Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
It's interesting (as a pattern)....
I like their stuff. And the better half seems to think it's suitable for pressies, last b'day was a super light ss jersey, and it's lovely. Wearing...
£33 million???
And yet regardless of that engineering point, it would still be more room than the majority of motorists give cyclists....
I can foresee Kask's PR department getting busy in response to this....
So it was a gang dispute not an attack on (e)bikers.
Can we agree that a manufacturer refusing to sell you a component if your bike isn't good enough means we've finally reached peak bike snobbery? ;¬...
Possibly. The one-way charge was only about £80 on top of the normal charges, which is a lot less than I've come across in the US for an equivalent...
That's my cue, I believe......
Came to this late; nearly posted the same!