John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
6 comments
So the _small_ amount of abuse is enough to penalise all cyclists? Sounds a bit like "we thought we could get away with this nod to cycling, but we didn't realise there would be so many cyclists and we want to make more money."
There's a lot of people that'll happily cycle three to five miles that won't consider 7-10 for a commute- especially if the addtional distance is down hostile roads. Cycling from somewhere with no bus service to a P&R site makes a lot of sense for them.
Norwich isn't Cambridge and its park and ride is miles away from the centre along undulating roads with parts not having cycle lanes. Given that the local buses are dominated by First Eastern Counties, I wouldn't be sure the drivers notice anything.
"...what's the point? If you have a bike, why not use it, instead of getting a bus?"
This.
Seriously? This ...
... is the sum total of their evidence about fare abuse?
Have they never heard of folding bikes?
I think it's fair to assume the bus drivers would notice if passengers were bringing significant numbers of folding bikes on. But if it's like Cambridge P&R, what's the point? If you have a bike, why not use it, instead of getting a bus?