At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Allegedly a major culprit for the discrepancy is that when the occasional power reading gets dropped, Garmin applies an algorithm based on cadence...
I don't have them to hand but IIRC Dutch cycling figures and some slicing and dicing plus analysis are available. Like our own figures it's worth...
It's not only you. The problem with the sort of rural shared paths as pictured is that dog owners bring their dogs there precisely to be able to...
True. Except that the UberdeliverJust Eat riders *arent* employees. Just independent contractors who happen to be on call to JystDeliverUberEat...
You may not be the first person to have made that joke 😀 (But, yes, she is.)
The cyclops junctions in Cambridge work well. ...
Teen boy arrested after flipping car in countryside near Swindon...
I would be curious to see how these compare to the Elite Wheels lineup. Currently I have some LB wheels but was looking into other options for fun...
McDonald's and an Uber. Sorted.
imagine deciding to put all this energy into trying to shunt a problem around without any prospect of solving it. ...