Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
mdavidford
June 2, 2025 at 10:22 am in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1154081
mdavidford
Bristol Post should have
Bristol Post should have wrote:Frustration isbrewing amongbeing brewed by Bristol Livereadersover the divisive East Bristol ‘Liveable Neighbourhood’ initiative
mdavidford
Reports of a second vehicle,
Reports of a second vehicle, believed to be a hummer, involved in the incident unconfirmed.
Accident investigators are combing the area.
Etc.
mdavidford
Seems unlikely, since they’re
Seems unlikely, since they’re from the area where the offence was committed.
Maybe Inverness has more free court capacity than Glasgow?
mdavidford
Would you have to ride round
Would you have to ride round at 52mph, mowing down bystanders?
mdavidford
To be fair, Reform do have
To be fair, Reform do have some experience with incredibly woolly ‘contracts’.
mdavidford
I thought Badenoch’s position
I thought Badenoch’s position was it was both entirely meaningless AND a massive sell-out of Britain’s interests.
May 20, 2025 at 9:29 am in reply to: Car crashes into building – please post your Local news stories #1153675
mdavidford
It died doing what it loved
It died doing what it loved best.
May 14, 2025 at 2:14 pm in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1153519
mdavidford
What do we want? A reasonable
What do we want? A reasonable, informed, and nuanced discussion in a spirit of co-operation. When do we want it? When’s good for you?
mdavidford
Hasn’t paid it’s road quacks
Hasn’t paid it’s road quacks either.
mdavidford
brooksby wrote:
brooksby wrote:did they have a graduation ceremony or something?Classless of 2025?
mdavidford
Sure – I’ve been through both
Sure – I’ve been through both those junctions many times, and neither is pleasant. It’s just the automatic assumption that ‘more road’ must be the answer, instead of, say, lower speeds, or other types of re-engineering.
The Beedon one is actually pretty long already – it’s just that it’s below the level of the A34, with a bunch of shrubbery in the way, which rather hinders the view of approaching traffic.
mdavidford
mdavidford
Although swearing in public
Although swearing in public isn’t an offence per se. It’s only if it satisfies certain other criteria that it becomes an offence. So it’s not just dubious whether the public interest criteria is satisfied – it’s dubious whether an offence has been committed at all.
mdavidford
The fact that they’ve trawled
The fact that they’ve trawled through all your submissions in that way (instead of focussing on the actual event in question) seems to be more evidence of this being a vexatious prosecution that’s more aimed at making you shut up and go away than it does of anything else.
-
AuthorReplies