Two more helmetless posties face sack

MPs call for a 'more sensible' approach

by Tom Henry   July 8, 2009  

postie.jpg

Two more postal workers in the North West of England are facing the sack for failing to wear cycling helmets, prompting a plea for ‘common sense’ by regional MPs.

The two postmen, based in Garstang and Lytham, are apparently under investigation for not complying with Royal Mail requirements that all cycling postal workers must wear a helmet.

Last week, road.cc reported on the cases of three postal workers from Southport who were investigated and sacked by the Royal Mail for not wearing helmets, a move described as ‘draconian’ by the employees’ union.

Royal Mail says it takes employee safety "very seriously" and enforces the use of helmets through "numerous safety briefings and notification documents".

But Chorley MP Lindsay Hoyle, who sits on the House of Commons Business and Enterprise Select Committee which investigates Royal Mail matters, has called for a more sensible approach.

He said: "I think people need to look at terms and conditions and if Royal Mail is serious about this one, a warning is the way forward. I think to sack somebody is severe, common sense should prevail.

"Royal Mail has a duty to look after its employees but it needs to make sure people understand their policy and the way forward is to proceed in a sensible manner."

Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans added: "It does seem very heavy-handed as it's not usually compulsory for cyclists to wear helmets on bicycles.

"I can understand why it is done from an insurance point of view but perhaps putting them on a training course and showing them the effects of not wearing helmets would be far better than dismissing them."

Royal Mail said cycle helmets have been supplied as "personal protective equipment" since 2003 "in the same way as high visibility jackets and protective shoes are issued to staff to help ensure their safety".

In a statement, the Royal Mail said: "Staff are made aware of the requirement to wear cycle helmets when using a bike.

"We do not talk about individual personnel issues but I can state that Royal Mail takes the safety of its employees very seriously which is why it is mandatory for all Royal Mail staff who use a bike to wear personal protective equipment, including cycle helmets."

The CTC has campaigned against the compulsory wearing of helmets and in the past has published an open letter of support to postal workers who do not agree with Royal Mail’s rules.

 

2 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Interesting that the CTC would campaign against the use of something which is undoubtedly in the safety interests of its members. In the past they have gone on strike, or threatened to do so, over any number of things which contribute to the overall safety of its members. Perhaps they're just peeved they didn't get to use the helmet issue for wage negotiation leverage. Makes you wonder whose interests they're really supporting.
On the other hand, it would seem somewhat brutal to sack the offenders without a warning. Or were they warned?

posted by mariocipollini [2 posts]
9th July 2009 - 12:55

like this
Like (2)

All the meaningful evidence on the subject seems to suggest that there is a great deal of doubt as to whether helmets are "in the safety interests of its members" hence the CTC's position

Denzil Dexter's picture

posted by Denzil Dexter [140 posts]
9th July 2009 - 18:29

like this
Like (2)