Welcome to Thursday’s live blog, with Jack Sexty, Alex Bowden and the rest of the team.

Counting up London’s ‘no cycling’ signs; Dirty Sanchez star completes 10 Ironman triathlons in ten days; Dylan Teuns suffers bizarre gardening accident; Cyclists burn 40 Cream Eggs a day at the Tour de France + more in today’s Live Blog
SUMMARY

Idiot calls for cyclist's road tax, idiot gets lots of funny replies
We don’t want to give this cretin any more publicity than is necessary, but here’s a selection of the best replies…
Hey, Bob. Sign this ya massive nugget. https://t.co/kuvSELoKLp pic.twitter.com/edgor5JwCh
— Martin Porter (@TheCyclingScot) 31 July 2019
1) Road tax no longer exists. 2) Vehicle Excise Duty goes into general gov. money pot – not towards road maintenance. 3) Drivers of electric/low emission cars are exempt from VED like cyclists – should they be subjected to your tax? I look forward to your response.
— Phil Bovey (@PhillyBillyB) 31 July 2019
Electric cars are not “exempt” from VED, they are subject but pay £0. Important distinction as admin of VED costs £3.75 per vehicle per year. So if cyclists did become subject like electric cars it would cost an additional £150m per year for the Government to collect the extra £0
— ReCycledParent (@re_parent) 31 July 2019
I’m fine with paying £20 if drivers pay for road wear proportionally. Road wear is a function of the 4th power of mass. For a 1.7 ton car, that’s £1.6 million if me + bike+ luggage is 100kg
— Nick Cumming (@nickcumming) 31 July 2019
So you propose cyclists, who already pay for the roads through income and council tax, who don’t pollute, don’t kill hundreds of people per year and don’t cause potholes, pay extra on top of their current contributions, in order to fix potholes that motor vehicles create?
— Aleks Ivanov (@Dehibernate) July 31, 2019
Will my 4yr old daughter need one for her bike? Ps how do I claim back 20 yrs of taxes paid? Seeing as I don’t pay them, I’d quite like £000’s back. I’d love a new bike.
— Howard Crompton (@CromptonHoward) July 31, 2019
19 vegan sausage rolls, 40 cream eggs or 132 Jaffa Cakes: calories burned per day at the Tour de France
On average, Tour de France cyclists burn 6071 calories a day. To compensate for that energy loss, they could eat 19 Greggs vegan sausage rolls, 32 jam donuts, 40 Cadbury Creme Eggs, 132 Jaffa Cakes, 243 carrots or 759 Brussels sprouts.
— Quite Interesting (@qikipedia) 31 July 2019
Alex Dowsett calls for a revamp of his team’s nutritional strategy based of these calculations…
Yet none of this was on the menu, 40 Cadbury Creme eggs, https://t.co/oh6d21R6XL
— Alex Dowsett (@alexdowsett) July 31, 2019
Dylan Teuns won't be racing in San Sebastien due to a bizarre gardening accident involving a lawn tractor


In a development straight out of a certain spoof music-themed movie from the 80’s (although thankfully this one wasn’t fatal), the Bahrain-Merida rider is unable to race the San Sebastien Clasica due to a “minor home accident” caused by a lawn tractor. In a statement, Bahrain-Merida said: “The unfortunate event happened to the Team Bahrain Merida rider while gardening with his garden tractor this morning at his house in Halen.
Dylan suffered a facial wound, that required 15 stitches in his forehead. Due to this and a bashed up face, unfortunately, he will miss the upcoming ‘Clasica San Sebastian’. All of us at Team Bahrain Merida wish him a speedy recovery!”
Let’s hope none of the other members of the team spontaneously combust, choke on someone else’s vomit or are eaten by a pet python during the rest of their race preparations…
Government stats show more cycle investment is needed says road safety charity
Yesterday we reported on government figures that reveal there has been no growth in the number of trips being made by bicycle. In fact, since 2002, the number of trips being made has fallen by five per cent.
Joshua Harris director of Road safety charity Brake told the London Evening Standard that the results indicate more funding is needed.
“These findings reveal that most adults just don’t think it’s safe to cycle on our roads and more is clearly needed to be done to convince them otherwise.
“Whilst the Government’s actions to encourage more people to cycle and keep them safe are welcome, they must go further.
“We need slower, safer speed limits, greater investment in segregated cycle lanes and drivers who behave dangerously removed from our roads.”
Campaigners call for new commissioner to tackle 'woefully underfunded' active travel in North of Tyne region
North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll has told Chronicle Live that he’s working to create a post of walking and cycling commissioner.
Driscoll has no transport powers, but campaigners say a commissioner could lobby for new, high-quality transport options to help people switch from cars.
“Sustainable transport is key priority for me and we’re already working on it,” said Driscoll. “I have met with Chris Boardman and looked at the work they’re doing in Manchester. I’m working with Sustrans, the sustainable travel organisation based in Newcastle, and with colleagues across the region to help us develop a really effective policy that is sustainable for the North of Tyne.
