A cyclist who was left with blood pouring from a head wound after he was attacked and robbed of his bike while riding alongside a canal in Birmingham by a pair of masked thugs, one of whom hit him with a hammer, has said that police advised him to avoid that section of towpath in the future, leaving him asking, “What sort of message does that send out?”
Birmingham Live reports that the cyclist, now aged 66, got in touch with the news website to recount his ordeal after the media outlet reported on a number of other incidents on the city’s waterways, including one in which a woman was hit with a brick as she walked along the towpath.
Recalling his own experience the cyclist, who was aged 64 at the time of the attack in October 2021 in which he was mugged for his bike, which he said was worth £500, told Birmingham Live that it happened as he rode through a tunnel along the canal in Small Heath.
The man, who was following a route he rides regularly, believes that accomplices of his assailants had texted them to alert them to his approach. After the attack, drivers on nearby road came to his assistance after he managed to reach it.
He says that police were on the scene within two minutes, and that officers advised him not to ride “that route again” – a warning that he has heeded.
He told the website: “I was coming up to Small Heath and there was a guy sitting on one of the lock gates with a phone just before a tunnel. And I said to the police ‘I think he texted the people in the tunnel’.
“As I went through the tunnel a guy pushed me and I nearly went into the canal. If I’d had gone in the canal that could have been ‘Good night, Vienna’.
“He came up and hit me a few times and then I was trying to sort of hold him off and then someone came up behind me and whacked me on the head with a hammer.
“”I fell down and as I got up they were going away with the bike and I grabbed the back tyre and they were going up the ramp to get on the road towards Small Heath and another hammer blow came on my head. I staggered into the road and my head was like that photo I showed you; all the cars were stopping.”
Officers took the cyclist, who also had money and his phone stolen in the robbery, to hospital where his wounds were treated, including stitches being inserted.
“I’ve come out alright but I do get flashbacks from it now and again where I think I’m fighting them – I think it’s the trauma of it sometimes,” the man explained.
“There’s been quite a few attacks on there and police said to me ‘don’t do that route again’: what sort of message does that send out? You see the odd police now and again but they’re too stretched aren’t they?”
We’ve reported on a number of attacks on cyclists on towpaths in and around the West Midlands city in recent years, including one in November 2021 in which a rider was pushed into a canal by men wearing balaclavas who tried to steal his bike.
That was one of several such incidents that happened in autumn of that year, the same period in which the victim speaking to Birmingham Live was attacked, leading to West Midlands Police stepping up patrols on canals.
“It’s getting worse now,” he said. “Someone’s going to get badly hurt. CCTV would be ideal but to put CCTV in parts would cost a horrendous amount and it’s all about cost at the end of the day.”
Away from Birmingham’s canals, last week we reported how a cyclist was robbed of his £3,300 bike by a group of thugs on his own doorstep in the Kingstanding area of the city.
> Man robbed of £3,300 bike on own doorstep by gang of thugs
Craig Pickering needed hospital treatment for a head injury he sustained during the violent attack, and believes the gang, whom he said were riding electric motorcycles, had deliberately targeted him after observing him riding his Trek Remedy 8 Bike to and from work.
46 thoughts on ““What sort of message does that send out?” – Cyclist mugged for bike on Birmingham canal advised by police to avoid route in future”
I don’t know what the answer
I don’t know what the answer to muggings on urban canal towpaths is – probably increased cycle patrols and some targeted, intelligence-led surveillance, maybe. It’s difficult to manage that sort of crime away without resources, because the bandits do tend to wait until the rozzers aren’t around.
But that should be the alert for local authorities: towpaths are not cycle infrastructure. They may be leisure routes, but they don’t have the traffic and natural surveillance necessary for people to be/feel safe.
Cycle infrastructure should go where people want to go. And the clue is that there are roads that already go there. We need to apportion road space from motor traffic to create safe walking and cycling routes and space.
GMBasix wrote:
Amen!
