A row has broken out between Oxford's two local authorities, the city and county councils, over delays to plans to spend almost a million pounds allocated to cycling facilities in the city.
The Oxford Times reports that Oxford City Council had assigned £840,000 for cycling projects,to be spent by 2016. But the Oxford Mail revealed in July that only £15.000 had been spent.
City councillor John Tanner (Labour), the executive board member for cleaner, greener Oxford says that Oxfordshire County Council, the transport authority, is preventing cycling schemes from going ahead. The county council denies the accusation.
Cllr Tanner, who has asked local people to submit ideas for ways the money should be spent, said: "People are still writing in with their ideas and there is no lack of schemes being proposed but the county council is standing in the way and they are putting an embargo on any cycle schemes which is unfortunate.
“It is because the county council is consulting on a new transport strategy and they have said that until it is agreed they don’t want to waste money.
“But there are some schemes we can spend the money on and it is my hope that we will be able to do so.”
While the county council blocks other schemes, Tanner said, the city council will work on projects where it owns the land and does not need the county council's approval, such as in the city's parks.
The county council is working on a new infrastructure plan that is expected to be finished by March 2015.
Simon Hunt, chairman of cycling group Cyclox, said: “It is obviously not helpful for cycling if money that could be spent is being delayed because of a policy of waiting to see what the big picture is. This is really very silly and disadvantaging people who want to cycle.”
County council spokesman Dominic Llewellyn-Jones said: “The county council have placed no embargo on the city bringing forward any cycling infrastructure improvements.
“If the city want to come forward with cycling schemes we will gladly consider them but it is of course important to see how they would fit within our plans for the wider city.”
4 thoughts on “City v county in Oxford row over cycling facilities”
See the same kind of issues
See the same kind of issues here in Cambridge. Oxford and Cambridge both need unitary authorities.
cat1commuter wrote:See the
yes no maybe,
IF Oxford wants to spend money fine, but what about the route between Burford and Witney? or Abingdon and Faringdon? etc.
There does actually need to be some thought about this and the bigger picture, in the same way London isn’t the UK Oxford, isn’t Oxfordshire, the downside of the UK system is that the needs of the periphery get forgotten whilst spending shed loads that benefit the centre.
Do we really need to spend more money in a piecemeal way? Would It not make more sense to sitback for a moment and formulate a long term plan that will actually make the roads safe for all?
mrmo wrote:Would It not make
Long term plan? All new vehicles to be fitted with collision avoidance and mitigation devices, all existing vehicles over 1500kg to be retrofitted with the same plus GPS tracking and video recording on all commercial vehicles.
You want safe roads? Lobby for safer vehicles.
I get somewhat annoyed at
I get somewhat annoyed at local government arguing among themselves, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of certain plans, and yet nothing happens.
The problems with these debates are that when the end of the financial year period arrives, if the money is not spent its lost, and is not rolled over to the following financial year period. That’s why you often see local governments spending money stupidly in February and March so it’s not hoovered up in main budgetary pot.
Someone needs to step up at either County or City level and do something, e.g. More cycle routes, more cycling events, more cycling awareness, more cycling safety awareness. Just do something or the money will be lost, and cycling suffers as a result.