Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 20, 2025 at 9:29 am in reply to: Car crashes into building – please post your Local news stories #1153675
mdavidford
It died doing what it loved
It died doing what it loved best.
May 14, 2025 at 2:14 pm in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1153519
mdavidford
What do we want? A reasonable
What do we want? A reasonable, informed, and nuanced discussion in a spirit of co-operation. When do we want it? When’s good for you?
mdavidford
Hasn’t paid it’s road quacks
Hasn’t paid it’s road quacks either.
mdavidford
brooksby wrote:
brooksby wrote:did they have a graduation ceremony or something?Classless of 2025?
mdavidford
Sure – I’ve been through both
Sure – I’ve been through both those junctions many times, and neither is pleasant. It’s just the automatic assumption that ‘more road’ must be the answer, instead of, say, lower speeds, or other types of re-engineering.
The Beedon one is actually pretty long already – it’s just that it’s below the level of the A34, with a bunch of shrubbery in the way, which rather hinders the view of approaching traffic.
mdavidford
mdavidford
Although swearing in public
Although swearing in public isn’t an offence per se. It’s only if it satisfies certain other criteria that it becomes an offence. So it’s not just dubious whether the public interest criteria is satisfied – it’s dubious whether an offence has been committed at all.
mdavidford
The fact that they’ve trawled
The fact that they’ve trawled through all your submissions in that way (instead of focussing on the actual event in question) seems to be more evidence of this being a vexatious prosecution that’s more aimed at making you shut up and go away than it does of anything else.
mdavidford
bbc wrote:
bbc wrote:LTNs were first installed on six roads in east Oxford and Cowley in May 2022…so three years so far. They’ve just asked for four years worth of spending to make the number look bigger.
mdavidford
It also conflates spending on
It also conflates spending on ‘LTNs and quickways cycle routes’ with spending just on LTNs, and fails to mention that £3.8m is a piddling amount in the context of four years worth of budget that runs into £bns.
May 10, 2025 at 12:14 pm in reply to: Brexit Britain unable to afford basic public services #1153341
mdavidford
chrisonabike wrote:
chrisonabike wrote:I personally favour smaller states as part of a larger union – but presumably those who didn’t felt that we were already in more of a “United States” arrangement or were heading that way because of “ever closer union”?Quite a few people bizarrely advanced the argument that ‘you can’t imagine the US sacrificing sovereignty in this kind of way!’. To which the answer is, er, the clue is in the name…
mdavidford
I doubt that the ‘obvious
I doubt that the ‘obvious danger’ they’re thinking of is falling off.
This is the ‘road’ in question – clearly it’s ridiculous to expect a busy thoroughfare like this to be safe for kids to ride their bikes on.

mdavidford
chrisonabike wrote:Hirsute wrote:I think you’ll find it is spending on biscuits.We should cut all spending on “healthy” vegan low-fat low sugar buscuits! There’s no such thing as an obesity crisis – it’s fake news, designed to allow the rich tea set to make more gold bars and take taxis to hobnob at conferences. We need a time out – we should be taking control of our Borders! We’ve reached peek Frean!
Nice!
May 9, 2025 at 10:21 am in reply to: Bristol: ‘Invisible’ cycle lane to finally be made more visible #1153289
mdavidford
Bungle_52 wrote:Surely someone should decide what colour a cycle lane should be and stick to it.The Dutch are way ahead of you.

mdavidford
D. We’ve just elected a bunch
D. We’ve just elected a bunch of fruit( short)cakes to the council – why do they need more?
-
AuthorReplies