Amen again!
Remote (police) controlled
Remote (police) controlled drones with flame throwers would be a good start. Steal a bike / mug someone and run offf… tough luck scumbag, the police have you in their sights (quite literally).
GMBasix wrote:
Surveillance ducks, to start with?
chrisonatrike wrote:
Surely a swan
Police don’t have the budget
Police don’t have the budget these days dontchaknow?
Luckily there are already some DIY instructions for mallard-based version.
A sure way to get policing
A sure way to get policing where it’s needed is too set up a vigilante group.
It’s similar to filling in potholes. Do it yourself and within minutes, a pothole ‘repair’ team remove your solid repair and fill it with liquorice, to last a few days.
I think the real solution is
I think the real solution is to attack the problem from the other end and make it much more difficult to sell the ill-gotten gains: anyone who regularly buys and sells bikes knows how to spot the stolen ones on Gumtree/Marketplace/eBay, if the police employed a handful of experts to pick them out and then send plainclothes officers round posing as buyers it would surely be a massive deterrent for this sort of crime and indeed all forms of bike theft (rather than as at present actually refusing to go round and challenge a thief even when the owner has spotted their bike for sale). Maybe they could even get insurance companies involved, it’s very much in their interests to have stolen bikes recovered.
Rendel Harris wrote:
It seems logical. My concern is, in the grand scheme of things, it just isn’t in their interests. Otherwise they would.
I’m sure the ABI has the clout to pick up the phone to the 5-O and say, “here’s a bunch of cash, we want a squad!”
GMBasix wrote:
That would be very
That would be very interesting. There should also be established a formal bike sale protocol.
Of course some of them may be sold overseas but it is a good start.
Rendel Harris wrote:
That might catch some casual thieves, but what about the ones that strip and sell the parts?
I think honeypot bikes are the answer – police deploy some tracked bikes in a theft hotspot, wait for them to be stolen, and then just follow/track them down and catch them red handed.
The “Gone in 60 seconds –
The “Gone in 60 seconds – bike crime wave” on youtube is quite dated now but was an interesting watch. There was a guy on there who stole 102 bikes and received a 5 month suspended sentence, they sure told him.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Somewhere like Winchester Railway station, maybe…?
https://road.cc/content/news/cyclists-warned-not-park-train-station-theft-hotspot-304197
This makes total sense.
This makes total sense.
However, I’m reminded of a friends experience. Had his bike stolen, however the bike had an Airtag. My friend called the police and outlined the last know ‘ping’ from the tag, which was a residential house.
8.30am in the morning, the Police knock on the door, enter the property. The owner gladly shows them around the house / garage. The garage was reportedly full of very expensive bikes, however none met the description of my friends bike.
The Police – ‘nothing further to see here.’
To everyone else – ‘isn’t it incredibly coincidental that the Airtag should happen to stop at a location that is full of expensive bicycles?’
My point being… the police aren’t interested… it’s deemed a victimless crime.
Create a bike with a booby
Create a bike with a booby trap inside it on a countdown timer that can easily be started by the rider as it’s being stolen.
My first thought, a few kg of gunpowder and rusty nails inside the frame, is probably a bit harsh. As is my second thought, nozzles spraying burning methanol in all directions.
Something between spraying out a couple of litres of sewage mixed with capsaicin and indelible skin dye, and a glitter bomb, is probably appropriate.
Hey, it’s the same advice the
Hey, it’s the same advice the police themselves follow; if it’s good enough for them…
Unless its ancient I would
Unless its ancient I would have though a Remedy FS would be worth more than £500…. Thieves probably thought so.
Secret_squirrel wrote:
The gentleman who was robbed on the towpath said his bike (no model given) was worth £500, the Remedy (stated here as being £3300, presumably that’s the new price) belongs to another chap who was mugged on his doorstep in Birmingham last week.
