Two cyclists from Hampshire who set out last weekend to break the tandem record from Land’s End to John O’Groats may have missed out on that goal after illness struck one of them on the first day of the journey, but they are tought to be the only people to have finished the journey after attempting to better the existing shortest time for the end-to-end ride, set nearly 50 years ago.
Dominic Irvine and Ian Rodd were accompanied on their 832-mile journey by cycling photographer Joolze Dymond, who documented their progress in both still pictures and video as they covered the distance in 58 hours and 56 minutes.
That was more than eight hours outside the record of 50 hours, 14 minutes and 25 seconds set by Pete Swindon and John Withers in 1966, but despite the record being out of sight early on, the pair pushed on to complete the journey, which also aimed to raise funds for The Magic Wand Appeal at NHS Foundation Trust, where Rodd is a consultant paediatrician. Donations can be made via a Just Giving page set up for the ride.
Although the pair missed out on the record, Irvine was upbeat afterwards, clearly taking a lot of satisfaction in having completed the end-to-end ride.
“It’s really great, isn’t it, as an ordinary person, not a superstar, not an Olympian, to take on an extraordinary challenge, and just see if you can do it,” he reflected.
“In all honesty, that’s what it is all about, could I do something going from being a bit of an average cyclist to doing something as extreme as that. That was the goal.”
Rodd, whose previous longest bike ride was 130 miles, said: “I think the lowest point was where I genuinely thought we weren’t going to make it, we were about 400 miles from the end I suppose and I really didn’t think it was possible.
“I had so many people who had put their trust in me and I couldn’t quite work out what to do about that. I got a bit messed up about that, that was quite a downer really.”
Asked at the end of the video, “Do you think this is going to be unfinished business?” Irvine replied with an emphatic “Yes.”
We look forward to the next instalment.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
I would assume that it's the scent of huge profits that pulls in investment that does improve treatments, but we can see the end game of...
I was wondering if other countries used some kind of anti-copying technology. One type would be to use something like an RFID chip embedded into...
Thanks for the info. I still can't find anything on the length of the ban, if he was banned, but I did find this interestng discussion on the...
Doubly galling when, as has been pointed out here in the past, a binary search would efficiently reveal the time of theft. Triply galling when I...
I have the same having got fed up with losing/breaking/scratching £150+ pairs from Oakley and POC, also with constantly having to change lenses...
I lived a fair distance, 40 ish minutes walk, which I did every day. Only one of my house shares had a car and he walked too. Back then 92 to 95...
3 quid from planet X......
The front one seems a bit useless - what is it protecting, if not the feet, chain(wheel) and entire bottom bracket area? I found that "ToeSavers"...
The vision couldn't have been that good ,they went bankrupt.
I disagree, the lucky few who get to wear one of these will certainly produce more mass.