We were lucky enough to have a new 2009 Isaac Sonic on our stand at Cycle ’08 and it certainly created quite a stir. We haven’t ridden it yet – they don’t allow that sort of thing at the Cycle show – but here’s the technical lowdown. What Isaac are aiming for is a race bike that you can ride all day, that’s extremely light, efficient, robust, comfortable, oh and it’s got to have killer looks as well. The They’ve certainly succeeded on the lightness bit anyway our bike weighed 14.8lb (6.7kg) on the road.cc scales and no arguing it’s a looker too. As for the ride we’ll let you know asap.
It’s tough too – surviving trial by tourer on the road.cc stand when one over-excited visitor managed to drop a bike on it not once, but twice in quick succession (a memorable show moment for all who were there…). Isaac’s design philosophy places great emphasis on the strength of natural forms, all their bikes have flowing curves rather than lots of straight lines – they are all also true monocoques meaning that the front triangle is one continuous structure without joints or sockets. Isaac maintain that a curved one-piece structure allows stresses to be dissipated more effectively allowing you to build a frame that is both light and strong. All those curves look pretty good too.
So what’s different for 2009? The big difference is something that you can’t see and will hopefully never get to experience, improved impact resistance. We reported on this from Eurobike but all new models have what Isaac are calling Synthetic Sphere resin added to the pre-preg carbon fibre this was developed by Isaac in collaboration with a Japanese university. This resins is used in conjunction with various grades of high and ultra-high modulus carbon filament, supplied by Japanese producers Torayca and Mitsubishi Rayon, are used, with an attractive 3K weave in the visible layer. The lamination is made up of between five and fifteen layers of uni-directional pre-preg carbon. All Isaac frames feature a continuous, woven, visible layer. The Sonic employs a 3K weave. This has an important structural function in that it increases resistance to de-lamination and bursting in the event of an accident. It also protects the underlying structure from knocks and abrasions. More Sonic pics
The latest Sonic also boasts a new monocoque fork, shaped specifically to complement the Sonic frame, which incorporates a dual diameter steerer. The reasoning behind this, say Isaac, is that having a larger diameter to the steerer at its base gives increased stiffness and safety without a weight penalty. It also allows an oversize lower head set bearing to better deal with the impacts and stresses. Dual diameter steerers are becoming more common and are an innovation we’ve noticed cropping up more and more particularly on top-end time trial machines. An FSA Orbit Carbon asymmetrical head set is also included to complete the frameset package. This has high-grade stainless bearings and a carbon fibre top cap. COMPLETE BIKE SUPPLIED TO ROAD.CC Our Sonic was a 54cm sized frameset (48, 51, 55.5, 57 and 60 are also available) built up with Isaac ‘bars, stem and seatpost, Shimano Dura Ace 7800 drivetrain and a set of Lightweight wheels. You can buy any Isaac either as a frameset or a complete bike. UK distributor RBS offer a custom build up option or they can supply it to your local Isaac dealer to do the same. Our bike weighed in at 14.8lb (6.7kg) as shown. Two colourways are available. White with carbon detailing or carbon/black with silver detailing. Sonic complete bike prices range from around £2,500 to £6,000. The Isaac Sonic 2009 is available from November 2008 at Isaac stockists across the UK. Isaac Sonic 2009 frameset UK srp £1,599.00 Bike as featured – approximate UK srp £5,250.00 For more Isaac information visit www.isaac-carbon.co.uk Product info line: 01329 820890
- Tech News
- Features

road.cc Exclusive: First Look Isaac Sonic 2009
Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@chrisonabike True, things went back to normal once the pandemic was over. In this case, however the problems are still ongoing, and aren't likely to be resolved in the near future. If anything, they're going to get worse. Food shortages are predicted because of the effect that the heatwave has had on crops. This is bound to push prices up. The Straits of Hormuz aren't likely to reopen anytime soon and the strategic oil reserves are running low. Russia is having to import petrol because its own refineries have been badly hit, so that's even more competition for an even more scarce resource. I think that more and more people are going to see cycling as a way of cutting household bills.
I think if "grown up" cyclists * are quibbling about ASLs we've very much missed the road safety point anyway. (Not to mention the wider "better transport choices" picture). ASLs are poor-to-useless "cycling infra", even for their design intent. If the idea is "for less confident cyclists" then a design that requires that you re-position in front of the motor traffic - waiting to accelerate - seems unhelpful. Of course they're only designed to help when traffic is stopped, and you can reach the front in time and if vehicles aren't already occupying them. As we're noting here drivers frequently ignore them - whether that be deliberate, a lack of road craft, because they were concentrating on following the vehicle in front, or because the paint has rubbed off. * Aside: shouldn't cycling also be safe and accessible for kids? Or should they only be allowed to do this when accompanied by sufficient qualified adults? Or be limited to parks and otherwise being driven around by their carers? Perhaps there is another way...?
Hi Bungle, I saw you follow-up comment. I can't imaging there's a tolerance of 4 seconds on camera enforced lights, seems an odd decision - an offence is committed if a vehicle starts crossing on a red, any tolerance is discretionary. There does seem to be some odd thinking about 'advanced stop lines' where the rules relating to them are identical to a regular stop line, as explained correctly elsewhere in the Highway Code. It does seem a regular offence. Where I live it doesn't help that some of them are very faint and disappear in rain.
@ktache Not sure he's totally ruled out of the worlds yet (though I think it would be best if he doesn't), normal recovery time is about eight weeks but surgery can halve that...depending on the nature of the break he could be just about fit to ride by the time of the elite men's race, but he'll have missed a lot of training. Hopefully his managers and team will persuade him to wait until Lombardia, if not just to knock it off for the rest of the year.
@Bungle_52 The Met told me a couple of years ago when rejecting a submission that they needed a clear three seconds of red visible before they would consider it for an RLJ prosecution. I pointed out to them that this meant that at 30 mph a driver could see a light change to red from 40 metres away and still get through without sanction, or 55 m if they accelerated to 40 as most do. They just replied "them's our rules..."
@Ben Graham I have just checked the footage from my report. The driver crosses the 1st stop line 4 seconds after the light turns red. All on camera from behind the vehicle. No further action. So I assume the margin is at least 4 seconds.
Oh, and active travel funding per head (in England at least) is laughable compared to other places. Plus it is delivered intermittently. It's more like a Blue Peter contest...
Yup, I see those opportunities being missed all the time in Edinburgh. When it gets really bad, dig it all up and put it back down again how it was. Contrast with what seems to happen in NL - when things are dug up the whole thing seems to get a "let's redo this according to the current standards" treatment. They even coordinate with the utilities, so that after a refurb the street isn't immediately dug up again because of leaking pipes / we suddenly realised the new estate being planned for round the corner will want broadband etc. Pros and cons of course - you may wait longer there for changes as smaller changes may be deferred until a major redo is due. (Though in the UK case you likely wouldn't get them at all...) It seems we "can't have nice things" in the UK in part because a) we have greater motor traffic speeds/volumes spead across "streets" / within urban areas b) the funding and organisational responsibility differs. Are we in the "Sam Vimes boots" territory (being too poor to afford better products which not only save money over time but actually work)? There is long term money pressure on LAs and it seems that due to poor construction and maintenance we have to regularly pour money into (pot-)holes in the road. And it seems there's no budget to check up on or enforce adequate standards from utilities work or even private building.
Shame about the world champs defence. Speedy recovery. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/aug/30/tadej-pogacar-vuelta-a-espana-cycling-crash-hospital-stage-nine
I believe the accepted form for this kind of argument is "I know you are, you said you were, but what am I?".