I’ve got to be the point
I’ve got to be the point where it’s just not worth cycling any more. You risk attack on the roads, streets, paths and in the media. There’s no enjoyment anymore. I’m selling up and moving on.
squidgy wrote:
What a wet wipe.
S13SFC wrote:
What a wet wipe.— squidgy
NOT the spirit. We need to pick up this and flag the issue to all powers that wish to be.
S13SFC wrote:
Yeah, ha ha, what a wuss, man up, the worst that can happen to you is that you can lose a leg, get smashed on the head with a hammer and live the rest of your life brain-damaged, or get killed. Violence against cyclists is a really serious problem and I wouldn’t criticise anybody who decided they would stop cycling because of it – already in winter my wife only cycle commutes if I ride with her because of the risk she faces as a woman in the parks and quieter streets in the winter dark. Do you know the above poster’s sex or age, where they live and the risks they might face in cycling? No you don’t. It would certainly have to get a lot worse before I would even think of modifying my cycling habits, let alone giving up, but then I’m a 6 foot tall male weighing 85 kg with the (fading) remnants of a rugby player’s physique. It’s neither fair nor kind to mock other people’s genuine and justifiable fears about the risks cycling may entail for them.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Statistically, you’re much more likely (up to 10x depending on seriousness) to come to harm at the hands of a stranger than she is. And (statistically) by taking you with her she’s bringing the person most likely by far to cause her harm.
Anecdotally, while most women I know have stories of depressing amounts of verbal harassment and scary behaviour (likely in the same parks you go through), I can’t think of any who have been assaulted by strangers so that they needed medical assistance. I have, and probably half the men I know well have. (And the majority of those not due to ‘coming off worst in a fight’, I’m neither 85kg nor rugby-minded).
That’s not to minimise street harassment, which is pretty horrific around here and needs to be clamped down on. But the focus on reducing violence (from strangers) against women misses what I think the actual problem is: a large subset of men are violent bullies, and will violently bully people where they think they can get away with it. The sex of the victims or whether they’re a cyclist is incidental to their motivation.
Brauchsel wrote:
Aggghhh some FACTS!
It’s very true what you have said, and often overlooked, because, well, men should be able to cope right?
Left_is_for_Losers wrote:
The second statistic doesn’t matter, though. I’m sure he and she are both aware whether or not he’s an actual danger to her. He’s not, after presumably being married for decades, going to suddenly assault her with no past history of that behaviour.
andystow wrote:
With no offence intended to Rendell or his wife, people for various reasons do sometimes become dangerous after not having been before. Stress, affairs, mental illnesses etc. I wouldn’t be overly surprised if the incidence of that was broadly similar for women to being seriously assaulted by a stranger.
It was mostly a glib aside, but there was a point. If we can’t eradicate male violence, it’d seem better to help women identify violent men (and to leave them safely when in relationships with them) than to make them frightened to go out at night when they’re actually not at much risk of harm.
I understood the point and it
I understood the point and it is a valid one. I also take your point about the relative levels of danger. However there are dangers out there for women alone at night (Wayne Couzens etc, and also the increasing danger of “live” bike theft), so as long as I have the opportunity of mitigating the danger, however small, I’ll take it. Plus I enjoy it and it gets me out for 50kms+ that I probably wouldn’t do on a winter’s day otherwise!
If your concerned about the
If your concerned about the risk of being attacked, maybe joining a local club would be a far better solution that just quitting completely. The security of the group and the added benefit of a friendship group would still keep you riding. If you just stop you will let the scumbags win. Remember – together we are stronger.
The growth in Zwift/SYSTM
The growth in Zwift/SYSTM/Rouvy etc is because the UK is becoming an unpoliced chaotic collection of Mad Max roads.
In the past Ive cycled into
In the past Ive cycled into Brum from Tamworth via the canal and road. The Tyburn Road (A38) was quicker than the nearby canal and actually felt safer.
Since I retired I have no reason to go into Birmingham, so problem solved.
