Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Yellow-themed carbon fibre factory owned by Greg LeMond heading for Grimsby, and could create 400 jobs

Three-time Tour de France winner's carbon fibre manufacturing company to create up to 400 jobs with major factory producing the material for engineering and other non-cycling industries...

In what's been described as "a massive capital investment" that could create up to 400 jobs in Grimsby, Greg LeMond's carbon fibre-manufacturing company has had planning permission approved for the construction of a giant new factory.

LeMond Carbon, founded by the three-time Tour de France winner, has "applied its carbon fibre expertise in high-performance cycling to other fields, notably the manufacture of wind turbine blades and pressure vessels for hydrogen storage".

Now, the company has received planning permission to construct "a new, state-of-the-art carbon fibre-manufacturing plant" at Energy Park Way in Grimsby, with the BBC also reporting that outline planning permission has also been granted for a second production line at the site.

The facility will consist of a 306-metre-long manufacturing building, a cooling compound and two-storey offices. The design features yellow details, a nod to LeMond's racing career when he won the Tour de France three times, most famously in 1989 by just eight seconds from Laurent Fignon, the men's race's closest ever finish.

The new factory is expected to create up to 400 jobs by 2030, North East Lincolnshire Council leader Philip Jackson celebrating the "massive capital investment" and creation of "new, well-paid jobs", as well as "many additional supporting roles in the local economy".

"The innovative manufacturing of carbon fibre in Grimsby is very welcome and shows that the chemical sector continues to thrive in our area, adding to the diversification of the local economy," he said.

Planning consultants DWD worked on behalf of LeMond Carbon UK during the application process and noted that up until now the UK has been "entirely dependent upon imported carbon fibre", a material that while also used for bicycle frames and components, is also manufactured for other engineering sectors, such as in the construction of wind turbine blades.

DWD explained: "The UK Government has recognised the need for indigenous supply and has supported LeMond to set up a new facility at Energy Park Way, Grimsby. DWD were instructed in 2024, tasked with obtaining planning permission, which was achieved in January 2025."

LeMond Carbon has been outspoken in its desire to "be the the world's leading supplier of carbon fibre to the renewable energy, transportation, and industrial manufacturing sectors" and a few years ago partnered with Deakin University in Australia on the development of production technology that is said to reduce the cost of production by "30 per cent" and carbon emissions by "50 per cent".

In 2020, LeMond Carbon completed a successful test of its carbon manufacturing process by independent technical auditors Bureau Veritas (BV).

At the time, LeMond said: "This is a significant milestone for our company. Having our technology independently verified by BV validates the revolutionary nature of our technology. My team and I are excited to bring our high-performance low-cost carbon fibre to the global market and look forward to expanding into new markets where the current high cost of carbon fibre has been a significant barrier to adoption."

While it was initially reported that by investing in carbon tech LeMond simply wanted to get a jump on the bike industry and benefit his self-named bike brand, the implications of lower-cost carbon fibre would naturally also appeal to many other industries from aerospace to military and any other sectors that use the material.

"It's kind of a little bit of luck, we were trying to make carbon fibre in Oakridge [Tennessee] to get carbon fibre to our customers, and Dekerk [Buckmaster, director of Carbon Nexus at Deakin University] said 'we've created something that could change the whole industry'," LeMond said back in 2020.

> LeMond is promising "transformative change" to carbon construction with all new 8 road bike

Now, five years on, LeMond Carbon has established the carbon fibre production facility in Tennessee, and the major UK-based factory has also now been approved, construction presumably starting in due course and coming with the promise of 400 new jobs in Grimsby and a "state-of-the-art" facility.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Keesvant | 4 days ago
1 like

Let's hope we find a way to 100% recycle carbon,
All those wind turbine blades go landfill now.
(Next to the solar panals)

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Keesvant | 4 days ago
1 like

Not so much any more - a lot of them are starting to be ground up for reuse in cement, flooring, and other industrial products (as well as things like bike sheds!).

