At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Reminds me of the strange fact that the French have no word for 'baguette'.
Robert Maxwell disproved that some time ago.
And building bikes is a bit of a chore, even when everything is set up to fit....
Buggy hit by car blamed on traffic scheme...
Mercedes A-Class WU66 LLJ below went without MOT for 8 1/2 months from 19.10.23 to 2.7.24. I just happen to be doing some following up and evidence...
I think you've got your Yateses mixed up.
Phafff!...
The veg analogy is spot on. In the same manner that I despise sprouts I have no interest in watching football, not the English premier nor the ...
"Othering" is likely involved. There are some other "but humans" features * here too I think....
The mis-reporting continues:...