We were lucky enough to have a new 2009 Isaac Sonic on our stand at Cycle ’08 and it certainly created quite a stir. We haven’t ridden it yet – they don’t allow that sort of thing at the Cycle show – but here’s the technical lowdown. What Isaac are aiming for is a race bike that you can ride all day, that’s extremely light, efficient, robust, comfortable, oh and it’s got to have killer looks as well. The They’ve certainly succeeded on the lightness bit anyway our bike weighed 14.8lb (6.7kg) on the road.cc scales and no arguing it’s a looker too. As for the ride we’ll let you know asap.
It’s tough too – surviving trial by tourer on the road.cc stand when one over-excited visitor managed to drop a bike on it not once, but twice in quick succession (a memorable show moment for all who were there…). Isaac’s design philosophy places great emphasis on the strength of natural forms, all their bikes have flowing curves rather than lots of straight lines – they are all also true monocoques meaning that the front triangle is one continuous structure without joints or sockets. Isaac maintain that a curved one-piece structure allows stresses to be dissipated more effectively allowing you to build a frame that is both light and strong. All those curves look pretty good too.
So what’s different for 2009? The big difference is something that you can’t see and will hopefully never get to experience, improved impact resistance. We reported on this from Eurobike but all new models have what Isaac are calling Synthetic Sphere resin added to the pre-preg carbon fibre this was developed by Isaac in collaboration with a Japanese university. This resins is used in conjunction with various grades of high and ultra-high modulus carbon filament, supplied by Japanese producers Torayca and Mitsubishi Rayon, are used, with an attractive 3K weave in the visible layer. The lamination is made up of between five and fifteen layers of uni-directional pre-preg carbon. All Isaac frames feature a continuous, woven, visible layer. The Sonic employs a 3K weave. This has an important structural function in that it increases resistance to de-lamination and bursting in the event of an accident. It also protects the underlying structure from knocks and abrasions. More Sonic pics
The latest Sonic also boasts a new monocoque fork, shaped specifically to complement the Sonic frame, which incorporates a dual diameter steerer. The reasoning behind this, say Isaac, is that having a larger diameter to the steerer at its base gives increased stiffness and safety without a weight penalty. It also allows an oversize lower head set bearing to better deal with the impacts and stresses. Dual diameter steerers are becoming more common and are an innovation we’ve noticed cropping up more and more particularly on top-end time trial machines. An FSA Orbit Carbon asymmetrical head set is also included to complete the frameset package. This has high-grade stainless bearings and a carbon fibre top cap. COMPLETE BIKE SUPPLIED TO ROAD.CC Our Sonic was a 54cm sized frameset (48, 51, 55.5, 57 and 60 are also available) built up with Isaac ‘bars, stem and seatpost, Shimano Dura Ace 7800 drivetrain and a set of Lightweight wheels. You can buy any Isaac either as a frameset or a complete bike. UK distributor RBS offer a custom build up option or they can supply it to your local Isaac dealer to do the same. Our bike weighed in at 14.8lb (6.7kg) as shown. Two colourways are available. White with carbon detailing or carbon/black with silver detailing. Sonic complete bike prices range from around £2,500 to £6,000. The Isaac Sonic 2009 is available from November 2008 at Isaac stockists across the UK. Isaac Sonic 2009 frameset UK srp £1,599.00 Bike as featured – approximate UK srp £5,250.00 For more Isaac information visit www.isaac-carbon.co.uk Product info line: 01329 820890
- Tech News
- Features

road.cc Exclusive: First Look Isaac Sonic 2009
Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@SVXY Rule 66 of the highway code says you can ride two abreast but to also 'be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups.' It does not say you can ride three or four abreast which would not be considerate of the needs of other road users. As the highway code is used by prosecution lawyers as evidence to convict in Road Traffic Act offences cases you certainly could therefore be prosecuted and convicted for careless cycling if cycling three or four abreast
@SVXY This is a curious tactic - rebutting your own argument with your very next sentence.
Affordable? Starting at £6K? You 'having a larf?
@SVXY Ah, so it *is* the "flood the zone with shit" argumentation technique then? Or perhaps ... you are genuinely unclear about the difference between the Highway code and the law (and perhaps the difference between cyclists, drivers and indeed horse riders? And rusty on safe practice? As mdavidford notes you appear to be confusing rule with Rule 66 (for cyclists, which doesn't say anything about not riding x abreast) with Rule 53 (for horse riders which gives guidance not to more than double up - I don't think this is a direct summary of any law since "should" not "must"). Charitably I'm going with "*i* know what it says!" which as I noted many of people feel they do. Anyway away with you, I feel you've had your fill of attention for today.
Road tax was abolished in 1937 by Winston Churchill because, as he said, "road tax makes motorists believe they are the moral owners of our roads." He got that right.
@SVXY None of the magistrates who sentenced him said the CPS should have charged him with dangerous driving. Why should they? He was not speeding, he was not on his phone and he was not drunk or under the influence of drugs either
@SVXY The court does not decide on whether someone was driving carelessly or dangerously, they can only decide on the guilt or otherwise of the defendant on the charge the CPS decides to lay against them. The CPS is notorious for preferring to charge careless rather than dangerous because it's an easier win; this results in entirely unjust sentences such as this one.
@Rendel Harris Wearing sandals may be fine if cycling on tracks over fields or in a quiet residential street with a 20 or 30mph limit. It is not sensible cycling on a 60mph main road
@chrisonabike maybe, but things that used to be banter & jokes in the 1960s/1970s have (thankfully) become socially unacceptable , and this is mostly because enough people spoke up about it. We even managed to make drink-driving a lot less acceptable, by the same means.
@Rendel Harris Yes, he was driving at 55mph in a 60mph road. The court verdict was he was not driving dangerously but carelessly eg he should have had his visor down to keep out the sun so he could monitor the road ahead.