- News
- Live blog

“Maybe it’s dropping off it’s little pebbles to rock school”: Dumped building materials block cycle lane, leading people to suggest they “get a wheelbarrow” and move it themselves; Second day of punchy hills await TdF Femmes + more on the live blog

Free Gravel!
Right then, I was very impressed by the geolocation skills of our readership on Tuesday’s live blog in identifying the precise road and coordinates where a tailgating bus driver appeared to spook a cyclist towards riding right by the kerb.
How about this effort though, published in one of the last vestiges of a sane Facebook, the public group ‘Why don’t they ride in the bike lane?’
The page is Australian-focused with the occasional interloping post from an American. But then this post seemed to appear. And Andrew Willis has a very good answer to the group’s key question…
“Because there’s aren’t just parked cars but building materials stored in it
“

We’re no stranger to the blocked cycle lane, by car or by bad planning or just plain car-brain.
Thankfully, in the safe space of the this Facebook page, there’s a good mix of serious and silly posting…
“What an absolutely stupid place to dump it. Not only is it in the way but the local kids and yobs are going to love that as well. Ammo to throw at passing cars and cyclists that now have to swerve out into the road to avoid it. The thicko that tipped it there should be made to come back and pick it up. Stone by stone.”
“Looks like free stone”
“Get a wheelbarrow and borrow some for the muddy trails.”
“BMX and Mountain Bikers are laughing at townie road bike riders on this on. That’s called a ramp”
“I can just hear all the car drivers, why can’t they just jump over it ![]()
![]()
“
“In my view the cars ahead should get TWO TICKETS EACH. they are blocking the bike lane, and they also are blocking the footpath/sidewalk. One could also say they illegally DROVE ON THE SIDEWALK because that’s where they ended up.”
But our personal favourite, by some distance comes from Louis:
“Its a picture, so maybe we don’t see that the rock pile has its blinking lights on… you know… it’s dumped there just for 5 minutes.. maybe it’s dropping off it’s little pebbles to rock school.”
Someone call Jack Black. In the meantime our original poster has set his location to Canterbury, so there’s your first (and only) clue…
'Jonas Vingegaard' back in training
As convincing as the aero helmet, vest and unsureness at riding no-handed are, I think the Colnago gives it away. We wouldn’t dream of seeing him on Pogacar’s bike…
Forest to offer e-bike insurance... apparently
This was quite a frustrating article to get over the line, not least because Forest refused to answer any of our questions about what (or who) their insurance would actually cover.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
It’s 2026, a quarter century through the 21st century! How much more antiquated BS are we going to put up with? - Equality is non negotiable! Equal pay, equal coverage, equal rights. Hello! Whatever happened to so-called European civilisation?
I'm trying to think of an n-th degree silly response to this. Given the issue is pollution by motorists, why punish people who are walking/cycling by banning THEM...? One answer might be to install clear plastic barriers along the edge of the road, which we saw in 2020 to try to prevent the spread of covid, thus keeping the offending fumes away from the path...
Aren't people inside cars at a higher risk? As they are right in the pollution not next to it, and it gets trapped inside their vehicle so they are breathing it in over and over
Why is the starting point ten months for killing someone? Why do we have people who have already shown themselves to be a danger, roaming about with dangerous weapons?
Just thinking about the terms "careless driving" and and the high threshold to meet the charge or be convicted of "dangerous driving". And I thought about how this might apply during a driving test... With the terms "minor fault" and "dangerous fault". Given a single dangerous fault on a test would mean a fail and pretty much any incident where a driver is charged with "careless" driving would meet that standard, should they face an immediate ban and be required to take an extended re-test? Maybe also theory and hazard perception tests too? https://www.gov.uk/driving-test/driving-test-faults-result
My little Renault Zoe has (22 plate), and it is very useful.
@jackcycles Thank you for this. Very sad as you say. It will be interesting to see whether the driver is eventually charged with dangerous driving or they accept a guilty plea for careless driving. Also one for Mitsky. Surely it should either be Nissan and bicycle or Nissan driver and a cyclist.
More info here on how this works: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b4ya3V-s4I0&t=603
@ceebee247 yup, they'd need both a top- down redirection and a training / culture shift, even though presumably they are required to be aware of the appropriate guidance (and in the UK it is just "guidance"). It only works differently elsewhere (eg. NL) because of *both* accepted norms and a legal feedback route (build dangerous / inaccessible stuff or go against certain "environmental regulations" and you may have to defend your choice in court).
Exactly the stunt Shimano pulled when they belatedly went from 10 speed to 11 speed, creating instant redundancy for everyone who had 10 speed wheels and wanted to upgrade. They never even offered a freehub to retrofit older wheels. It’s either deliberate planned obsolescence or reflects a chaotic design philosophy.