But IMO Birmingham is not a cycle friendly city and the canals (especially the little bridges) are quite scary at times.
I’ve had the misfortune to
I’ve had the misfortune to visit Birmingham a number of times. Each time I ask myself why I didn’t just stay at home and punch myself repeatedly in the face.
I like to think I’m in good
I like to think I’m in good shape and could scrap if needed, but the scum out there targeting cyclists are going to be wielding knives or worse. We have the right to cycle everywhere, but until the police step up and protect us rather than persecute us, I will stick to the busier A-roads.
I like to think I’m in good
I like to think I’m in good shape and could scrap if needed
Alexei Sayle, in his excellent Imaginary Sandwich Bar monologues (see Rage and Resentment) describes this as ‘being all that‘. They would, as you imply, just cosh and stab you secure in the knowledge that any crime against a cyclist would receive a sympathetic hearing from the justice system
.
.
Wise move, Ren Dell. Look after yourself.
.
…A-roads where the Daily
…A-roads where the Daily Mail wielding Range Rover driver can instead hit you with a 2 tonne SUV. Hammer to the head or body blow with heavy machinery? Either way, you’re cycling scum and the CPS aren’t interested.
Instead, best to drive, get heart disease and die slowly soaking up NHS resources.
It’s what makes Britain grate.
I’m beginning to change my
I’m beginning to change my views on the helmet debate..
Armed response.
Armed response.
chrisonabike wrote:
This is the Way.
Times are a changing… once
Times are a changing… once upon a time, you’d be mugged with the threat of violence, these days muggers go straight to hitting people in the head with a hammer.
I’m sorry, but if I hit someone in the head with a hammer, I’d realistically expect to be doing permanent and potentially fatal damage to my victim. Which raises two questions;
1. are these people so scummy, that they’d happily take a life for a shitty second hand bike?
2. are the police so underfunded / incapacitated that their only point of action in the face of such serious crime (and to me striking someone multiple times in the head with a hammer is a very serious crime) is to warn people to stay away from the naughty boys?
And a third question…
When does society say enough is enough? When do we say, well if the authorities aren’t going to do anything, the community will need to come together and take action ourselves?
Police should put more
Police should put more resource into these crimes, they surely have it – just misspronounce someones pronoun online and see how many turn up…
WOKE!
WOKE!
I wouldn’t mind a bit more policing of e.g. road crimes etc. Clearly they’ve given up on stealing though. I’d agree there seems to be a bit of a slump in policing but honestly – was there ever a “golden era” for police performance (which didn’t involve lots of “he looked like a wrong’un sarge, so me and the boys helped him up when he fell down the stairs a few times and now he’s confessed”)?
chrisonabike wrote:
Definitely not as far as bike theft is concerned. I first had a bike stolen in 1986, reported it at the police station and was given a crime number for the insurance and pretty much told that was all I could expect to get; got exactly the same reaction the last time I had a bike stolen in 2015. I suppose if one were trying to be positive it hasn’t got any worse!
I wouldn’t mind a bit more
I wouldn’t mind a bit more policing of e.g. road crimes etc. Clearly they’ve given up on stealing though
In some areas, they’ve given up on everything to do with offences on the road. I won’t burden you all with yet another picture of WU59 UMH (last seen 8 days ago), but such determined inaction against someone with a Facebook page advertising his agricultural groundworks business, a pickup with no MOT, insurance or VED for 6 1/2 years which also bears his phone numbers, a failed MOT for dangerous defects, numerous reports to the police and PCC…? The PCC himself regularly launches PR campaigns about how much action the police are taking- the most recent was yesterday. Yet his email about WU59 UMH simply says he ‘cannot interfere with operational decisions of the police’ and suggests I complain to…the police.
So we now have West Midlands
So we now have West Midlands Police admitting that there are ‘no go areas’ in their patch.
Surely easier for West
Surely easier for West Midlands Police to promote safe areas, as these are much smaller spaces?