At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Tediously, I never seem to get anywhere.
Inaccurate count of ferrets? They were actually weasels?
Has anyone bought wheels from Light Bicycle? If so what has your experience been?
So you're moaning in your other comments that road.cc didn't provide in-depth coverage of the Nationals and at the same time defending British...
Don't forget sudden concern about people with visual impairments and disabilities - whenever a cycle path is mooted.......
For the Oxford Mail, it's somewhat surprising that the headline wasn't "How can we get rid of cyclists?" in the first place.
I've just taken to shouting (as has my 6 year old cycling next to me) that people need to turn their lights down. The worst is the strobes on dark...
Disappointed with the guardian, tbqh. ...
The problem is a political one rather than technical. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, Transport for London, and the Department...
Hard to know who is up for the TDU and who is putting some miles in their legs... other than sprinters.