“An Active Travel Commissioner is one of the areas we will be exploring. The benefits of walking and cycling are obvious in terms of climate change, tackling obesity, general health and quality of life. As a keen cyclist myself, I am always happy to meet directly with groups to discuss ways we can work at a community level as well as supporting high profile events such as the Tour of Britain to promote healthy travel.”
Lyft halting San Francisco e-bike scheme after two bikes caught fire
Last week we reported how a dockless Lime e-bike caught fire while someone was riding it in New York. The firm claimed that the incident came about because someone had tried to tamper with the lock.
It’s now being reported that Lyft is to halt its e-bike hire scheme in San Francisco after two of its bikes caught ablaze.
“Out of an abundance of caution, we are temporarily making the ebike fleet unavailable to riders while we investigate and update our battery technology,” said a spokesperson. Full story over on eBikeTips.
BREAKING: @LYFT e-bike battery catches fire in #SanFrancisco
Reported first by @SFExaminer. https://t.co/Zk5T0mCD9q pic.twitter.com/3SBj19qk2X
— Joe Fitz Rodriguez (@FitzTheReporter) July 31, 2019
The new Cervelo Aspero rolls in for testing


Unfortunately for road.cc staffers the off.road.cc gang have bagsied this one, and you can read all about the juicy tech details over on off.road.cc right now.
Deceuninck Quick-Step release epic video recapping their hugely successful 2019 Tour de France
Three stage wins, and a certain Frenchman keeping hold of the yellow jersey for 14 days in total and subsequently making the entire Tour equals a very memorable three weeks for Quick-Step, and now they’ve packaged it all in video form for your enjoyment.
Remember Pritchard off of Dirty Sanchez? He's just completed a continuous Deca triathlon, or ten Ironmans in ten days...
For those who don’t recall, Dirty Sanchez was a mid-2000’s ‘stunt show’ set in the valleys in which the subjects harm themselves in various ways and film the evidence – a Welsh Jackass, if you will.
About five years ago, one of the stars of the show Matthew Pritchard had an epiphany after struggling with alcohol addiction and mental health issues, subsequently going vegan and even bagging his own vegan cooking show on the BBC. He also got well into fitness, and started doing ultra-endurance triathlon and cycling events.
His gluttony for punishment ramped up to another level recently as he lined up for Deca UK, competing in the continuous event where participants have to complete ten Ironmans, with the clock running continuously. Pritchard finished in 248 hours, 42 minutes and 30 seconds yesterday evening, swimming 24 miles, cycling 1,120 miles and rounding off with a 262 mile run.
The event was won by Mark Dodgson, who finished in a mere 235 hours, 20 minutes and 12 seconds.
Comedy Central commissions "non-scripted entertainment series" hosted by Bradley Wiggins
Gods of the Game will see contestants up against well-known British athletes in various sporting challenges.
Bob's 'road tax for cyclists' petition's being checked to see if it meets standards
Looks like Bob’s petition has been pulled by https://t.co/eQE2QZy6o2. It was going so well too! Had over 4 signatures! https://t.co/T27Qvp3b4A
— Elisabeth Anderson (@velobetty) August 1, 2019
There’ll be five angry signatories if they do decide to pull it…
"We're going to have some questions about leadership" says Geraint Thomas about prospect of lining up at next year’s Tour alongside Chris Froome and Egan Bernal
Ineos could field three different Tour-winners at next year’s race.
A fine use of resources
“NO CYCLING” Signs.
There are 12,240 across London – over half of them thanks to Wandsworth Council @wandbc which has them on every ***king lampost. pic.twitter.com/oyTUnFN1kM— always last (@lastnotlost) August 1, 2019
Apparently Wandsworth Council lead the way with erecting ‘no cycling’ signs, with an astonishing 6,996 across the borough. Are there any bare lamposts left?
Today's #ImOldEnoughToRememberWhen hashtag - a great excuse to post random vintage bikes
#ImOldEnoughToRememberWhen banana seats ruled. pic.twitter.com/f0JmNOIZdw
— T-Dub (@Norseman86) August 1, 2019
What’s your fondest bike-related memory of yesteryear?
Hereford council to remove unauthorised 30mph road markings because they might distract drivers
Whitecross Road is notorious for speeding.
Driver who filmed crash acquitted because he wasn’t 'using' mobile as an 'interactive communication device'
In August 2017, Ramsey Barreto filmed the aftermath of a road traffic collision on his phone as he drove past. A police officer spotted him and pulled him over.
The BBC reports that he was charged with ‘driving a motor vehicle while using a hand-held mobile telephone.’ This seems fair enough – except that Barreto then successfully appealed, arguing that “he wasn’t using it to communicate”.
The regulations refer to using, ‘a hand-held mobile telephone or other hand-held interactive communication device,’ and the judges decided that the inclusion of the word ‘other’ works to confine the meaning of ‘using’ to phones being used ‘for an interactive communication’ function.
