At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
In principle and in the abstract, this is difficult to object to. An educational course to improve road safety is a good thing. The problems are...
Four hundred quid a year for just cycling which is the only sport I watch online is too much I'm afraid. I've cancelled my Discovery+ subscription.
In Scotland, saying "medical episode" or even just "I can't remember" is normally the end of the matter...
Good for them and cycling in general.
That reminds to me to try and find that recent ITV documentary that was on the other evening on that very subject. I presume it'll be on ITVX?
I thought the saying was, "If it bleeds, we can kill it"?
It's a topsey-turvey world some times:...
wtjs who, if I've understood correctly, only reports "must"s now...
correct. poor typing!
I quite liked the changes. I liked parking parallel to the road as I have a camper van so could sit with the side door open to the sea. ...