- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Cross country mountain bikes
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
2 comments
Good lord really? If they are actually assessing him on the evidence the verdict of another body based on that evidence should be irrelevant.
Anyone would think they are reluctant to get to the bottom of this stuff.
On the medical (especially ethics) front, they surely have to defer to the expert opinion of the medical profession?
Honestly, I'd love to know what's really behind all this, because nothing makes any sense here. The stuff we've heard so far just raises questions. The only thing it's strongly suggested is that if Sky were doping, Freeman was kept well away from it.
I half wonder if the real story isn't something as bizarre as providing testosterone to a transgender person who couldn't get treatment on the NHS. The kind of thing that would get Freeman in much bigger trouble if it came out.