Welcome to Tuesday on the road.cc live blog with Simon MacMichael, Jack Sexty and the rest of the team.
- News

Live blog: Cyclist pops wheelie, falls off, almost gets run over, US study finds local news “subtly, but consistently, blames vulnerable road users for crashes”, Twitter acronym tribute to legendary Liggett TdF commentary, Video: crit carnage + more
SUMMARY

eBay seller wants £150,000 for Rapha x Paul Smith Grand Depart jersey
An eBay seller who in 2017 listed a Rapha x Paul Smith London 2007 Tour de France Grand Depart jersey on the website with a Buy It Now price of £10,000 is looking to sell the same garment – or at least, one that is identical – but this time, it will cost you a cool £150,000.
The limited edition jersey cost £175 when it went on sale a little over a decade ago and gas achieved iconic status, even appearing in a retrospective of Sir Paul Smith’s work at the Design Museum in London five years ago.
Tour Down Under Stage 1 highlights
The World Tour kicked off early this morning in Australia with the first stage of the Tour Down Under. A sprint stage to begin with, so one for the flat track bullies to have a go at. And who came out on top? Watch the highlights to find out!
Criterium carnage
A quite phenomenal acronym...
And I’m done. Look back through my timeline and read the first word of each of my Tweets and you’ll find a, quite frankly, bizarre tribute to the greatest cycling commentary of all time.
And here it is (about 2 minutes in) enjoy! https://t.co/qiV6zOmTZM
— Cillian Kelly (@irishpeloton) January 14, 2019
Cillian Kelly may have a little too much time on his hands, but this is pretty impressive all the same! Ic you have a Twitter account, check out Kelly’s profile and read the first word of each tweet from the top-down.
Barking mad
This is one hell of a cool photo!
Defo needs a bike fit...
Pedalling into the first race of the UCI WorldTour calendar like… @tourdownunder pic.twitter.com/5sfoZw8sKu
— UCI (@UCI_cycling) January 14, 2019
Elia Viviani wins first stage of 2019 at the Tour Down Under
When you win the first stage of the @UCI_cycling WorldTour Congratulations @eliaviviani … #tourdownunder pic.twitter.com/0UVafdqsBS
— Santos Tour Down Under (@tourdownunder) January 15, 2019
The Quick Step sprinter bagged his first victory of the year, out-kicking Max Walscheid of Team Sunweb and winning by more than two bike lengths.
American study finds vulnerable road users are "subtly, but consistently, blamed for crashes" in local news coverage
The Texas A&M University study, titled ‘Editorial Patterns in Bicyclist and Pedestrian Crash Reporting’, says that local news reports generally show overly negative reporting towards car crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists, often using terminology to suggest the victim may have been at fault. The study scraped 200 news articles from a two month period from early 2018, 100 involving cyclists and 100 pedestrians, and used content and linguistic analysis to examine how the information assigned blame and if the injuries and deaths were framed as public health issues.
They found that only 65% of articles identified the ‘agent’ who hit the vulnerable road user, and in 35% of cases the crash just ‘happened’ without describing any details. They also found 73% of articles emphasised mentions of the vulnerable road user, which is found to receive more blame. 48% of articles suggested that the incident could have been avoided if the VRU’s behaviour was different i.e. wearing high-vis clothing or crossing only at designated crossings. The researchers recommends this for journalists: “We first suggest journalists be aware of the relationship between grammatical choices and perceived blame. As a test, try replacing the word “car” with the word “hammer” when describing a crash. “A person was hit by a hammer” sounds strange, as someone must have been holding it. “Hit by a car” similarly obscures agency. Next, journalists should use public health framing when describing crashes. Linking each instance to the epidemic of VRU deaths will help bring about meaningful solutions. Finally, we advise journalists to include elements that humanize VRU crash victims when possible.”
Do you think crashes involving cyclists and pedestrians are often wrongly reported in the UK too?
Police hunt Bristol cyclist who seriously injured pedestrian in hit-and-run crash
Avon & Somerset Constabulary have launched a witness appeal after a cyclist and pedestrian were in a collision this morning, with the bike rider subsequently fleeing the scene. The appeal reads:
We’re appealing for information after a woman sustained potentially life-changing injuries in a collision in East Street, Bedminster.
The incident involved a man on a bicycle and a woman pedestrian. It happened just before 9am on Tuesday 15 January.
A woman is in hospital for treatment.
The cyclist left the scene of the crash in East Street, Bedminster. Officers are currently trying to trace him. We have seized a bike as part of our enquiries and the road remains closed while the investigation continues.
If you can help please get in touch quoting reference 5219010049
We will of course be keeping an eye on this story to see how it develops.
A familiar sight on British streets?
Haringey wants a reputation for being a walking and cycling borough nationally – yet this is what greets pedestrians on our streets….it’s time for change @haringeycouncil @kirstenhearn @CllrEjiofor @HaringeyCyclist @CrescentRdChaos @livingstreets @ZenaBrabazon pic.twitter.com/UsvPMxRRoc
— Catherine Kenyon (@cmdkenyon) January 15, 2019
Koo eyewear partners with Trek-Segafredo
The Word Tour team’s men’s and women’s squads will wear Koo shades for at least the next two years. They will wear the Open Cube and Orion sunglasses for the 2019 season, and have already being debuted at the Tour Down Under. head over to Koo’s website for more product info.
Video: Cyclist pops wheelie, falls off, almost gets run over
A dashcam user in Lincolnshire has filmed the moment that a cyclist popping a wheelie in Spalding fell off his bike and was almost run over, with the motorist managing to avoid the rider, who was apparently unhurt – apart, perhaps, for his pride. Maybe best leave it to the likes of Peter Sagan and Danny MacAskill, eh?
