on diversity, equity and inclusion. 🤷♂️
Not quite the first time, I rode over it back in the late twentyteens, just happened to see it was jammed nose-to-tail so thought it would be fun to filter along...turned out there was an overturned lorry at the eastern end blocking all carriageways. I honestly didn't know cycling was banned (the signs aren't very prominent), just assumed nobody rode on it because it would be suicidal in normal circumstances. Fortunately the weary copper at the other end who saw me just cut off my apologies and said, "Fuck off over there [a gap in the barrier to a slip road] and don't do it again."
They're not slalom barriers, they're Sheffield stands for parking your bike.
@momove I would think that spending time training someone up, putting the time and effort into that only to have most people move on relatively quickly isn't a great business model. I know there is the argument that "if your business has to take advantage of people to run then its not a viable business" but thats the reality of some of these shops. Up to a point, thats exactly what apprenticeships have always been. A business get cheap labour that might help them a bit and the apprentice learns something.
One may wonder why bureaucrat Lappartient wants to reinvent the wheel with a massive injection of DEI and drastic reduction of money. Let the best cyclists win, period. Meanwhile, women's pro peloton needs means and support to attract new sponsors, increase TV coverage, improve salaries and prize money.
So they want to pay people a pittance "for the experience", not record their leave accrued, have them ineligible for sickness pay, then complain about them not being experts on e-bikes, bikefitting and more?