At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
There is no mention in article about situations like starting from zero speed and climbing out of saddle with low cadence. With shorter cranks in...
That's simply wrong I'm afraid, if you take a base number as a reference point then an increase above it can be expressed in terms of more than 100...
1981 Raleigh brochure on EBay - a missing link in the catalogues available on line. Bidding starts at £35. ...
It's a Brexit level of over-simplification the idea that car parking charges and retail prosperity are connected.
Useful video. Gives a chance to see other's points of view. Albeit not a lot of anticipation or consideration being shown (from the cammers). Very...
It's probably in Romania by now, or Poland, but a picture would certainly help, size too?
Sounds like spam... which bike was used for the kit, please at least post pictures with the end result.
He needs a good lawyer......
I live in Gloucestershire where being inconvenienced is dealt with more harshly than being close passed, no matter how close or how fast...
I have read people commenting before about not having a camera on your helmet as it will give you injuries....