And methods for breaking them down to be fully recyclable are already in development.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 4 days ago
0 likes

I note that the "reuse" is definitely as "downgraded material".  The recycling - may be interesting but we'll have to see.  For example just how energetically disfavourable the recycling is (and what chemicals are needed in the process / byproducts result)?  Will we have to have accellerating "growth" in building new wind turbines to power the recycling of the old ones...?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 4 days ago
1 like

chrisonabike wrote:

I note that the "reuse" is definitely as "downgraded material".

Yes - and leaves open the question of what we do with it when that product's lifespan ends.

Quote:

For example just how energetically disfavourable the recycling is (and what chemicals are needed in the process / byproducts result)?

My understanding is that the latest processes starting to be put into production are relatively low energy, but the chemicals / byproducts question stands.

Of course, it would be better to design in end-of-life considerations from the start*, and again, approaches for that are being explored, though so far they seem a bit less advanced.

[*as well as ideally making them last longer to start with.]

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 4 days ago
0 likes

It's tricky as there are strong efficiency reasons for wind turbines being as large as possible.  As sizes get bigger this does require advanced materials.  (Discussed here).

OTOH there is the usual pressure for "something new".  And as ever "more energy".  It's a simplification but it's rather like once it was clear wind power could work and indeed scale a bit there has been pressure for "as much of it as possible".  Wind seems the easier path with relatively low cost, opposition and short timescales" (compared to nuclear, large scale hydro etc.)

So a lot of the "we have to switch away from fossil fuels" now turns to how we pick up that demand via wind turbines - as opposed to "can we keep a lid on - or even reduce - the amount we actually use"?

I guess it's a bit like driving vs. active travel.  With the former governments need to deal with relatively few large corporations (and giant sums of money are generated).  The latter is more about "savings" and involves lots of small, local behaviour changes.

There has been a some work done on the efficiency side of energy use (particularly in some industrial sectors).  But the idea of just ... using less?  That doesn't seem to be seen as possible (or even desirable).  There's certainly less news/money in "we could make hay while the sun shines (rather than at night, or during the winter)".  Or "we could do less space heating and wear more jumpers / use hot water bottles a bit more".

It seems that side of human ingenuity only appears when e.g. a neighbour invades and blows up all the power and switching plant.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 3 days ago
1 like

The biggest mindset problem there is the idea that it has to be one vs the other. In reality, if we want to dig ourselves out of the hole, we need to be limiting usage and investing in wind and in other renewables and in other stuff (storage, for example) and...

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 3 days ago
0 likes

True ... but left to itself that notion tends to go the same way as instructing pedestrians, cyclists and SUV drivers to "share the road"!

(Probably I'm complaining that water is wet here.  Humans want to demonstrate their relative status, have drives to "make things better" / "improve the lot of others", will seek convenience, get bored and want to investigate / play with stuff - or even destroy it.  All seem to feed increased consumption.)

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Keesvant | 4 days ago
0 likes

It's been suggested we're still getting much of the steel we need from fossil-fuel fired furnaces also?  And then there's also cement for the concrete, not a zero emissions process...

(Obviously this is all "better" than using same to build a coal-fired plant - but we also appear keen to use a lot more (electrical) energy, this time in data centres, electric-powered transport, electric heating, electric furnaces in industry...).

Avatar
mdavidford | 5 days ago
2 likes

DWD wrote:

The UK Government has recognised the need for indigenous supply

Sourced from the carbon fibre plants that have flourished in the Grimsby area since the last ice age?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 4 days ago
0 likes

Since (relatively) shortly after the carboniferous!  Or perhaps the mesolithic?

Avatar
Sredlums | 5 days ago
2 likes

He was smart as a rider, and judging from all this, still is smart now. I know some of his earlier bike brand endeavours didn't work out, so I hope this time things will be better for him.

Latest Comments