Home
New bike features aerodynamic integration and vibration cancelling technology

Bianchi are launching a new time trial bike, the Aquila CV, that uses Countervail vibration cancelling technology. The bike was raced for the first time on Saturday by Team Belkin’s Bauke Mollema and Laurens Ten Dam in the Tour de France’s Stage 20 time trial.

We’ll come back to the Countervail technology in a mo. Bianchi’s main goal here was to produce a bike with minimal drag. They’ve sought to do this by developing an aerodynamically efficient frame and fork and integrating the components; there are no exposed bolts/fasteners and very little exposed cabling to disturb the airflow.

The high-modulus carbon monocoque frame uses NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) aerodynamic tube profiles. Many brands truncate the tube profiles – they effectively get rid of the long, tapering trailing edges and chop them off square instead, the idea being that you get virtually the same aero benefit with less material. Bianchi haven’t done this; they’ve kept the trailing edges in place.

Bianchi say that the Aquila CV has been designed using CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulation software and pro athlete feedback, and developed and tested in the wind tunnel – which is the usual way of doing things these days.

They say that the front of the frame, fork and bars are the most important profiles when it comes to minimising drag because these are the first areas to encounter undisturbed air. For that reason, they focused their efforts in component design and aero integration here.

Bianchi have engineered a customised cover, made from carbon fibre, that sits in front of the head tube and front V-brake system.

The rear V-brake is positioned behind the bottom-bracket to minimise the aerodynamic drag.

Like the frame tubes, the Bianchi-designed handlebar/stem, made by FSA, is NACA airfoil shaped. It is 41cm wide and is integrated into the rest of the front-end design. All the cables run inside the handlebar so that they can’t disturb the airflow. The stem is available in three different lengths: 90mm 110mm and 130mm.

The Aquila CV comes with adjustable rear dropouts so you can fine tune the distance between the rear wheel and the seat tube to reduce turbulence, and it has a steep seat tube angle of 76.5° to help you get into an aerodynamically efficient ride position. The aluminium seatpost clamp comes with two different positions with +/- 18mm setback so you can get the setup you want.

The full carbon fork comes with a standard 1 1/8in steerer and straight, bladed legs.

Interestingly, Bianchi say that even the paint they’ve used is specifically designed to reduce drag. The surface of it is such that they can't use their normal graphics, they’ve had to get new ones made up.

What about the Countervail technology, then? Well, that’s something that Bianchi first introduced last year on the Infinito CV (which we made road.cc Bike of the Year). Bianchi collaborated with Materials Sciences Corporation to come up with a material that reduces road vibration. It’s all a bit Secret Squirrel but Bianchi have exclusive use of Countervail in the cycling industry.

 

“With the patented carbon fibre architecture and viscoelastic material, Countervail carbon material, embedded within the Aquila CV carbon frame and fork, immediately cancels vibration while increasing the stiffness and strength of the entire frame/fork system,” say Bianchi.

They list these benefits (these are Bianchi’s own words):
• Maximised ride control and handling, allowing the rider sustained best aero position in varied road conditions.
• Reduced muscle fatigue, in particular the neck, shoulders and lower back empowering leg strength and increasing overall duration.
• Increased energy savings, improve the rider’s overall performance.
• Increased rigidity and peak power output over long distances.

For statistic fans, Bianchi claim that the Countervail tech provides “75% increased vibration cancelling capacity”.

 

We’ve not ridden the Aquila but we were certainly massively impressed by the Infinito CV, so we’ll keep our fingers crossed that the Aquila is equally good.

The Aquila is compatible with both mechanical and electronic groupsets and is available in four sizes: XS, S, M and L. Bianchi give a frame weight of 1.3kg.

The bikes the pros use are never cheap, of course. The Aquila frameset – including the full-carbon fork, TRP TTV RCR brakes, the FSA Bianchi aero carbon stem/bar, and Bianchi’s aero carbon seatpost – is priced at £4,500.

The Aquila CV is available in two complete builds. If you go for the model with a Shimano Ultegra mechanical groupset and Fulcrum Racing Quattro clinchers, that’ll cost you £5,000.

The top-end model comes with a Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 groupset and Fulcrum Red Wind XLR 80mm-deep wheels. That one is priced at £8,900. The first ones will arrive in the UK later in the year, possibly in September.

Mat has worked for loads of bike magazines over the past 20 years, and been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. He's been road.cc technical editor for seven years, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a past winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer.

10 comments

Avatar
truffy [653 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Can it be fitted with mudguards? A pannier would be a nice addition too.

In all seriousness, though, how much difference does all the aero tech make when you stick a human being on top, albeit one with a funny-shaped helmet?

Avatar
njmoffat [36 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Aerodynamics make a huge difference. If you add up the frame, wheels, handlebars, position, skinsuit, helmet, shoe covers etc. - quite literally the difference between winning and losing. So yes it matters.

Avatar
RobD [293 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Not sure it helped Mollema and Ten Dam that much on Saturday, they seemed to really struggle, or is it that this is such a comfortable TT bike that they just relaxed and started to drift off? either way it goes to show that it's only as fast as the engine pushing it, judging by that, I think Tony Martin could have won on a boris bike the power he was pushing.

Avatar
Paul J [908 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I thought non-structural fairings were illegal under UCI rules?

Avatar
glynr36 [637 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
truffy wrote:

Can it be fitted with mudguards? A pannier would be a nice addition too.

In all seriousness, though, how much difference does all the aero tech make when you stick a human being on top, albeit one with a funny-shaped helmet?

http://cyclingtips.com.au/2010/04/biggest-bang-for-your-buck-in-time-tri...

Add it all up, yes that shows the rider based stuff makes a huge difference, but take away the aero bike and wheels and Tony Martin would have come 6th on Stage 20.

Avatar
glynr36 [637 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Paul J wrote:

I thought non-structural fairings were illegal under UCI rules?

I think they changed the rules and they have to fit in a 'box' they have, as the Pinarello Bolide has similar covers

Avatar
pedalpowerDC [343 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

 41 I applaud the theory that Ten Dam and Mollema were just so darn comfortable that they forgot to put the power down.  24

That gives credence to UCI's fitting regs that force the riders to be in pain for the whole TT.

Avatar
Husain [4 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
truffy wrote:

In all seriousness, though, how much difference does all the aero tech make when you stick a human being on top, albeit one with a funny-shaped helmet?

I can easily average 5kph higher on a TT bike compared to a round-tube road bike over a distance of 100 km. It feels like having a leadout train - all the time. But I prefer the road bike: safer on open roads, more comfortable, and one could hold a conversation out of the foetal position.

Avatar
truffy [653 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Husain wrote:

I can easily average 5kph higher on a TT bike compared to a round-tube road bike over a distance of 100 km.

OK, that's a good answer. Despite the responses above, I do understand the concepts of aerodynamics, but no one's put it into context until now.

Avatar
Stanley [39 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Bring it up north. Us lads will take it for a spin past to compos chippy in holmfirth. If it gets nicked its a decent bike. We only have posh thieves up here.

Once you take it up here, after a bag of chips and three pints of pale ale, you might as well be on a penny farthing. Complete waste of money. Money better spent on a cortina and three weeks in benidorm.

Stay happy, ride safe, sleep well and eat proper foods not those stupid gels and salt drinks.