At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I'd say my 'constantly and tediously ranting against them' is a very tiny drop in an ocean of people, brands, marketeers, cycling media etc....
I can see you've had a look at the Inverness Tourist Board Facebook page...
The Police Scotland Digital Evidence Sharing Platform being rolled out will not make it any easier to report incidents, it simply allows an...
Highway Code states: ...
The video is there now
Thank you.
It's great to see this sort of innovation but it's always worth reminding people who say helmets should be mandatory that most cycling fatalities...
I do indeed.
The article states the toerags were youths, so unfortunately there probably won't be any real punishment. But at least the police are appealing for...
Residents awoken by car crashing into Almshouse garden...