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
11 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
I don't know what others think but I thought it was a mistake to cancel the event. I live in one of the areas they cycle though and it didn't seem to bad. Even the few accounts I have watched didn't show cancelling weather, waiting under a tree maybe.
@chrisonabike exactly, words are cheap. They can safely bang the drum knowing that little will or can be done. OK, some things could be done, but the chance of nobody cocking something up . . ? Realist or pessimist, take your pick; but still optimistic enough to hope that things will work out :-)
@ChrisA isn't this story more along the lines of "tobacco company is demanding government crackdown on nasty rolling papers and dangerous pipes?" Silly of me! How could there be any conflict between and "improving things for their ... definitely not employees ... and the public at large" and these companies' entire business model...?
"Deliveroo has announced a crackdown on modified and ‘dangerous’ e-bikes . . . . . company is calling on the Government to prohibit the sale of unsafe e-bike conversion kits." Really? Do they not know how difficult it is to legislate for such things, the politicians inability to understand details, the competence of the DoJ in drafting such legislation and what seems to be a widespread disregard of those rules; not to mention the total lack of enforcement. Just saying.
@Nigel Garage The Mercedes driver drove through the light three seconds after it turned amber. Official government text: "AMBER means STOP. You may go on only if the amber appears after you have crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident." Three seconds is more than enough time to stop safely at the speed the Mercedes was going so the driver was breaking the law and therefore committing a prosecutable offence. Deliberately putting others at risk and breaking the law is not "acceptable" and if you saw a cyclist running a red in those circumstances you would rightly condemn it. Is there anything you can't be completely wrong about?
I see quite a few MAAP items out in the Surrey Hills. The new shop has a cafe and they're from Melbourne so the coffee should be good: I'm looking forward to visiting.
@chrisonabike Mercedes was acceptable, but the second one (old Toyota people carrier/ex-taxi) was a prosecutable offence.
I wasn't saying that nor talking about people who say that. I said it was silly to claim that wearing a helmet indicates acceptance of dangerous driving and poor infrastructure. I choose to wear a helmet; I also regularly report dangerous driving to the police and correspond with councils and road authorities about ways infrastructure could be improved for cyclists. I rather doubt I'm the only helmet wearer who does so.
11 thoughts on “Live blog: Cyclist pops wheelie, falls off, almost gets run over, US study finds local news “subtly, but consistently, blames vulnerable road users for crashes”, Twitter acronym tribute to legendary Liggett TdF commentary, Video: crit carnage + more”
Erm? Where’s the article
Erm? Where’s the article about the US study?
brooksby wrote:
It should be there now, apologies for keeping you hangin!
Jack Sexty wrote:
Erm? Where’s the article about the US study?
— Jack Sexty It should be there now, apologies for keeping you hangin!— brooksby
Got it! Thanks, Jack.
The UK is at least as bad
The UK is at least as bad with regards the media reporting RTCs. Some of us have joked about autonomous vehicles hitting cyclists as the reporting almost never mentions the driver.
The media reporting of
The media reporting of cyclist/driver collisions is at least as biased as that elsewere, and probably more so. Exactly the same removal of the driver, with just a car, as if the things drove without a person controlling them.
Not mentioned in that report, but equally valid, is the helmet, and it is always implied that cyclists contributed to their injuries by not wearing one, or as the recent report of the coroner, overtly blamed for not wearing one. They very rarely mention that the fault was the driver’s or that the collision wouldn’t have happened if the driver had taken proper care. Neither that a helmet would have saved a pedestrian.
And we are all familiar with blaming of the cyclist in collisions with HGVs, when it is always the blind spot that the cyclist recklessly rode into, never the driver’s fault.
Then there is the failure to wear hi-viz, also the cyclists’ fault, not the driver’s for not looking.
burtthebike wrote:
Totally agree, you never see headlines that say something like “cyclist killed by driver of a car without blindspot mirrors” but frequently see headlines stating the lack of safety equipment on the cyclists part.
ClubSmed wrote:
Been watching an American series about air crashes, where they examine the causes in minute detail and issue recommendations to prevent further crashes from the same cause. We need a system like this for road collisions, as the police don’t have the expertise, or resources to do it. Too often, the driver’s explanation is accepted “sun in eyes” “they appeared from nowhere” etc without proper forensic examination of the evidence.
I’m sure the 2014 review is going to cover this.
Also a criminal who uses a
Also a criminal who uses a bike to get to/from a crime is a cyclist. like the cyclist who brandished a zombie knife when “just clipped by an innocent motorist”.
You never hear that Lee Rigby whas murdered by two motorists.
Personally I found the “just clipped” to be extremely dangerous language.
Not reported as “pedestrian
Not reported as “pedestrian collides with bike”?
Alot of the media reports in
Alot of the media reports in the UK and almost always the case in local media thesedays are simply copy & pasted from press releases the police issue,which are themselves sourced from the actual police report of the incidents. which is why they are often filled with statements the police would consider an evidential fact that needed to be noted,rather than a considered representation as news.
Local media then fear changing those statements as they believe doing so could apportion blame to an involved party,this way they can simply say they reported what the police issued,even if it means the language they often resort to, car is alleged to have had cyclist crash into it,makes no sense.
It would be interesting if the researchers in the US had found the same issues in media filtering of police reports
Awavey wrote:
And the rest of their copy is copy/pasted from Twitter, Facebook, and Mumsnet, I’m beginning to think…