Newmen unveils the Streem G.62, a 1,670g, 32-inch aero wheelset… but you can’t buy it yet

@EK Spinner My guess would be because it means you can have a normal length chain. If the rear wheel was 1m further back from the normal position, it would require a chain 2m longer.

@Rendel Harris I'm surprised that they still have site access privileges given the racist comments about an MP the other day

@Rendel Harris what an absurd response. Of course I think of my children's safety. It's not pearl clutching to do that. They are much more vulnerable and less predictable than someone who is experienced at commuting every day. And whataboutery is not a valid argument. Just because something else is also dangerous doesn't negate my point. Your stopping distance is much higher on a heavy cargo bike, you are much less agile. At some point you shouldn't be mixing with vulnerable cyclists and should use the roads. Bike paths are for cyclist, not carrying heavy cargo around. At 15mph 100kg of bricks hitting you is going to do far more damage than a person would. At some point you should be on the roads, not weaving in and around pedestrians and other cyclists.

@markvr Won't somebody please think of the children! If you think about it without pearl clutching histrionics, you are much more likely to be crashed into by someone on a standard bike riding irresponsibly fast or weaving in and out on a cycle path. Because of the nature of cargo bikes and their loads they will be ridden slowly and will not be zipping in and out of the other traffic on a path. My area of London is cargo bike central both for people carrying kids et cetera and for delivery riders and I've yet to have a single incident with a cargo bike, whereas it's an unusual 25 km commute where I won't have to take evasive action against somebody riding a standard bike foolishly or inappropriately for the conditions or cirumstances. I've never even heard of somebody being hit by a cargo bike, I'm sure it must've happened somewhere but seems to be a very rare event. Your kids are far more likely to be in danger from cars and other motor vehicles, even when they are pedestrians on the pavement, than they are from cargo bikes, sensible concern is one thing but baseless paranoia is another.

@EK Spinner they are often used to carry children, which is easier when they are in front.

I don't want people carrying heavy cargo on bikes around me and my kids when we are on cycle paths! There should be a maximum weight allowed for an ebike. All these photos of people showing off about how much they can carry on a cargo bike scare me. What happens if they crash into me or my kids with hundreds of kilos of paint or whatever? At some point it's safer for everyone else for you to be on the roads in an electric van. Bikes are bikes. They shouldn't be used to carry heavy equipment around other cyclists. Your ability to steer and stop is massively reduced when carrying heavy loads and at the point you should be on the roads, not on bike paths.

Moving away from the politics of this, I have asked a question a few times about cargo bikes and never really had an answer. I should highlight I have never used a cargo bike and I am unlikely to ever have a need to either. My question is this, Why do so many cargo bikes but the cargo at the front and the rider at the back, the riders view can be restricted by the load and the long front introduces avoidable visibility restrictions when emerging from junctions. Is there another advantage to this layout that I am not seeing other than being able to see the cargo load.

I don't know what others think but I thought it was a mistake to cancel the event. I live in one of the areas they cycle though and it didn't seem to bad. Even the few accounts I have watched didn't show cancelling weather, waiting under a tree maybe.

@chrisonabike exactly, words are cheap. They can safely bang the drum knowing that little will or can be done. OK, some things could be done, but the chance of nobody cocking something up . . ? Realist or pessimist, take your pick; but still optimistic enough to hope that things will work out :-)

@ChrisA isn't this story more along the lines of "tobacco company is demanding government crackdown on nasty rolling papers and dangerous pipes?" Silly of me! How could there be any conflict between and "improving things for their ... definitely not employees ... and the public at large" and these companies' entire business model...?