- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
20mph sign (CC licensed by EdinburghGreens via Flickr)NICE recommends 20mph limits to improve air quality
20mph limits across urban areas would protect the quality of air and encourage walking and cycling, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
NICE, which reviews evidence on health policies, said “unnecessary acceleration and deceleration” which cause additional emissions.
It advises authorities to set “20 mph limits without physical measures to reduce speeds in urban areas where average speeds are already low (below around 24 mph) to avoid unnecessary accelerations and decelerations”
20mph limits are increasingly being used in areas including Edinburgh, Glasgow, Hammersmith and Fulham, where councils have justified their wide area 20mph limits both on health grounds from fewer casualties, and due to reduced acceleration and encouraging modal shift away from car use towards non-polluting methods like walking and cycling – which all improve air quality.
NICE added: “Where physical speed reduction measures are used to reduce road danger and injuries, consider using them to encourage drivers to maintain a reduced, steady pace along the whole stretch of road, rather than road humps that may increase acceleration- and braking-related emissions”
Rod King MBE, Founder of 20’s Plenty for Us said: “Many authorities recognise that 20mph helps them to both meet their air quality as well as ‘duty of care’ responsibilities to the vulnerable. In fact switching to a 20mph limit makes a significant reduction in the most dangerous NOx and PM10 emissions.
“It is entirely appropriate for NICE to make this recommendation to direct local authorities in their statutory duty to improve air quality and public health.”
Latest Comments
- David9694 3 sec ago
Impressed that it comes with a lighting kit and pedals. Looks like a non-series chainset and is a Micro shift cassette, though; off-brand callipers...
- chrisonabike 3 min 34 sec ago
There are so many caring - nay selflessly dutiful - people in the world. Just look at all the folks with more than 12 points on their driving...
- Sensible cyclist 5 min 45 sec ago
I am completely fed up with entitled cyclists whinging at every opportunity - it just gives others the opportunity to slag us off. Give it a rest!
- slc 19 min 11 sec ago
They should read scampercraft and not exaggerate the danger of scuttling along. I discourage squirrel predation by acting like one.
- HalfDanHalfBiscuit 28 min 40 sec ago
You can get the Varia for £10 less from Decathlon.
- Geoff H 1 hour 3 min ago
Perhaps they should apply the same standard to dangerous, unsafe, poorly designed roads and COMPLETELY rip them out rather than "fix" or "redesign"...
- Destroyer666 1 hour 25 min ago
Although the article does not make this clear, the Cybertruck reference is not made by Ingrid, but just some person stating their opinion on the...
- wtjs 2 hours 12 min ago
Just like pushing a sore tooth, it's sometimes worth looking at these comments to see just how thick thick people are. Last night on the BBC NW...
- Jules59 2 hours 13 min ago
Comparing road fatalities per 1 billion km driven then Australia has about twice the death rate of the UK....
Add new comment
12 comments
20 MPH speed limits are useless without encforcement.
Cambridge went 20MPH in the city ages ago, and the roads are still used like race tracks.
The Police can't be bothered with doing this stuff directly but it seems that there is a scheme in London for local people to participate in enforcing speed limits...
It is ironic that using 20MPH limits in places often happens in areas where you are lucky if you can even do half that or in locations where sleeping policemen already exists which as most people know are a large cause of extra pollution.
In one local area to me that I pass every other day they recently put a 20 limit along the road as it passes a number of schools which was quite silly since at the time of child pickup and drop off no one gets over 10MPH.
Councils won't even see their way to putting limits in place outside schools, let alone any other pie-in-the-sky stuff.
My observation of living on a 20mph road is precious few worry about the physical measures as it is,as they'll just get a new car on credit in a few years anyway,remove the physical measures completely you might as well set autobahn limits on all roads
Latest department of transport stats show over 80% of observed traffic break the speed limit in 20mph zones, dropping to about 40% for 30mph zones.
People pretty much decide for themselves what speed they want to do, speed limit zones are useless without corresponding enforcement. It'd be far more effective to increase penalties for dangerous or careless driving to improve motoring standards.
If the speed limits are being ignored, then it's not rocket surgery to step up the enforcement. It's not even difficult to set up automatic speed cameras that will provide a nice revenue stream until drivers get it through their heads that they are likely to be caught.
All it need is the political will to allow people to breathe clean air (i.e. not with the Tories in power).
I think you underestimate the gross flaccid uslesness and pure greedy self-interest of the average local government member; they really don't give a flying toss if it doesn't help them personally.
Sounds a good idea to me. They should put 20mph limits on each road that has excessive air pollution in an effort to limit the damage to people. However, that may impact unfairly on electric vehicles that have virtually no emissions whilst driving (obviously pollution is still produced to make their electric power initially).
In related news, car manufacturers (except Tesla) are rallying against China's efforts to curtail vehicle pollution:
https://electrek.co/2017/07/13/automakers-but-tesla-china-slow-down-electric-car-mandate/
Tweaking speed limits isn't really going to help.
Shouldn't they be reducing the number of cars, vans and lorries on those roads if they are serious about wanting to reduce air pollution?
I think the speed limits are to encourage smoother driving, so less acceleration and deceleration which produce proportionally more of the pollutants than driving at a constant speed.
To really tackle air pollution, we should be providing bigger incentives for low pollution transport (e.g. bikes, electric vehicles, public transport) and increasing taxes for worse offenders. (Or follow China's lead with their zero-emission mandate).
The government is not serious about wanting to reduce air pollution.