Like this site? Help us to make it better.


TRP Carbon Cyclocross Fork



Really good internally routed disc brake fork for your next cyclo-cross or gravel build

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

If you're building up a cyclo-cross or gravel bike and you're looking for a thru-axle fork for the front end, this TRP Carbon Cyclocross fork gives a very good account of itself and is definitely worthy of recommendation.

CX disc forks have been around a while now, and there's plenty of them about, but thru-axle ones are harder to come by. We recently reviewed the Enve Cross Disc fork and Dave Arthur liked the build quality and performance. The TRP Carbon Cyclocross fork shares many of the same characteristics: it's a full-carbon design, the axle-to-crown height is almost the same (397mm to the Enve's 395mm), and it's a similar weight (well, a bit lighter – 450g against 461g).

> Find your nearest dealer here

There are differences too, though. For starters, it's £80 cheaper. The TRP also uses an internal hose route where the Enve has an integrated hose clip that's clever but not quite as neat. And a big plus of the TRP fork is that it has mudguard mounts.

Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - hose routing.jpg

There are three versions of the fork: a 15mm thru-axle one, a 12mm thru-axle, and a 12mm with the mudguard mounts. I'd go for the last option, which is the one we're testing here. The mudguard mounts are simply threaded holes in the rear of the fork; to fit a mudguard you screw in an adaptor. Obviously if you don't want 'guards you can take the adaptors off, preserving the clean lines of the fork. And it has very nice lines, with a two-tone matt black/gloss black finish and an elegant shape.

Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - crown mount.jpg
Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - mudguard mount.jpg

I fitted this to my Kinesis Tripster ATR. There's a new version of that frameset now – see here – but the old version is still a great bike. The fork was the weak part of the package, though. It was early in the days of big-clearance carbon disc brake forks and it didn't even have a post-mount disc mount (it was an IS mount) and it could be a tad flexy under heavy braking.

Fitting the new fork made an immediate and noticeable difference to the front end of the bike. It's stiffer overall and that's especially noticeable in the lack of rotor rub from the front disc, which was sometimes an issue on the old fork. I'm less convinced there are obvious benefits to a thru-axle at the back of a bike, but the fork really does track better, with the bigger axle holding everything together at the bottom.

Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - disc mount.jpg

Pulling out the wheel for fettling is simple (the fork comes with a DT Swiss axle) and putting everything back together is a much more precise affair. Sometimes with a quick release you'll put the same wheel back in but the disc will be slightly misaligned because you've tightened up the QR a bit more, or a bit less. That wasn't an issue at all with the thru-axle.

Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - thru axle.jpg

Winding in the axle revealed that it felt slightly tight at one part of the revolution, suggesting that the threaded insert was a tiny bit off true. It wasn't ever an issue and it didn't affect the performance of the fork, but it's worth noting. The only other possible issue is that we're still on post-mount here, not flat-mount which is the newer standard. If you're buying a groupset to build up your bike, make sure you get post-mount callipers. You can fit post-mount to a flat-mount fork with an adaptor, but it doesn't work the other way round.

> Thinking of building up your own bike? Check out our guide

Clearance for 700C tyres is a claimed 40mm, and that seems about right given the fit of 35mm Schwalbe G-Ones within the blades. That might rule out some bigger monster-cross-style tyres but it's fine for general purpose rubber; if you're ever likely to go big then the Enve, which takes a 45mm tyre, might be the better bet.

Trp Carbon Cyclocross Fork - tyre clearance.jpg

Overall, this is a really good fork for a higher-end CX or gravel build. It's well made and it performs as you'd want: it's stiff and precise. It's not really giving away anything to the more expensive Enve fork in terms of performance, and the option for mudguard mounts means it's more versatile. Recommended.


Really good internally routed disc brake fork for your next cyclo-cross or gravel build

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website test report

Make and model: TRP Carbon Cyclocross Fork

Size tested: n/a

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

TRP distributor Upgrade says: "With an ever expanding offering of disc equipped road and CX bikes on the market it makes perfect sense for one of the Worlds leading brake manufacturers to design a fork specifically around the disc brake. Using their 20+ years of experience of brake manufacture, TRP have put together the ultimate carbon Cyclocross fork."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

* Weight: 450g

* Internal cable routing

* 1.5' tapered carbon steerer

* 40mm tyre clearance

* 397mm axle to crown

* Rake 50mm

* Options for 12mm or 15mm DT Swiss Thru Axle

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)
Rate the product for value:

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Very well, an effective upgrade or a good starting point for a new build.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Axle options, mudguard mounts.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Axle thread slightly off true, flat-mount version not available (yet).

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? I did, in fact  1

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your score

It's versatile and a good performer, and gives a very good overall performance.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 43  Height: 189cm  Weight: 92kg

I usually ride: whatever I'm testing...  My best bike is: Kinesis Tripster ATR, Kinesis Aithein

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, time trialling, cyclo-cross, commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, mountain biking, Mountain Bike Bog Snorkelling, track

Dave is a founding father of, having previously worked on Cycling Plus and What Mountain Bike magazines back in the day. He also writes about e-bikes for our sister publication ebiketips. He's won three mountain bike bog snorkelling World Championships, and races at the back of the third cats.

Latest Comments