SpeedX made big news earlier in the year when its Leopard – “the first ever smart aero road bike” – raised over $2 million in pledges on Kickstarter. The higher specced Leopard Pro, fitted with a Shimano Ultegra Di2 groupset and priced at £2,400 (including VAT and duties), has now arrived for testing here at road.cc.
So, what makes the Leopard and the Leopard Pro ’”smart”?
“Leopard is equipped with a head unit using SpeedX’s unique Smart Control system,” says SpeedX. “It provides all the cycling data you need: GPS trajectory, speed, distance, cadence, altitude, calories and weather. It also delivers a visual report with a professional analysis.”
“You can plan your own cycling routes with real-time turn-by-turn navigation using the Smart Control. You can connect to the SpeedX app and easily record, save, share and analyse every detail. You can also join in global online challenges, follow your friends and challenge the leaderboards with our gaming functions.”
The Smart Control head unit (2.4in display, 320x240-pixel resolution) integrates with the stem and is designed to be clearly visible even in direct sunlight. It will track and record data for up to 800km or 40 hours, according to SpeedX.
You can scroll through the data by pushing a button at the top of the fork’s steerer tube, where the headset top cap would usually be.
The Leopard Pro and the Leopard each centre on the same Toray T1000 and T800 carbon-fibre frameset, it’s just the components that differ. The frame is an aero design with a dropped down tube, a seat tube that curves around the leading edge of the rear wheel, and seatstays that join the seat tube very low – all features we’ve come to associate with aero road bikes over the past few years. The V-type front brake sits at the rear of the slim-legged fork and the rear brake is hidden behind the bottom bracket. All of the cables run internally.
SpeedX claims that the Leopard Pro is “probably the stiffest aerodynamic bike frame in the world”, although it doesn’t offer any comparative data to substantiate that. We’ll see if we can dig anything up before we run our review.
SpeedX also claims a frame weight of 1,200g. We’ve not stripped the bike down to check, but we can tell you that the overall weight of our 57cm model is 8.76kg (19.3lb).
Our bike has a seat tube and an effective top tube that are both 570mm, and a 170mm head tube. The chainstays are short at 405mm, and the wheelbase is exactly 1,000mm. The head angle is 73° and the seat angle is 74°.
The stack (the vertical distance from the centre of the bottom bracket to the top of the head tube) is 564mm and the reach (the horizontal distance between those points) is 408mm.
That’s quite an aggressive geometry, which is what you’d probably expect on a bike of this kind. It’s a performance-type machine. Some people might find a taller front end more comfortable, but a higher body position would affect the overall aero efficiency.
Speaking of aero efficiency, SpeedX says, “Together with the Harbin Institute of Technology wind tunnel research team, we performed more than 100 air flow tests in developing the Leopard frame. In this process we found a breakthrough in the airflow over the Leopard design and we call the resulting technology ‘X-Tech’.”
SpeedX doesn’t, though, make any specific aero claims. There’s none of that “it’ll save you X seconds over Y distance” stuff.
The handlebar, stem and 50mm-deep wheels are all SpeedX’s own, as is the seatpost with its integrated rear light.
The Leopard (£1,299) is built up with a mid-level Shimano 105 groupset while the Leopard Pro that we have here has mostly Shimano Ultregra Di2 (electronic) equipment. The shifters, derailleurs, 52/36-tooth chainset and 11-28-tooth cassette are all Ultegra, with the chain coming from KMC.
The other deviation is the brakeset. These are TTV V-type brakes from TRP.
The saddle is a Fizik Arione and the tyres are Vittoria Rubinos. They’re just 23mm wide, which looks really narrow now that most other brands have moved up to at least 25mm. How times have changed!
At first sight, £2,400 looks like a bargain price for a T800/T1000 carbon-fibre aero road bike with a Shimano Ultegra Di2 groupset. Of the bikes that we’ve reviewed here on road.cc recently, the closest to the SpeedX Leopard Pro in terms of price is the Cannondale CAAD12 Disc Dura-Ace at £2,499. As the name informs you, that’s a disc brake bike so it’s not a great comparison, and the frame is aluminium. http://road.cc/content/review/182996-cannondale-caad12-disc-dura-ace It’s built up with the mechanical version of Shimano’s Dura-Ace groupset.
The Merida Scultura 6000 that we reviewed at the start of the year was £2,300. That’s a bike with a carbon-fibre frame designed with some aero features, although you wouldn’t call it an aero road bike. The groupset is Shimano Ultegra (mechanical) based, although there are some other brands chucked into the mix. Stu said that the frameset was “truly stunning”.
