At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
This would be very important if it didn't look like a false picture. There appear to be 3 chainrings! Can't see a crank break and it just looks...
The problem for me with this layout is where are the junctions? My understanding of rule H2 is that pedestrians do not have priority at the exits...
I suppose journalists can just about be forgiven for not knowing the difference between CdA and Cd but supposed Engineers can't. CdA is NOT the...
There is a pHd student at work who has an Adidas backpack in reflective iridescence, looks oil slicky in the day. I love both oil slick and...
I think what you say has some sense to it (for WBD)....
A generation (or more) of cycling fans owe a huge amount to Gary Imlach and the C4 / ITV teams for their cycling coverage on TV, especially Gary's...
Currently watching the Cyclocross Worlds on www.Sporza.be using my vpn, which I have anyway, free through my bank account. OK, so it's in Dutch,...
An update regarding this path....
Theres no boubt about it, this bloke is the kiss of death
As you agree with me, I don't understand your point.