Cervélo have gone live with then new P4, launching at Interbike this week. It’s a big job to improve on the all-conquering P3, so what’s new? well, the rear brake is completely integrated into the frame, there’s a 570ml integrated hydration bottle that sits on the bottom braket, there’s no front wheel cutout (Cervélo claiming that it doesn’t really work) and of course there’s the usual refinements to the aero shape. The frame will have a £3199.99 price tag and stock should be in early in the new year. More details are at http://www.cervelo.com/bikes.aspx?bike=P42009 and there are even more pictures in our Interbike 2 gallery , particularly recommended for those who like their bikes behind really shiny plexiglass
NEW Cervélo P4 – first pics!
New Cervelo P4 launched at Interbike
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Dave is a founding father of road.cc, having previously worked on Cycling Plus and What Mountain Bike magazines back in the day. He also writes about e-bikes for our sister publication ebiketips. He’s won three mountain bike bog snorkelling World Championships, and races at the back of the third cats.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
belugabob 7 minutes ago
@chrisonabike - I agree, but my point was more about the reluctance/pushback involved, rather than the effectiveness/safety of any schemes that are/might be rolled out
chrisonabike 9 minutes ago
Trams would be great! Wonder what happened to them...
Robert Hardy 17 minutes ago
Serious injuries as defined in statistics span from an uncomplicated fracture of a forearm bone to catastrophic multiple injuries that result in death in subsequent weeks and months. Consequently without further analysis they may be quite misleading, it may be that the statistics disguise what would otherwise have been fatal injuries at the roadside due to effective early treatment by first responders and subsequent trauma care OR that they reflect an increase in injuries at the lower edge of the severity spectrum OR neither. From the numbers alone we do not know and so are not in a good position to draw inferences about the seeming fall in deaths and rise in reported serious injuries.
yodhrin 19 minutes ago
@chrisonabike The intense resistance Network Rail seem to put up against absolutely any infrastructure project near the railways that would lead to more passengers on the railways is perpetually baffling to me.
yodhrin 25 minutes ago
@jackcycles Sorry Vincent, but your legacy will be to be remembered as a grumpy failure and pub bore, who twists facts to suit narratives and has never knowingly been correct about anything in his miserable life.
Didsbury 1 hour ago
@mdavidford Surely we have been Norman since 1066?
Didsbury 1 hour ago
@mdavidford Surely we have been Norman since 1066?
chrisonabike 1 hour ago
@belugabob true, but doing that and persuading most parents to drive their children to school entailed a hefty sacrifice of children - and not a few parents. (Luckily that was "back then" and we probably wouldn't tolerate it now... OTOH while "fixing things" should have much smaller casualty numbers, "during the transition" it could well increase...)
belugabob 2 hours ago
Well, accommodating the motor vehicle required "transformation of streets", so we've proved that it's possible...🙄
Circles 2 hours ago
Yet another case of planning agreements made but never fulfilled, nor checked by the LA. Developers can do what they want, it seems