Right, let’s get this bad boy set up and out on the road. We’ll be back with a review of the SpeedX Leopard Pro soon.
http://speedx.com/
Add new comment
31 comments
Hello,
When do you anticipate having the review for the SpeedX Leopard Pro posted?
Also, I cannot get an answer from SpeedX regading what positions on the handlebars they are measuring the width from. The 57cm frame is supposed to have a 44cm width which would allow you to figure what position it's measured at?
Hello Everyone,
Is this site not used anymore... no response to below questions over 2 weeks ago?
Posting questions on old news threads is not going to get you a response. No one sees the thread because it is off the front page. Better off reposting your question in the forum.
I can see this as it's the lead story on the comments section on the front page
Why didn't they just make a fancy stem with integrated computer? I might have bought that.
They seem to have reinvented the carbon bike, only a bit heavier.
They have
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/speedforce-the-world-s-smartest-cycli...
Do you guys have the XR4 still?
You could do a shootout riding at particular wattages on these two bikes. That sort of thing always gets a lot of interest
Maybe Bianchi would throw their toys out the pram though..
My Genesis Zero frameset has the same effect on the matt sections and I think it looks nice for what its worth.
Bike looks good, and it'll probably ride well too, but the big manufacturers control the cycling media so it'll get a bad write up. And the snobs won't buy it. With those components, there's no reason it will be a bad bike and with a decent frame warranty it'll be a bargain. Shame about the name though
why are you wasting your time here if that's how it is?
why are you wasting your time here if that's how it is?
Because I'm looking for something new. This is! Because it's the same disirerable bike a lot of people want but a few can afford. Now they can, but like I said, the cycling press will give this bike 3 stars cos blah blah blah.
Anyway dave you are not interested in the article. You just want to attack people for having an opinion
Le troll, douze points!
I'm not aware of Road.cc being owned or sponsored by Giant, Trek, Merida... They could plausibly be independent and have their own opinions too. Having spent a weekend in a garage with Stu I can assure you they are more than capable of free thought, most of which are hilariously entertaining and definitely insightful of the cycling industry.
I refute your claim this is desirable too. I happen to covet metal and unintegrated adaptability.
like i said, why are you here if that's how it is? if i'm just going to give it 3 stars there's no reason for you to read anything i write about it, nor waste your time commenting.
who's attacking who? you're basically saying i'm bent, and i'm in the pocket of the big bike manufacturers, taking their money to mark down rival products. that's not an 'opinion', that's just libel.
I may be mistaken but I don't think that wrinkling effect in the carbon is supposed to be a good thing structurally
You are.
Not unusual..
Oh rats... I now have Tom Jones running around inside my head.
My Merida Reacto 7000 is probably the closest competitor. Aero carbon frame and wheels, with DI2. It doesn't have an integrated computer, but at the same time, it's 500g lighter. Absolutely love my Merida. I've spent the summer on it getting a string of PBs at time trials.
Rear light - battery powered? Rechargeable? Going to be a bitch plugging that into a USB port..
*Whadunk* goes the sound of the ugly stick as it makes contact with the SpeedX Leopard.
//
it's a standard frame with some fairings glued on. Bound to be heavier..
If you turn the brightness up on screen you can see the same effect on most of the photos covering pretty much most of the frame. Terrible finish or maybe just mucky?
Current prices, ie. Hongfu or similar:
Toray 1000 aero frame & post- £400
Aero wheels - £400
Ultegra Di2 - £900
Posh bars and stem - I'm not sure actually. One thing I'm not confident about buying overseas yet, need more feedback.
You can make this bike without the integration if it's inspired you to go rogue.
I'm thinking of going rogue over winter with some chinese carbon. Will probably sticker it up as a raleigh burner just for the wtf factor.
As the leopard. Looks rough and unfinished. I'd not be happy if that was the finished product.
Should have a Chinese frame landing next week. Will stick pics of it up on the forum so you guys can get a look at it. Fingers crossed it's not a mess
I am also curious as i backed the bike - is this finish just horribly bad or something removeable?
Thanks
Are those wrinkles or gouges on the side of the head tube on the penultimate photo?
It's a raw carbon finish. Frames that look neat with a raw carbon finish either have a cosmetic layer of carbon to cover that up, or are hydrodipped (effectively painted) to look like woven carbon fibre
yup, agree with ACM here.
raw carbon is a different aesthetic beast to the pretty weave that is more common. It's not as popular (probably due to the lack of shiny weave) but it saves a little weight
Horses for courses - I really like that look.
Pages