Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lupine Piko Max TL Front Light



Basic optics and modest runtime mean that despite the fancy electronics, this is a surprisingly crude light. Disappointing

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

Lupine make some of the most serious (and expensive) bike lights going and this Piko is the baby of the bunch. It comes in three flavours, Max (which we have here) Mini and Ultra.

The Piko Max is a small torch style unit aimed squarely at the booming all-in-one market that the likes of Exposure have helped to create. It's a pleasing little slab of metal and fits onto the bike with a simple o-ring. I found it a bit of a struggle to squeeze onto oversized bars and users with a weak grip or small hands might have a hard time.

One thing you can't say about Lupine is that they under-engineer their lights. The Piko comes with a programmable switch which offers seven different combinations of light sequence and six different operating modes. All of these are accessed by holding down the switch and counting a set number of flashes. It's a jolly clever piece of electronic wizardry but why would you want to? Lupine proudly boast that there are 56 possible combinations, which just seems like total overkill. I don't think I've ever felt the urge to re-map my light sequence and while it might appeal to hardcore gadgetheads, I can't see the point. If Lupine had set it up with a single unalterable sequence (switch lit, double click for on, three setting cycle plus flash) I don't think anyone would complain or feel shortchanged.

Ok, so once you've finished playing with the settings (including a 'disorientation flash' which even the manual says you shouldn't use) what is the light actually like to use? Well, there's good news and bad news. The good news is that the side by side Cree XM-L LEDs punch out 750 lumens, which is a decent whack of light and if you're the one behind it you'll have no trouble navigating pretty much anything short of ultra fast off-road descents. A quick look at our light graph confirms that the spread is wide, with gentle tailing off at the sides. It's certainly a reassuring light to ride by, even on dark and twisty lanes. The bad news is that the beam is very dispersed with little by way of a central spot and lots of light blasting upwards into the eyes of oncoming traffic.

Traffic includes fellow cyclists and on my commute home it was noticeable that people on the bike path were having to shield their eyes from the glare, even with the light on a low setting and the beam pointed right down. Lupine's speciality is off-road lights and really this fits into that category. Interestingly, Lupine don't even list this light in the bike light section of their website, it's actually in the flashlight bit which in itself is odd, because the unit runs hot enough to fry eggs.

The other big downer is that the run time on full power is a mere two hours. You can have up to three hours if you power down to the 470 lumen setting, but that's a serious drop in output. For comparison, the road specific Exposure Strada we tested puts out a comparable amount of light (in fact, according to the graph it punches harder and wider than the Piko) but will give you 3 hours on full power. If you're using a light for commuting and evening training rides longer runtimes mean bigger intervals between recharges and greater reassurance that you won't find yourself stranded in the bum end of nowhere. You do get some warning when the light is about to shut down, but you might want to keep the manual handy so that you can decode the various warning flashes. Compared to the superb level of information provided by the Trelock LS 950 (review coming soon) it's pretty basic and not very helpful.

Although the Piko is well made there's no getting away from the fact that the run time is poor in comparison to some of the competition and it costs £100 more than the Strada - that's pushing it even for 56 different beam settings. It also has a beam pattern that is better suited for off-road use. Whether it suits your type of riding is your decision but as we are a road site it loses points for this. You can't help wondering if the Lupine lighting geeks might have been better occupied in maximising runtime and improving the optics rather than faffing about with fancy button configurations.


Basic optics and modest runtime mean that despite the fancy electronics, this is a surprisingly crude light. Disappointing. test report

Make and model: Lupine Piko Rechargeable Front Light

Size tested: Black

Tell us what the light is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Lupine say: "our Piko TL is either an extremely compact flashlight or the most modern LED bike light in the world."

It's certainly one of the most complicated lights I've come across.

It's certainly the most complicated. Gets far too hot to be a torch, unless you also need a handwarmer.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the light?

Twin Cree XM-L leds

Charger One smart charger

Programmable switch

Aluminium casing

Charger One

Rate the light for quality of construction:

Casing feels really solid

Rate the light for design and ease of use. How simple was the light to use?

Hmmm. The switch is easy to operate but there are 56 different ways to configure the settings, which is surely 55 more than anyone actually needs.

Rate the light for the design and usability of the clamping system/s

It's a basic O-ring, which gives a good snug hold, but might be difficult for people with smaller hands or a weak grip.

Rate the light for waterproofing. How did it stand up to the elements?

Casing looks sound and switch is rubberised but charging port is exposed and might be vulnerable. That said, it survived the hose test unscathed.

Rate the light for battery life. How long did it last? How long did it take to recharge?

2 hours on full power is poor for a light at this price. Charges in less than three hours.

Rate the light for performance:

Big wide beam, but too dispersed to be ideal for road use.

Rate the light for durability:

Two year warranty on the light.

Rate the light for weight, if applicable:
Rate the light for value:

Has two thirds the run time of an Exposure Strada, but costs over £100 more...

Tell us how the light performed overall when used for its designed purpose

On dark lanes it's a nice light although oncoming traffic might beg to differ. Short run-time does rather limit it's use.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the light

Modest size, great to see by on dark lanes.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the light

Short run-time, distinctly unfriendly to oncoming traffic, huge price tag and unnecessarily complicated.

Did you enjoy using the light? Mostly

Would you consider buying the light? No

Would you recommend the light to a friend? No

Anything further to say about the light in conclusion?

£350 buys you complicated electronics and a powerful light, but very average run time.

Overall rating: 6/10

About the tester

Age: 42  Height: 5' 8  Weight: er....85kg

I usually ride: Kona Dew Drop, Dawes Century SE, Carlton Corsa  My best bike is: Guess SC1 scandium

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, Audax and long distance solo rides


Add new comment


Rob Simmonds | 12 years ago

Thanks for the comments, it's always good to get feedback on reviews.

I actually got on ok with the mount, despite having very fat bars. I suspect I was using the smaller of the supplied o-rings (only one ring made it down to me from Road.CC Towers) which may explain why I had a bit of struggle fitting it and why it stayed in place pretty well. If you've been using the larger ring, perhaps it might be worth going small?

mehran | 12 years ago

I think the tester is being way too kind.
I am a road cyclist and I was looking for a light for my evening training. I was considering Exposure and Lupine and finally bought a Piko in Dec. mainly because I couldn't find an alternative (Exposure) in stock anywhere.
The positives are 1) looks great, 2) lightweight, 3) acceptable battery life well over 3 hours on 70% power. And that's it. To be fair to Lupine, they list this particular model under flashlight and that should have been a clue.

The mount is simply USELESS. Specially if you have an oversized bar. The back hook on the mount is way too flat to keep the rubber ring in place.
if you manage to mount it on your handle bar, no mean feat in itself, you have to keep an eye on it as it slowly rotates due to road vibration.

BE CAREFUL as the mount can and will come off. In my case, I had foreseen that and had a string around the light. What I had not considered was that the light can be dangling from the string attached to your bar and getting caught in your front wheel. I had a lucky scape.

I have since bought an Exposure Diablo and use my Piko as a nice paper weight on my desk.

Latest Comments