Drivers and their problems

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #32276
    David9694

    A new catch-all Tea Shop thread for those miscellaneous new stories that don’t quite fit with parking, crashing into buildings or trapped/prisoners in their homes. 

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 5,722 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1154987
    0
    David9694
    newbankgyratory wrote:
    The instance where you attempted to squeeze past three oncoming vehicles – sheer bloody-mindedness on your part – you put yourself in danger and broke someones side-mirror. Disgraceful.

    cyclists should be more considerate toward drivers and all the trauma they put them through – having to worry about police visits, insurance forms, court dates, penalty points, crappy courtesy cars – all while the cyclist lounges in a hospital bed and doesn’t even pay road tax! 

    #1154985
    0
    mdavidford

    Locals ‘incandescent’ about
    Locals ‘incandescent’ about buses using side streets
    https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/25283842.oxford-residents-upset-return-buses-side-streets/

    … as a diversion due to a burst water main.
    The worst part? They might have to park a bit further away.
    Try to stop people using the side streets as a cut through in their cars, though, and people will be up in arms about that.

    #1154983
    0
    pockstone

    So, ‘Give way to oncoming

    So, ‘Give way to oncoming vehicles’ actually means ‘Don’t give way to oncoming vehicles. Expect them to stop and plough on through regardless.’

    If the rules on the newbankgyratory dictate that whosoever gets to the line first just sails over a giveway line, then I’ll avoid it.

    That’s not how the rules of the road actually work.

    #1154981
    0
    bensynnock

    An entirely cost free
    An entirely cost free solution to lowering speed limits across the country is based on the fact that the signs do not specify what units they use. Simply change them all to km/h and you’ve made the roads safer and reduced pollution at zero cost.

    #1154979
    0
    newbankgyratory

    Come off it. In all three

    Come off it. In all three cases the oncoming vehicles were closer to the constriction than you were on your bicycle. Yes, the signage says people from your direction have priority, you should have anticipated that they were going to get there first,  and then stopped to let them get past – you’d probably get at least one cheery thank-you wave.

    The instance where you attempted to squeeze past three oncoming vehicles – sheer bloody-mindedness on your part – you put yourself in danger and broke someones side-mirror. Disgraceful.

     

     

     

    #1154975
    0
    Bungle_52
    brooksby wrote:
    Common road signs that drivers are still confused by – do you know what they mean? How many can you correctly identify? (Sun)

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/35644066/common-road-signs-quiz-test/

    What’s very worrying is that one of the “ten most commonly misunderstood” signs is this one:

     

     

    Well that would explain these then.

    https://road.cc/content/news/near-miss-day-520-cyclist-hit-coming-under-bridge-280003
    https://upride.cc/incident/fails-to-cede-priority-at-bridge/
    https://upride.cc/incident/driver-fails-to-obey-give-way-sign-forcing-cyclist-into-narrow-gap/

    I assumed it was just because I was a cyclist.

    PS these aren’t the only times it has happened but the two upride videos are the only ones the police have taken action on.

    #1154973
    0
    David9694

    Some of these folk are just

    Some of these folk are just one post away from “can’t you having running water wait? Drivers are being inconvenienced here, you know.”

    Angry residents call Colchester roadworks ‘absolute joke’

    https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/25280513.angry-residents-call-colchester-roadworks-absolute-joke/

    #1154971
    0
    brooksby

    No, afraid not – that “.” was

    No, afraid not – that “.” was me deleting a comment I’d made after the subject turned up on the “main” Live Blog.

    #1154967
    0
    David9694

    Are you getting the same

    Are you getting the same double posting effect I keep getting?  There is a comment delete function, but it seems to cause the whole thread to go off line for a few seconds and you have to go in via a new window. 

    #1154943
    0
    David9694

    Taxi drivers warned of

    Taxi drivers warned of cyclist scam demanding money over false phone use claims after video emerges

    Speaking to The Standard, Mr McNamara said the tactic used by the cyclist is becoming more common and warned those visiting the capital of “another scam”, alongside the likes of phone snatching and overpriced pedicabs.

    https://www.taxi-point.co.uk/post/taxi-drivers-warned-of-cyclist-scam-demanding-money-over-false-phone-use-claims-after-video-emerges

    how has the cyclist’s footage ended up on the internet?  

    edit – Rendel says 

    “Checked out the @hanadhendrix account on Twitter from which this video emanates, it’s basically a total spoof from a wannabe comedian who advertises his videos as “Watch me pretend to be CyclingMikey!”  Not surprised that the viciously anti-cyclist LTDA tried to portray it as something that cyclists were actually doing; a bit disappointed that road.ccdidn’t do a brief investigation which would’ve proved that it’s bollocks.”

    (See also https://www.tiktok.com/@hanadhendrix – the story is still there on the Evening Standard site)

    #1154953
    0
    David9694

    The episode seems mighty

    The episode seems mighty fishy to me; even the Daily Mail’s write-up is hedging it. 

    Pedicabs aren’t taking journeys away from cabbies to any noticeable degree, are they? 

    Still, RCC have featured the story now, so we can all weigh in over there. 

    #1154949
    0
    brooksby

    David9694 wrote:

    .

    #1154937
    0
    brooksby

    Common road signs that

    Common road signs that drivers are still confused by – do you know what they mean? How many can you correctly identify? (Sun)

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/35644066/common-road-signs-quiz-test/

    What’s very worrying is that one of the “ten most commonly misunderstood” signs is this one:

     

     

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/Untitled_166.png

    #1154931
    0
    David9694

    one for the “stuff I’ve had

    one for the “stuff I’ve had chucked at me by car occupants” column, wherever it’s gone

    Mother tells of child’s trauma after rock hurled from bridge

    Suddenly, an almighty crash was heard and the windscreen was smashed (“smashed” doing a bit of heavy lifting here).

    “I have even written to Gosport MP, Caroline Dinenage, requesting that the bridge is removed in place of a crossing.” 

    https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/25281763.mother-tells-childs-trauma-rock-hurled-bridge/

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/IMG_6444_0.jpeg

    #1154933
    0
    mdavidford

    Jogle wrote:

    Jogle wrote:
    [b]Police car wedged on hedge after leaving road[/b]

    So much focus on the car, but how is the road doing after the breakup? 

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 5,722 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.