This is clearly a massive nonsense. Not only is using a mobile phone to film something while driving incredibly dangerous, it also creates a host of other bizarre distinctions.
Writing in The Spectator, Matthew Scott points out that it means that operating a phone to play recorded music is not ‘using’ a phone, whereas doing so to stream music probably is.
Emma Patterson, whose law firm took up Barreto’s case, points out that a driver filming using their phone could still be prosecuted for driving without due care or dangerous driving.
“We think the law will change very quickly,” she said. “In the meantime it’s very likely that police officers that pull you over for fiddling with mobiles are more likely to charge you for driving without due care.”
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
7 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Chris RideFar I think what you meant to say was "REMOVE this and put it on PODCAST CC".
As Mary Whitehouse never said - one doesn't have to read the article if one doesn't want to read about an off-road bicycle.
@FionaJJ In London they're allowed to stop on single and double yellows to deliver packages or empty pillar boxes; in practice they take this as carte blanche to park wherever and whenever they want, such as this chap on the Brixton Road who pulled into the bus/cycle/motorcycle lane without indicating, as I approached at 20mph, to park on a red route, response to a remonstrance, "I suppose you never get post delivered do ya?"
@Rendel Harris We have a pavement parking ban, but around here at least, royal mail vans are already exempt, subject to certain caveats, such as allowing at least 1.5m, and only being stopped to do their work.
It was already embarrassing for the police that they made such a mess of their attempt to determine whether a bike was legal or not, but I had assumed it was a group of well intentioned, but under-trained officers acting on their own initiative, having spotted something they thought looked not quite right. I'm now discovering this was a planned activity, something sufficiently organised to have been given a name - Operation FRISLEN, designed specifically to identify and remove illegal e-bikes and scooters. It's apparent that the officers were sent out without adequate training, never mind the kind of equipment that should be used for this sort of work. I'm not saying they always need specialist equipment to spot all illegal bikes, but at least if they'd been given a demonstration with that equipment, they'd have realised why their approach was not going to end well.
Have put drop bars on a 2001 B1 mtb, a 2007 stumpy hardtail and a 2010 stumpy full suss. In all cases fairly basic conversións leaving gearing and wheels broadly the same and concentrating on correct positioning of bars and fit. Oddly, with all 3 I was happy with the result when recently done, but after a few months found that the extra speed on easy trails was more than offset by the lack of ability (probably mine) on tougher routes and finally preferred flat bar with slammed and inverted stem as best overall compromise. Good fun playing around, though.
The photos in this review look they are for a different bag?
This is a strange reactionary knee jerk overall. But what is this "are essentially motorbikes in disguise" waffle? "One letter claimed that high-powered electric ‘e-bikes’ were “essentially motorbikes” in disguise, with many being used without lights, helmets, or any hi-vis clothing." Surely, they simply ARE motorbikes?
I only watched the last one, that's enough for me! A punishment pass and a clueless passenger. Did you op snap that one?
I don't love the motorway comment. What if they're miles from a motorway? The get in the cycle lane comment is born out of ignorance from people who never cycle. I would just tell them the reason: It's full of broken glass, wet leaves, etc. I'm turning right. I'd have to keep stopping and then rejoining the road. I'd have to keep giving way. It's full of pedestrians. Etc. Or simply ask if they have tried it and leave it at that.
7 thoughts on “Counting up London’s ‘no cycling’ signs; Dirty Sanchez star completes 10 Ironman triathlons in ten days; Dylan Teuns suffers bizarre gardening accident; Cyclists burn 40 Cream Eggs a day at the Tour de France + more in today’s Live Blog”
Top tip – do not try cycling
Top tip – do not try cycling behind someone that’s just eaten 759 Brussels sprouts.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Would inhaling the gas be classified as doping or can riders get a TUE for it?
“…….behind someone that’s
“…….behind someone that’s just eaten 759 Brussels sprouts.”
Hopefully there’d be a passing James Burke to capture the moment with some impeccable timing.
HowardR wrote:
.
Well, that Bob didn’t do his
Well, that Bob didn’t do his research properly, did he?
brooksby wrote:
I feel rather sorry for old Bob. In a time that will live in our collective memory as an Age of Considerable Stupidity he has just outed himself as The Stupidest Man in Britain.
if, that is, he is indeed a man.
“Joshua Harris director of
“Joshua Harris director of Road safety charity Brake told the London Evening Standard (link is external) that the results indicate more funding is needed.
“These findings reveal that most adults just don’t think it’s safe to cycle on our roads and more is clearly needed to be done to convince them otherwise.”
Oh the irony! Brake, the very organisation which has spent thirty years lying about the risks of cycling to convince everyone that it is incredibly dangerous so that they could promote helmets. At least they didn’t mention them this time, but then, they do have thirty years of disinformation to make up for. Perhaps if they apologised and issued a statement saying that they were wrong I might have the tiniest shred of respect for them.
http://www.brake.org.uk/news/711-310811